Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The WHO want your four year old to be taught about masturbation and gender identity

316 replies

GrabbyGabby · 14/05/2023 10:47

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/05/13/outrage-over-who-advice-on-sexuality-for-infants/

This is where queer theory gets you. Women have been sounding the alarm on the consequences of the promotion of queer theory in all realms of life. This is what it looks like when applies to sex ed for very young children.

So, before you dismiss people like me as modern day Mary Whitehouses, just take a read and ask yourself why? What problem is this solving? Why do very young children need to be taught about sex and sexual pleasure? Are they benefiting, if not, who is?

(article behind a paywall, but there is a trick that will allow you to read it. A quick google should tell you).

Outrage over WHO advice on sexuality for infants

Guide argues that ‘sexuality education starts from birth’

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/05/13/outrage-over-who-advice-on-sexuality-for-infants

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
OhYouBadBadKitten · 14/05/2023 14:54

QueenCamilla · 14/05/2023 13:07

The person who groomed and abused me was also a teacher.
All this current sex/ gender education is making great grounds for abuse - it would have been even easier now.

Strangely (not really) enough, Kent is just the sort of sex-positive, liberal county where the banana+condom would happen. I actually hope it didn't but the teen was convincingly shocked, blushing and weirded-out whilst telling me about it.

I'm up North now and it would be unimaginable!
We are really OK here - my son will be 10 soon and there has been nil Sex-Ed. Nothing. An hour or so talking about diverse families. No gender talks. Zero. No kids are "trans" at school. Normal life.
I'm keeping my eye out for the Sex-Ed curriculum which no doubt will start with puberty talks. Like it used to be.

But support whatever ideology suits you! Go for it! Some people only ever see flaws when they have produced an undesirable outcome.

Kent a sex-positive liberal county? Are you actually from the UK? because that sure sounds like rhetoric from ultra-religious conservatives from the States.

Neopolitan · 14/05/2023 14:54

Astralitzia · 14/05/2023 14:49

Then why are the media jumping all over old WHO reports and taking them out of context (as per this thread), but are oddly totally silent on the alleged banana incident?

Because surely, surely they'd be all over that given how keen they are to safeguard children (apparently).

Or could it be that it's complete bollocks and there's no story there at all.

Because 14 year olds being taught how to put a condom on bananas is commonplace as is talking about oral sex to 14 year olds in sex ed. It's 14 year olds, so completely believable. Not four years old, as this thread is about. If four years were taught it then yes it would make headlines. But 14 year old teenagers? Nope. It's unremarkable.

Astralitzia · 14/05/2023 14:49

Neopolitan · 14/05/2023 14:46

"If they were, it would have been all over the news and that teacher would rightly have been fired."

Chryst, you really believe that don't you?
In this age not only would the teacher not be fired, but it's not even noteworthy to even be reported or on the news.

Then why are the media jumping all over old WHO reports and taking them out of context (as per this thread), but are oddly totally silent on the alleged banana incident?

Because surely, surely they'd be all over that given how keen they are to safeguard children (apparently).

Or could it be that it's complete bollocks and there's no story there at all.

ASGIRC · 14/05/2023 14:48

TheShellBeach · 14/05/2023 13:54

Of course it isn't.
Small children masturbating is normal behaviour.

These are clearly people who have never been around children.
I mean... we all played "doctor" as kids! I didnt know about SEX, had zero idea about it, but looking back, playing doctor was very sexual.
There was loads of sexual play when I was aorund 4/5/6.
I just didnt know what it meant!

Girls dont have a penis, so its less obvious, but 4 year old boys will NOT leave their penises alone! They are obsessed! Of course they know how to masturbate, even if they dont know what it is.
My nearly 3 year old nephew had a meltdown the other day, as, after being naked for a bit at the beach, he didnt want a diaper put on, as he wanted to play with his penis...
Absolutely normal!

MargotBamborough · 14/05/2023 14:47

If the WHO want four year olds to be taught about gender identity, does that mean the WHO has worked out (a) what the fuck gender identity actually is, and (b) why we should care?

Because the last time I looked at the WHO's page on gender and gender identity it was incoherent gibberish.

Neopolitan · 14/05/2023 14:46

Astralitzia · 14/05/2023 14:40

It's not testimony, it's a post on social media.

Yes, I do say she's lying (or has been misinformed).

No school would teach a 14 year old to put on a condom with their mouth. If they were, it would have been all over the news and that teacher would rightly have been fired.

