Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Just read the bloody uniform policy!!!

765 replies

flingoringo · 06/09/2023 15:10

I've just read an article about a school in Gateshead where lots of kids were sent home or out in isolation on day one of term because they were wearing the wrong shoes. The offending shoes seem to be mainly a Vivienne Westwood ballet flat (with a big silver VW emblem on the front) and a Nike walking boots. Lots of kids wearing the same, from yr7 to yr11.
Parents are up in arms, obviously. One mentions the CoL crisis so the need to scrimp and save to spend A HUNDRED QUID on the Nike shoes. One mum said her yr7 daughter won't be going back she's finding her a new school.

The school (taken over by an academy in 2019) says the policy is clear, plain black shoes with no logos. That they have done their best to help yr6 parents understand what was to be expected once on yr7.

Now I don't necessarily agree with schools being overly strict with uniform policy. But I do accept that I have to agree to follow the rules at the schools that I chose to send my kids to and if we chose not to then of course they'll be consequences.

AIBU to think it's it's completely ridiculous that this happens every bloody year?!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Tabbytabs · 06/09/2023 18:17

Personally I think all uniform is shit and a way of controlling kids and stamping on their creativity and sense of self. It is not an equaliser because they still have coats, shoes, bags etc that can be cheap or branded. The working world is different to it used to be and not many people wear business dress any more. Children in Europe and the US don’t seem to explode because they don’t wear uniforms.

I would have liked a choice to send mine to a non uniform school, but these don’t seem to exist. Luckily ds is about to start college, so no more uniform! Hurrah! I was so pleased I never had to wash any of those crap shirts or naff polyester sweatshirts ever again!

Janiie · 06/09/2023 18:16

Callyem · 06/09/2023 18:09

While I disagree with the strict uniform policies in the first place, I absolutely defend the school's right to enforce it. The policy will have been put on the website, emailed out, given to the incoming year 7 as transition etc.

It shouldn't be their policy or be on their website. It shouldn't be any of the teacher's business whether girls wear ballet flats or not. Ditto skinny trousers v sensible trousers. Just teach the kids!

mbosnz · 06/09/2023 18:16

I am usually very supportive of uniform policy, but I am fucking livid at the new rules at our school. Sixth form, so mufti - no bare shoulders. Too distracting. Today a girl was told to go home and change as her bra strap was visible THROUGH THE FABRIC of the back of her shirt.

Meanwhile, these poor distractable boys are taking their bloody shirts off, with their nip's out, to play football.

What the actual fuck?

Carpediemmakeitcount · 06/09/2023 18:16

HejLittleAppleBlossom · 06/09/2023 18:14

Why do you defend their right to enforce a policy you don’t agree with? These policies demonise children for things broadly beyond their control, and often lead to extraordinary punitive measures that should have no place in modern society. We have to challenge these policies, not defend them!

What about workers in supermarkets who have to wear a uniform. Do you disagree with there uniform policy.

Precipice · 06/09/2023 18:15

Livinginanotherworld · 06/09/2023 17:37

Whatever happened to good old Clark’s and Start Rite school shoes. £100 Vivienne Westwood ffs ! Ridiculous. If everyone stuck to the uniform list properly there would be no bullying and showing off with clothes and shoes, they’d all be wearing the same. It’s not really difficult is it ? God help all these little darlings in the real world of work ?

Nonsense.

They'd be (and is) bullying over other matters. There's showing off with school accessories and other belongings and showing off about where you go outside of school. Children can still tell that some of them are a lot richer than others and they can find themselves other children who they think make good targets on one basis or another. If they're wearing the same usually poor quality uniform clothing, that doesn't do away with everything else.

Most of us in the real world of work don't have a set uniform. The school uniform is not a young person's version of the adult's experience in dressing for work.

HejLittleAppleBlossom · 06/09/2023 18:14

Why do you defend their right to enforce a policy you don’t agree with? These policies demonise children for things broadly beyond their control, and often lead to extraordinary punitive measures that should have no place in modern society. We have to challenge these policies, not defend them!

