Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think we cannot afford to support Ukraine anymore

905 replies

Saysomething1234 · 04/01/2023 21:38

This may be an unpopular opinion but it is annoying me to no end and NC

We have a littany of issues crying out for funding domestically - NHS broken. Economy going down the drain. Pound down 20% in one year. Public services collapsing, Education system requiring re-investment, high taxes driving talent out. We can keep blaming our politicians but someone needs to prioritise where money goes - and no one is willing to talk about this

Yet we are spending hundreds of billions in supporting Ukraine in a war which has nothing to do with us. Yes we are morally supporting them but is there no amount which will be too much? We are paying both directly (through weapons and aid) and indirectly (through huge energy subsidies - last totalling north of £200bn) - we need to stop this spending, reduce energy prices, stop this craziness

How is this war something we can afford on the basis on principles and why aren't we more aggressively pushing for a negotiated settlement?

We cannot afford this. It sucks for Ukrainians but this is not UK's bill to foot.

AIBU?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
oakleaffy · 04/01/2023 23:26

Needtoseethatbiggerpicture · 04/01/2023 23:10

avoidable deaths in NHS due to lack of money are also real people dying - british citizens

just how many British citizens do you think will die if we allow Putin to do what he wants?

You ever been to either or both Argentina or the Falklands, OP? The people on the Islands are as British as someone born and bred in London. Why would you not defend them?

One of the Paras didn’t think they were worth it, in the scheme of things.
It was his arse on the line, and all those British deaths - For a tiny rock in the Southern ocean , The Malvinas.
How can it be “ British” when it’s thousands of miles away?

Saysomething1234 · 04/01/2023 23:24

SueVineer · 04/01/2023 23:21

I doubt brexit supporters are in a majority any longer so off you toddle if that’s your logic

right. i guess i will live with the satisfaction that we are no longer in the EU. whether majority or not anymore is a figment of your imagination

FWIW - I didnt bring up brexit - others asked me how i voted when they didnt like my line of argument

OP posts:
NextPrimeMinister · 04/01/2023 23:24

China is going to be the largest economy in the world within decades. I dont think our fight in Ukraine is changing that. They have different values, and we wont be comfortable with them, but that wont matter

China is seriously weakened by their approach to Covid.

SeenAndNot · 04/01/2023 23:23

We can’t afford not to.

How would life look now if we hadn’t stopped Hitler’s March through Europe? Freedom comes at a great price sometimes.

Aroundthetwist · 04/01/2023 23:23

OP, your post has come too late - didn’t you hear, the Great British Weather has come to save the day (or rather, European weather). Russian gas is old news, it’s so warm that gas prices are plummeting - which means next winters forward gas prices are also plummeting as gas in store won’t be used up.

So this will save all the money we need for the NHS and we can to continue to aid Ukraine as is right and proper. The Cost of Living crisis will be over by Easter at this rate.

Russia’s ability to weaponise energy is seriously weakened by above-seasonal-average weather patterns. Shame you didn’t write your post two weeks ago, although it would’ve been rubbish then too. Your bot algorithms need adjusting for the weather.

Itshouldntbethisway · 04/01/2023 23:22

@LydiaBennetsUglyBonnet, exactly this, brown people's lives simply don't matter as much to the West. No sacrifices for them. I recall the racism suffered by brown students in Ukraine at the start of the war by the very same refugees we are helping now. Africa will not forget.

SueVineer · 04/01/2023 23:21

Saysomething1234 · 04/01/2023 23:17

name change is the same reason the 30% who agree with me arent posting

because the woke liberals will eat anyone alive who disagrees with them

and for those asking - yes i voted for brexit. and yes you are in the minority. deal with it. leave britain if you dont like the views of the majority as some of you have suggested to me

I doubt brexit supporters are in a majority any longer so off you toddle if that’s your logic

Saysomething1234 · 04/01/2023 23:21

MissConductUS · 04/01/2023 23:20

So you pulled "hundreds of billions" out of your arse. Got it.

ugh..read the link (reposting)

edition.cnn.com/2022/09/08/business/liz-truss-energy-price-cap-europe/index.html

OP posts:
MissConductUS · 04/01/2023 23:20

Saysomething1234 · 04/01/2023 23:06

because i understand the concept of second order effects.

So you pulled "hundreds of billions" out of your arse. Got it.

SueVineer · 04/01/2023 23:19

ImAvingOops · 04/01/2023 23:14

Chamberlain gets a bad press but it was sensible to keep Britain out of war for so long, as the country was not in a position to fight another war any earlier. It's a good thing to try to maintain peace if at all possible. Sometimes it becomes apparent that war cannot be avoided, but often it can be!

He gets a bad press because he choose to appease Hitler. If we had stood up earlier the fight would have been easier and quicker and far fewer people would have been murdered.

are you really actually defending appeasing Hitler?

Greenshake · 04/01/2023 23:18

OP, you are embarrassing yourself more and more with each post

Saysomething1234 · 04/01/2023 23:17

ilovesooty · 04/01/2023 23:10

If you really thought people should be open to accepting your "differing views" you wouldn't have found it necessary to name change.

name change is the same reason the 30% who agree with me arent posting

because the woke liberals will eat anyone alive who disagrees with them

and for those asking - yes i voted for brexit. and yes you are in the minority. deal with it. leave britain if you dont like the views of the majority as some of you have suggested to me

OP posts:
SueVineer · 04/01/2023 23:15

sunshineandsuddenshowers · 04/01/2023 23:12

That’s what Chamberlain said in 1938. Turned out that the fate of Czechoslovakia was our problem too.
we def can’t afford to keep subsidising oil companies and companies like Amazon tho! I’m sure we can find some stuff to agree on, that we can’t afford - but the defence of Ukraine is not one of those things.