"If they were, it would have been all over the news and that teacher would rightly have been fired."

Chryst, you really believe that don't you?
In this age not only would the teacher not be fired, but it's not even noteworthy to even be reported or on the news.

Neopolitan · 14/05/2023 14:44

ZittingBiting · 14/05/2023 14:39

Because it isn't true. It's not in any sex Ed curriculum and Queen Camilla backtracked and said 'maybe it wasn't true'

It's nothing to do with 'naivety'. It's knowing what happens in schools and 14 year olds at no pont in UK schools ever have been taught to simulate oral sex on a banana as part of sex Ed.

There's a difference between naivety and not believing any old shit anonymous people say in the Internet to back up their crazy posts.

Yes, I will absolutely invalidate people lying on the Internet about important subjects like what is being taught in schools when it's not true.

I just searched right through QueenCamilla's posts, and not once did she say "maybe it wasn't true".

Astralitzia · 14/05/2023 14:42

Neopolitan · 14/05/2023 14:39

Sorry people are calling you a liar, @QueenCamilla . How dare they, they have absolutely no right. I think they are convincing themselves it's a lie, because they don't want to confront the truth. It's easy to dismiss evidence than face the fact you're ignorant and naive to what is actually happening. It's a way for them to brainwash themselves into denying the truth. I believe you. I think many of us learned how to put condoms on bananas in sex ed, with your mouth is just the next step considering they discuss oral sex in sex ed (which I don't have a problem with the discussion of oral sex per se, in high school sex ed).

Everyone has the right to call out misinformation and lies.

Her story is not "evidence" any more than me saying "my cousin's friends dog saw @Neopolitan nicking an old woman's handbag" is evidence. Unsubstantiated posts on social media are not evidence.

Astralitzia · 14/05/2023 14:40

Neopolitan · 14/05/2023 14:32

Why are you, @Astralitzia and @ZittingBiting so sure it didn't happen? Are you calling @QueenCamilla a liar? Her niece told her. Do you usually go around calling people liars and dismissing their experiences? I don't think you have the right do invalidate anyone's testimony and accuse them of lying because it contradicts your niavety.

When I was at school admittedly near 3 decades ago, we were shown how to put condoms on bananas. The condoms could have been latex or latex-free, I don't remember, no one knew about, or gave a shit about, 'latex allergies' back then. It's not a stretch to imagine the way society/teachers are these days that they would learn to put them on with their mouths given oral sex is used as part of sexual education.

It's not testimony, it's a post on social media.

Yes, I do say she's lying (or has been misinformed).

No school would teach a 14 year old to put on a condom with their mouth. If they were, it would have been all over the news and that teacher would rightly have been fired.

ZittingBiting · 14/05/2023 14:39

Neopolitan · 14/05/2023 14:32

Why are you, @Astralitzia and @ZittingBiting so sure it didn't happen? Are you calling @QueenCamilla a liar? Her niece told her. Do you usually go around calling people liars and dismissing their experiences? I don't think you have the right do invalidate anyone's testimony and accuse them of lying because it contradicts your niavety.

When I was at school admittedly near 3 decades ago, we were shown how to put condoms on bananas. The condoms could have been latex or latex-free, I don't remember, no one knew about, or gave a shit about, 'latex allergies' back then. It's not a stretch to imagine the way society/teachers are these days that they would learn to put them on with their mouths given oral sex is used as part of sexual education.

Because it isn't true. It's not in any sex Ed curriculum and Queen Camilla backtracked and said 'maybe it wasn't true'

It's nothing to do with 'naivety'. It's knowing what happens in schools and 14 year olds at no pont in UK schools ever have been taught to simulate oral sex on a banana as part of sex Ed.

There's a difference between naivety and not believing any old shit anonymous people say in the Internet to back up their crazy posts.

Yes, I will absolutely invalidate people lying on the Internet about important subjects like what is being taught in schools when it's not true.

Neopolitan · 14/05/2023 14:39

QueenCamilla · 14/05/2023 12:39

@Astralitzia
@TheShellBeach

Happened indeed. Well, I wasn't there but the 14yo was. A school in Kent.
We were gobsmacked but the actual family found it somewhat amusing.

Just as well it wasn't my child.

P. S.

I also love that's it's two of you calling fiction. How predictable... You wouldn't want to know it as it's exposing your "boundary teaching" for boundary eroding that it is, right?