Janiie · 06/09/2023 18:13

Teachers should concentrate on teaching and let parents worry about clothing their kids.

As long as kids are clean, smart and wearing the correct items and colour scheme that should be all teachers need to fret about. Honestly I'd be embarrassed if I was a teacher telling kids they can't wear shoes with a logo Confused

Callyem · 06/09/2023 18:09

While I disagree with the strict uniform policies in the first place, I absolutely defend the school's right to enforce it. The policy will have been put on the website, emailed out, given to the incoming year 7 as transition etc.

ZadocPDederick · 06/09/2023 18:07

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 06/09/2023 16:22

Way to miss the point. The active girls who do want to play cannot if they are in ballet flats and this trains them out of the exercise habits they would have gotten into had they had proper shoes.

My footballing interest was curtailed by a broken toe incurred kicking a ball in soft shoes. I never got back into it.

No one imposes this forced idlesness on boys. I smell misogyny.

Yet again, you are missing the point, possibly deliberately. If you don't have uniform rules, the active girls who want to play games won't turn up in ballet flats. If they're wearing ballet flats due to peer pressure or something similar, it will be that same peer pressure that deters them from playing games, not their shoes.

Allowing a choice of shoes doesn't impose anything on girls. Making boys wear sensible shoes does not encourage them out of idleness if they want to be idle.

There's also quite major prejudice in describing a disinclination to play playground games as idleness. If any child wants to spend their playtime reading, they are no more or less idle than the child who wants to kick balls around.

Cheswick · 06/09/2023 18:06

Have you tried Ricosta shoes? The are orthopaedic, waterproof and seems to last whole school year and beyond / can be passed down.

SoupDragon · 06/09/2023 18:05

ZadocPDederick · 06/09/2023 18:01

If a child feels he can't live without branded shoes, the chances are that the unfortunate parent ends up forking out for those plus a separate pair for school. It doesn't do them any favours.

More fool them!

if a child "can't live without branded shoes" someone has messed up their parenting.

flingoringo · 06/09/2023 18:02

jlpth · 06/09/2023 17:42

I just can't get past the "cost of living" vs 100 pound nike or vivienne westwood shoes. Crazy. Amazon have plenty of school shoes under 20 quid, some under 10 quid. What is the matter with people?

It's so ridiculous. I don't disagree with lots of posters on hear who don't agree with schools being really prescriptive about uniform. I think England is quite bonkers when it comes to uniform. But the parent's interviewed for the article are , quite frankly, idiots. A mum is taking her child out of school because the school isn't letting her daughter wear Vivienne Westwood ballet flats FFS! And I didn't know Nike made walking boots until today.
Crazy.

OP posts:
Carpediemmakeitcount · 06/09/2023 18:02

Annaishere · 06/09/2023 17:55

That’s another thing. When they’re walking miles to school they need trainers

Nothing stopping them getting changed into school shoes when they get there. They can leave their trainers in a locker. Thata what we done back in the day.

ZadocPDederick · 06/09/2023 18:01

Esmereldapawpatrol · 06/09/2023 16:22

Surely the no branded footwear is there to help parents. You then don't need to spend hundreds on branded shoes!

I don't understand parents getting the hump over buying uniform. You would be spending much more if your kids were going in their own clothes and it puts everyone level. No one is standing out for the wrong reasons.

If a child feels he can't live without branded shoes, the chances are that the unfortunate parent ends up forking out for those plus a separate pair for school. It doesn't do them any favours.

imnotthatkindofmum · 06/09/2023 17:59

Annaishere · 06/09/2023 15:19

With the Nike shoes anyway it could be the parents don’t want to have to buy two separate pairs of lesser quality shoes for school and home

Then I would spend the money on the school shoes and buy cheaper trainers.

Also expensive trainers doesn't necessarily mean good quality.

