Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

...to think teachers DO get paid over the holidays?

460 replies

MasterBeth · 29/08/2023 14:35

It doesn't make sense to me.

Some people say teachers don't get paid over the holidays. They are paid, they say, for 40 weeks, but their money is aggregated over 52 weeks and paid monthly.

What does that even mean? How is it (practically) any different to being paid (less per week) for 52 weeks?

OP posts:
MasterBeth · 30/08/2023 09:23

noblegiraffe · 30/08/2023 09:06

I think you just made my point for me.

I genuinely don't know what point you think you're making.

OP posts:
noblegiraffe · 30/08/2023 09:06

MasterBeth · 30/08/2023 00:46

Your persecution complex is misplaced. I think teachers should be paid more. Pointing out/exploring why you don't get paid for three months of the year doesn't seem to be asking you to justify yourself.

I think you just made my point for me.

Newnamefor23 · 30/08/2023 08:59

kitsuneghost · 29/08/2023 15:02

Following as I find it confusing too
So a normal teacher's salary is 30K

Do they actually only get paid 26.5K (this would be 6 weeks unpaid)
Do the get 30K it says on the tin
Do they get 34K pro rata (so 30K because 6 weeks is unpaid)

Not interested on how hard you work or do longer hours than everyone else
or how underpaid y'all are
Just straight up confused about the 6 weeks being unpaid

Different people consider it in different ways.

When I was teaching I considered my wages as a monthly thing. Ie salary/12 = monthly pay.

I never bothered to calculate whether some of the year was paid more, some unpaid etc.

Whilst one can leave when you like notice periods normally run to 31st Dec, 30th April(?) and 31st August.

I finished teaching in the July but my actual contract finished 31st August and so I got ‘paid’ for the remainder of July and August. ie 12 months of pay for my 12 months of work.

To complicate things further…. Most on a salary have no mention of hours worked. Teachers do - a notional number of hours/year. All but impossible to do the job properly and keep to the hours.

Not unrelated…… many TAs and Technicians are paid just for termtime only.

The pay is poor anyway. Their monthly pay is often calculated…..

(FT salary x40/52)/12 = monthly pay.

Our technician turned down overtime as it would put him above the benefits level - and he was a single man.

No wonder so many quit and work for supermarkets etc.

Zonder · 30/08/2023 08:29

PeggyPiglet · 29/08/2023 23:56

The contract basically says teachers get paid e.g 30k if they do all the hours that are actually needed to do the job effectively.

The problem is there's no real benchmark for this as the job never feels 'done'. Some teachers will work themselves to death to feel like they've achieved this, and certain schools will expect this too.

It's a very lazily thought out clause, and is one of the reasons so many teachers burn out because it's not quantifiable. 'any other hours needed to do the job effectively' can have no limit in the eyes of SLT in schools or teachers who feel like they can't feasibly achieve this without killing themselves.

This. My contract says 6.5 directed hours a day plus a non specified but reasonable amount of non directed hours to cover the workload.

I'm a peripatetic advisory SEN teacher. My directed hours are 9-3.30 usually. This is time I spend either in schools or driving between them, or in meetings/training. I start work and hour earlier to do emails and make sure I'm prepped for the day. I work 3.30 onwards at home to do the paperwork. Sometimes I can finish about 5.30 and have dinner with my family. Most days (at least 2 of the 3 days a week that I work) I then have to carry on until the work is done. Usually this takes til 9 or 10. So I am doing between 3 and 6 hours a day non directed time. I'm not paid more for this. It is part of my contract and I agree, it's a lazily thought out clause.

It's a graduate job, I'm highly skilled in my specialisation and I've been teaching for 30 years. In many jobs I would have been on a higher salary years ago. That's why it matters that we don't get paid for the whole year. If the salary was this and I was paid for a full year it would really be a joke.

Italiandreams · 30/08/2023 07:58

I think you are trying to make teachers contract and employment fit into your understanding of a job contract. It just doesn’t .

I agree it’s a salaried position so people are paid to
complete the job .If we wanted teachers to work more days though we would have to pay them more and their holidays becomes less.

When people are asking for schools to be open more days and have shorter holidays, teacher quite rightly point out they are not paid to be in school anymore days, and so I guess this is where the argument lies. I think it just is a job that doesn’t fit the standard model.