Hands off my children!!!! 😡

Sorry people are calling you a liar, @QueenCamilla . How dare they, they have absolutely no right. I think they are convincing themselves it's a lie, because they don't want to confront the truth. It's easy to dismiss evidence than face the fact you're ignorant and naive to what is actually happening. It's a way for them to brainwash themselves into denying the truth. I believe you. I think many of us learned how to put condoms on bananas in sex ed, with your mouth is just the next step considering they discuss oral sex in sex ed (which I don't have a problem with the discussion of oral sex per se, in high school sex ed).

Littlefish · 14/05/2023 14:36

QueenCamilla · 14/05/2023 12:18

And to those naively trusting that the sex education lessons won't cross any boundaries... Here's an activity from one of those lessons as experienced by my 14 yo niece about 5 years ago:

When taught about safe sex, they (girl pupils) had to put a condom onto a banana.... With their mouth.

It's most likely a mixed class now, if the current state of sex-politics is anything to go by.

Absolute bullshit.

YetAnotherSpartacus · 14/05/2023 14:35

I'm getting a screaming urge to watch the Goodies Sex Education episode.

Neopolitan · 14/05/2023 14:33

TheShellBeach · 14/05/2023 14:29

All babies do it.

No, that is misinformation. Not "all" babies do it. Some do, but not all.

Neopolitan · 14/05/2023 14:32

TheShellBeach · 14/05/2023 12:25

What absolute nonsense.
This did not happen.

Why are you, @Astralitzia and @ZittingBiting so sure it didn't happen? Are you calling @QueenCamilla a liar? Her niece told her. Do you usually go around calling people liars and dismissing their experiences? I don't think you have the right do invalidate anyone's testimony and accuse them of lying because it contradicts your niavety.

When I was at school admittedly near 3 decades ago, we were shown how to put condoms on bananas. The condoms could have been latex or latex-free, I don't remember, no one knew about, or gave a shit about, 'latex allergies' back then. It's not a stretch to imagine the way society/teachers are these days that they would learn to put them on with their mouths given oral sex is used as part of sexual education.

ZittingBiting · 14/05/2023 14:32

CoffeeYes · 14/05/2023 14:25

I started my period in Y6 so learning about puberty near the end of Year 4 (so age 8-9) is fine. No need to discuss sex until this time. No need to discuss masturbation at all. You’re doing the right thing by telling children to take their hands out of the pants. I don’t agree with the WHO who want young children to learn about masturbation. They can figure that out as teens.

The WHO doesn't want that.

ZittingBiting · 14/05/2023 14:31

CheeseTouch · 14/05/2023 14:22

All current WHO document versions are on the WHO’s own website. If it’s current, it will be there. Can you find the document from IMEC’s website on the WHO one? No?

Happy to be corrected by those genuinely knowledgeable about international policy, but the current guidance seems to be the 2018 one.

It is.

An organisation using a WHO logo does not mean it is a WHO publication. Especially when it clearly states the organisation that published the document and it's not the WHO.

Which has been repeatedly pointed out buy people ARE frothing about the WHO wanting children of 4 to be taught about masturbation. Which is simply not true.

TheShellBeach · 14/05/2023 14:29

CoffeeYes · 14/05/2023 14:13

I didn’t even think of touching myself down there until a couple of years into puberty. Didn’t really think of it until secondary school. If very young children are fingering themselves or touching their penis then that’s a safeguarding concern.

All babies do it.

Goodread1 · 14/05/2023 14:27

Why do children need to know be educated on stuff like this, in first place then?

I can understand better if it was teenagers being taught stuff like this.

All children need to know is their bodies are private, and that should be respected for child safety welfare protection..

CoffeeYes · 14/05/2023 14:25

IamAlso4eels · 14/05/2023 14:19

No, it's not! You'd be surprised how many times a day I have to tell children to take their hand out of their pants or to let go of the front of their pants.

As an FYI, puberty can begin as early as age 8 and children should have knowledge ahead of time about what changes will happen to them so that they're emotionally equipped when the time comes.

I started my period in Y6 so learning about puberty near the end of Year 4 (so age 8-9) is fine. No need to discuss sex until this time. No need to discuss masturbation at all. You’re doing the right thing by telling children to take their hands out of the pants. I don’t agree with the WHO who want young children to learn about masturbation. They can figure that out as teens.