MariaVT65 · 06/09/2023 17:59

ZadocPDederick · 06/09/2023 17:57

If a school can only teach about sticking to the rules by making a fuss about shoes, it is seriously failing as a school. The simple answer is not to have uniform rules beyond a requirement that children don't take the piss.

Agreed. I don’t agree with the principle of ‘learning and sticking to rules’ if the rules themselves are stupid.

ZadocPDederick · 06/09/2023 17:57

Rosscameasdoody · 06/09/2023 16:04

Wearing Nike boots when the regulations clearly state no logos affects teaching and learning quite a lot. The teaching is to stick to the rules, and by not doing so, you are clearly not learning.

If a school can only teach about sticking to the rules by making a fuss about shoes, it is seriously failing as a school. The simple answer is not to have uniform rules beyond a requirement that children don't take the piss.

CecilyP · 06/09/2023 17:57

jlpth · 06/09/2023 17:42

I just can't get past the "cost of living" vs 100 pound nike or vivienne westwood shoes. Crazy. Amazon have plenty of school shoes under 20 quid, some under 10 quid. What is the matter with people?

You’ll probably find the Nike shoes will last far longer than a cheap £10-20 supermarket shoe. And can be worn out of school as well.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 06/09/2023 17:57

Sueveneers · 06/09/2023 17:49

No it is not a double standard at all because piercings are for ears (barring religious/cultural reasons). That's it. Period. End of story.

Edited

You only think that piercings are only for ears because that's what you've been culturally conditioned to believe. You even acknowledge that other cultures disagree with you! Within the UK, people also disagree with you, why is this hard to comprehend?

Unlike gravitational attraction and the speed of light, appropriate piercing locations aren't one of the immutable laws of the universe. They are a matter of culturally-influenced opinion.

YANBU for having an opinion about where you are happy to pierce your body. YABU for wanting to impose that opinion on others and YABVVU in threatening your children with abusive criminal violence for wanting to pierce their bodies as they like.

MariaVT65 · 06/09/2023 17:56

Soontobe60 · 06/09/2023 17:51

I wear orthotics, as do many many people. I have absolutely no problem getting a wide variety of shoes for all occasions that fit my insoles.

Why are you talking to me like i’m making stuff up? The consultant literally told me i would need to take the existing insole out, and i’ve tried. I cannot get my son’s feet into shoes with both insoles in. His insoles are a good 1.5cm thick.

allhellcantstopusnow · 06/09/2023 17:55

Children need to know that there are rules to follow if life. You can't just turn up to work and do as you please - you get fired.

And this. I work for local government and can wear pretty much anything.

Annaishere · 06/09/2023 17:55

That’s another thing. When they’re walking miles to school they need trainers

Orturo · 06/09/2023 17:54

LOL at people pontificating about how brogues encourage children to be active.

Do you all go jogging in brogues?

ZadocPDederick · 06/09/2023 17:54

Orturo · 06/09/2023 15:59

Every year the papers run these stories.

Why don't they run stories about how schools across the country blithely ignore government advice around uniform costs? Or stories about how ridiculous it is to make children wear dress shoes to school? Schools and education officials are always banging on about how children need to be more active, should walk to school yadda yadda. And then make wearing dress shoes compulsory.

THIS! The number of schools that insist on wanky ludicrously expensive uniform with hideous logos on is ridiculous, and they're virtually all academies who find it easier to enforce rigid uniform rules than to put in place effective teaching and learning.

They always bang on about the importance of children learning to keep to the rules, yet never seem to work out that ignoring the DfE guidance themselves isn't exactly setting the best example.

allhellcantstopusnow · 06/09/2023 17:51

Echobelly · 06/09/2023 15:36

The logo thing is also about preventing competition and comparison between kids as to who are the haves and the have nots.

If ever I need PR, I'm going to find the people who put this out. It's such bollocks and doesn't go towards protecting kids from being singled out in any way at all.