Takoneko · 30/08/2023 07:32

mumsneedwine · 30/08/2023 07:23

@Walkaround 😂 perfect analysis. No other job I know has only 3 times a year you can resign, and if you miss it by a day you are stuck for another term. Know why, but it is a bit bonkers.

Trying to explain teacher notice periods and resignation dates to non-teachers is always funny. It has to be the most bonkers part of our contracts if you are used to having a fixed notice period in a normal job.

If you resign on 28/29th February it can be as short as 4 weeks, but if you resign on 1 November it can be over 5 months.

mumsneedwine · 30/08/2023 07:23

@Walkaround 😂 perfect analysis. No other job I know has only 3 times a year you can resign, and if you miss it by a day you are stuck for another term. Know why, but it is a bit bonkers.

Walkaround · 30/08/2023 07:13

(Or, to put it another way, teachers’ employment contracts are ridiculous 😂)

Walkaround · 30/08/2023 06:51

@MasterBeth - the info you were given about maternity leave shows that teachers do not have a contractual entitlement to paid annual leave. They do have statutory rights to 28 days’ annual leave, but there is no statutory right for a teacher to be paid for all the school holidays. The practicalities of this are, clearly, that you need to consult a specialist legal adviser if you want an accurate answer to your question. It is silly to pretend there is no practical difference between one contract and another. When things go wrong with your employment, suddenly you notice the practical differences that you were airily claiming a week before were mere technicalities.

Silentmama2 · 30/08/2023 03:06

@Hercisback@Sunnydays41@Tulipvase
*Plus also, if teachers work part-time, they still have 100% of their leave, whereas with any other profession, it's pro-rata..."

In schools the holidays are set - so you get your leave at the same time as everyone else - but you are only on 'leave' for the days you work.. If I work 2 days - I'm on leave (pro-rata) for 2 days each week of the holiday - whereas full time staff are on leave for all 5 of them.

Imagine I worked in a bog standard office. I work Thursday and Friday - (2 days).. when I book leave I don't book 5 days leave (Mon - Fri) to get my Thursday and Friday off.. I get a full week holiday - but only used 2 days leave!

Theoretically a teacher could work one day a week and still have 65 days holiday a year.

You really are talking nonsense.. I work one day a week say Wednesday - as a teacher - I get paid for that one day a week - there are 52 Wednesdays in a year.. How can I possibly get 65 days holiday?

(If the government went mad and instigated full time school - and only gave teachers 4 weeks off a year ... i'd be expected to work 48 days.. again.. How can I get 65 days off?)

Pieceofpurplesky · 30/08/2023 01:47

It has been explained to you over and over OP. You're just not getting the answers you want.

It just is this way. We are paid for the days we work with the kids (plus 5 and extra hours).

195 days + standard holiday pay.
The rest of the time there are no kids there so no teaching. It's like a hotel that shuts out of season and gets rid of its seasonal workers. They are not paid as the purpose of their job is removed.

In order to maintain a steady income the pay is split over 12 months for teachers. It didn't used to be like this but someone somewhere changed it years ago.

echt · 30/08/2023 00:51

noblegiraffe · 30/08/2023 00:38

What needs to get in the bin is people making teachers jump through hoops to justify themselves by feigning interest in historical vagaries of the teaching contract.

No one gives that much of a shit.

Quite. The OP is a case in point, as their irrelevant and unwarranted psychological assessment of you demonstrates.

SnowWhiteAndTheTwoKids · 30/08/2023 00:50

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ as it looked like the work of a previously banned poster

Those 5 days are inset days (non-pupil days used for training.

echt · 30/08/2023 00:49

MasterBeth · 30/08/2023 00:47

Only if there was an increase in their directed hours, surely?

My point is about not being paid for the holidays.

sparklelikeadiamond · 30/08/2023 00:49

Teacher contracts are archaic and unlike standard job ones. There are no fixed working hours in them other than 1265 hours per year over 195 days when they can be directed to be in a particular place (ie school). It’s not 1265 hours of work - it’s a contract with a specific number of hours when the boss (head teacher) can tell them where they physically must be and what they must do. Teachers work many hours over this to fulfil their roles and this varies between schools, roles, individual teachers…

Now here is the evidence that teachers are not paid for all of the holidays.
The archaic teacher contract contains no contractual right to annual leave or holiday pay. However the 2007 working time directive gives a statutory right to 28 days annual leave.
Looking at the non-accrual of annual leave to tag on to maternity leave really lays this all out.