Lcb123 · 14/05/2023 14:23

MolkosTeenageAngst · 14/05/2023 11:39

The WHO document is from 2010, it’s not new and it’s not setting out a new sex ed curriculum for the UK. The WHO recommends Children 0-4 should be given information about their body and normal touching etc but doesn’t say it should be taught and it doesn’t say by teachers or in schools. It means having a conversation with children within normal contexts as they arise, so if your child comments they touched their body (as pre-schoolers can and do) you respond in an age appropriate but non-shaming way that reassures them it’s okay and normal. It’s about having those conversations in age appropriate ways from the beginning rather than shutting down any body talk down until they’re older.

This. Stop spreading misinformation

CheeseTouch · 14/05/2023 14:22

DrBlackbird · 14/05/2023 14:08

ICMEC uploaded a WHO publication. Right there on the cover page it states ‘WHO’ regional office. With the WHO logo.

May I respectfully point out that the use of ad hominem attacks and use of capital letters such that it is you who might be ‘frothing’…

https://www.icmec.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/WHO-Curriculum-Matrix-for-CSE-in-Europe.pdf

All current WHO document versions are on the WHO’s own website. If it’s current, it will be there. Can you find the document from IMEC’s website on the WHO one? No?

Happy to be corrected by those genuinely knowledgeable about international policy, but the current guidance seems to be the 2018 one.

Datun · 14/05/2023 14:21

WHO has over 8000 people working for them. And it's exactly the sort of organisation whose credibility would appeal to those who have less than pure motives.

Neopolitan · 14/05/2023 14:20

TheShellBeach · 14/05/2023 13:54

Of course it isn't.
Small children masturbating is normal behaviour.

Childhood masturbation has been linked to emotional deprivation, which may in turn lead to more self-stimulation. It may also be associated with sexual abuse.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2994165/#:~:text=Childhood%20masturbation%20has%20been%20linked,lead%20to%20more%20self%2Dstimulation.&text=It%20may%20also%20be%20associated%20with%20sexual%20abuse.

https://adw.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/09/Sexual-Abuse-Indicators-Tip-Sheet.pdf

  • Sexual signs of Sexual AbuseIncreased questions about human sexuality
  • Excessive masturbation or masturbating in public

Sexual
· Over attention to adults of a particular sex
· Displaying unusual interest in the genitals of others
· Acting out adult sexual behaviour with adults, dolls or other children
· Open displays of sexuality, for example, repeated public masturbation
· Precocious knowledge of sexual matters
· Promiscuity, repetitious sexually precocious behaviour.

It's also important to know that regular frequent and prolonged masturbation can be an indication of stress or sexual abuse. I will briefly discuss these two possible underlying causes.
Children who are stressed or who have experienced any kind of trauma often develop self-stimulating behaviors such as thumb sucking, self-rocking, or masturbation. These repetitive behaviors can be an indication that a child is holding in painful emotions. If you think that your daughter is using masturbation in this way, it would be useful to look for possible sources of stress (or trauma) in her life, and to reduce stress, if possible. She would also benefit from being allowed greater freedom to release painful emotions through tears, tantrums, play, and laughter, as described in my books.
Sexual abuse is a specific kind of trauma that can lead to masturbation. Children who have been sexually abused develop a precocious awareness of their genitals and often begin to masturbate. It's important to be aware of this possible cause, especially if you notice other symptoms of sexual abuse (such as an increase in fears or nightmares, regression in toileting habits, social withdrawal, or reluctance to stay with a specific person).
If your daughter is otherwise happy and outgoing, however, and her self-stimulating behavior occurs only occasionally, you probably don't need to be too concerned about it.
http://www.awareparenting.com/answer6.htm

Infantile and early childhood masturbation: Sex hormones and clinical profile

Few studies have explored the hormonal triggers for masturbation in infants and young children. Thus, we aimed to study the sex hormones and clinical profiles of masturbating infants and young children.This case-control study involved infants and young...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2994165#:~:text=Childhood%20masturbation%20has%20been%20linked,lead%20to%20more%20self%2Dstimulation.&text=It%20may%20also%20be%20associated%20with%20sexual%20abuse.

Springissprunging · 14/05/2023 14:20

CoffeeYes · 14/05/2023 14:13

I didn’t even think of touching myself down there until a couple of years into puberty. Didn’t really think of it until secondary school. If very young children are fingering themselves or touching their penis then that’s a safeguarding concern.

How exactly are boys supposed to go to the toilet or clean themselves properly if merely touching their penis is considered a safeguarding concern

Repeatedly masturbating in public alongside other concerning behaviours is one thing, acting like a child is not allowed to touch part of their own body is a very different thing.

Swipe left for the next trending thread