You can see some examples:
https://www.st-josephs.slough.sch.uk/assets/Documents/Attachments/Maternity-Leave-and-Pay-Policy-for-Teachers-.pdf

https://www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2022-02/2018%2006%2014%20-%20Maternity%20Policy%20for%20Teaching%20Staff%20%20-%20FV2.0%20-%20June%202018.doc

https://pitcheroak.worcs.sch.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/49-Maternity-Leave-for-Teachers-Jan-2015-updtd-June-2020.pdf

Plenty examples of teacher maternity policies via google.

https://www.st-josephs.slough.sch.uk/assets/Documents/Attachments/Maternity-Leave-and-Pay-Policy-for-Teachers-.pdf

SnowWhiteAndTheTwoKids · 30/08/2023 00:48

MasterBeth · 30/08/2023 00:05

It absolutely has been said to me as a point of complaint. I am trying to establish what that complaint is, why this way of payment exists and whether a more regular way of payment would be better.

@Takoneko and @PeggyPiglet are making a good stab at exploring the confusion and contradictions. It's interesting that @soupmaker has a directly contradictory view to @Takoneko - they can't both be right.

Teachers get paid 12 monthly instalments of an annual salary in the UK. Teachers are only actually paid for their contracted hours but in reality they work waaaay beyond their contracted hours so it's a moot point. It's a way to justify teachers' comparatively lower salaries. So if they were paid for the full year (and contracts were changed to include something like summer school) then teachers would need a decent whack added. There was a lot of fuss about this post COVID when lots of parents were saying teachers should just work over the summer holidays to help kids catch up but the general public had no idea about teachers' pay and conditions and that they are only contracted to work 190 days a year.

Hourly/daily rates are needed for many reasons...eg calculating part-time salaries, maternity pay, sick leave, time owed in lieu, overtime payment(rare!)
Hope that makes sense!

MasterBeth · 30/08/2023 00:47

echt · 30/08/2023 00:34

The point I made upthread still stands. If teachers were paid for the holidays, they could be compelled to be on the premises. But they're not. It's an administrative convenience. That is all.

Only if there was an increase in their directed hours, surely?

OP posts:
TheHateIsNotGood · 30/08/2023 00:47

No one makes 'teachers' do anything, except the teaching SLT, ergo it's 'teachers' that make teachers do 'extra' stuff.

This thread is about if Teachers get 'holiday pay'/paid for holidays and the consensus here is that they do.

MasterBeth · 30/08/2023 00:46

noblegiraffe · 30/08/2023 00:38

What needs to get in the bin is people making teachers jump through hoops to justify themselves by feigning interest in historical vagaries of the teaching contract.

No one gives that much of a shit.

Your persecution complex is misplaced. I think teachers should be paid more. Pointing out/exploring why you don't get paid for three months of the year doesn't seem to be asking you to justify yourself.

OP posts:
noblegiraffe · 30/08/2023 00:38

What needs to get in the bin is people making teachers jump through hoops to justify themselves by feigning interest in historical vagaries of the teaching contract.

No one gives that much of a shit.

echt · 30/08/2023 00:34

MasterBeth · 30/08/2023 00:32

This makes absolute sense to me, and yet many teachers on this thread will argue the exact opposite - that they don't get paid for the holidays.

Hence the confusion. Hence the discussion.

The point I made upthread still stands. If teachers were paid for the holidays, they could be compelled to be on the premises. But they're not. It's an administrative convenience. That is all.

marriedatlastsight · 30/08/2023 00:33

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ as it looked like the work of a previously banned poster

marriedatlastsight · 30/08/2023 00:33

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ as it looked like the work of a previously banned poster

MasterBeth · 30/08/2023 00:32

TheHateIsNotGood · 30/08/2023 00:27

Nothing needs re-structuring or changing except for the phrase "teachers don't get paid for holidays, etc".

That's all, no biggie really, it's just an archaic phrase that needs consigning to 'history' because obviously teachers get holiday pay as part of their 12 monthly payments; the T&Cs surrounding how and when they can take their holidays might be more job specific than some other jobs, but that's all factored into the pay.

Simples.

This makes absolute sense to me, and yet many teachers on this thread will argue the exact opposite - that they don't get paid for the holidays.

Hence the confusion. Hence the discussion.

OP posts:
Maddy70 · 30/08/2023 00:32

They ger paid in 12 payments. They are paid for 195 days. So that payment is spread over but they are only paid for 190 days work

Swipe left for the next trending thread