Emm we are not subsidizing either Amazon or oil companies- what a weird thing to say. But absolutely we cannot afford to give up Ukraine- it is Czechoslovakia in the ww2 scenario. We should probably have stood up before now but we didn’t so we have uK now

ImAvingOops · 04/01/2023 23:14

Chamberlain gets a bad press but it was sensible to keep Britain out of war for so long, as the country was not in a position to fight another war any earlier. It's a good thing to try to maintain peace if at all possible. Sometimes it becomes apparent that war cannot be avoided, but often it can be!

Saysomething1234 · 04/01/2023 23:14

JassyRadlett · 04/01/2023 23:09

Appeasement of Putin hasn't done much to stop Russian expansionism. What's your red line, OP, in terms of Putin's goal to reunite 'greater Russia'? Russian irredentism is nothing new, and is a massively destabilising force. What are you willing to let them have, in the name of marginally cheaper energy for the next few years?

And what impact do you think further appeasement would have on China and its ambitions?

Being dependent on a despot for energy was always a risky proposition. Europe got addicted to cheap Russian gas, despite all the warnings that Russia would use it as an economic weapon. Putting that power over us back in the hands of a country whose strategic aims are directly opposed to our own doesn't feel very smart given that European
gas prices are already starting to stabilise, Nord Stream is permanently fucked and we are on a trajectory away from fossil fuels anyway. The reason our prices are so high is because we're ridiculously reliant on gas, and fossil fuel prices will always be able to be manipulated by those who have the most fossil fuels.

So we're at a fork in the road: we can convince all of Europe that we need to say sorry to that nice Mr Putin and can we have our cheap gas back please and yes we'll rebuild the pipelines at our own expense. Or we can decide to get out of fossil fuels in favour of cheaper energy sources that aren't reliant on high levels of imported fuels.

Gas prices were soaring before the war - that's why so many energy suppliers went bust. The structure of the global economy means they're probably not likely to go back to pre-Covid levels any time soon, especially with China ending its zero Covid policy. Cosying up to Putin again in the hopes of pre-2021 gas prices is a pipe dream.

You make interesting points. I do think the world is moving towards multi polarity and the russia-china nexus wont just go away because we dont like it.

China is going to be the largest economy in the world within decades. I dont think our fight in Ukraine is changing that. They have different values, and we wont be comfortable with them, but that wont matter.

at some point we will have to make peace with it. because economics will trump everything and europe (incl UK) will not have the wealth to defend things on the basis of morals.

OP posts:
Soothsayer1 · 04/01/2023 23:14

We are caught between the devil and the deep blue sea😐

Mulhollandmagoo · 04/01/2023 23:14

Saysomething1234 · 04/01/2023 22:18

because of short sightedness of politicians to fight a ruinous war - also because diplomacy doesn't sell in the public's eyes, aggressive right wing bravado macho-ism does (as can be seen clearly in this thread) where everything is black and white

I'm sorry.....you're calling other posters right wing??? Sounds like you turned to the right and took a running jump off the wing! Let me guess OP, you want your country back? Britain is for the British? 🙄

Also, please stop bringing up the energy crisis and blaming Ukraine, the energy companies have made far more in profit off our backs than the government has spent on supporting Ukraine. If you want to blame anyone for your massive leccy bill, blame them, the ultra rich who have spotted an opportunity to become even richer at our expense!

PineCone74 · 04/01/2023 23:13

ilovesooty · 04/01/2023 23:10

If you really thought people should be open to accepting your "differing views" you wouldn't have found it necessary to name change.

Indeed!

sunshineandsuddenshowers · 04/01/2023 23:12

That’s what Chamberlain said in 1938. Turned out that the fate of Czechoslovakia was our problem too.
we def can’t afford to keep subsidising oil companies and companies like Amazon tho! I’m sure we can find some stuff to agree on, that we can’t afford - but the defence of Ukraine is not one of those things.

JassyRadlett · 04/01/2023 23:11

Saysomething1234 · 04/01/2023 23:06

because i understand the concept of second order effects.

<cough>China<cough>

Needtoseethatbiggerpicture · 04/01/2023 23:10

avoidable deaths in NHS due to lack of money are also real people dying - british citizens

just how many British citizens do you think will die if we allow Putin to do what he wants?

You ever been to either or both Argentina or the Falklands, OP? The people on the Islands are as British as someone born and bred in London. Why would you not defend them?

ilovesooty · 04/01/2023 23:10

Saysomething1234 · 04/01/2023 22:31

Please learn to accept differing views. your inability to discuss something and resort to asking me to leave the UK only shows your inability to process differing opinions.

should everyone who disagrees with this uk spending on the war leave? all of us should be stripped of British citizenship?

ffs

If you really thought people should be open to accepting your "differing views" you wouldn't have found it necessary to name change.

JassyRadlett · 04/01/2023 23:09

Appeasement of Putin hasn't done much to stop Russian expansionism. What's your red line, OP, in terms of Putin's goal to reunite 'greater Russia'? Russian irredentism is nothing new, and is a massively destabilising force. What are you willing to let them have, in the name of marginally cheaper energy for the next few years?

And what impact do you think further appeasement would have on China and its ambitions?

Being dependent on a despot for energy was always a risky proposition. Europe got addicted to cheap Russian gas, despite all the warnings that Russia would use it as an economic weapon. Putting that power over us back in the hands of a country whose strategic aims are directly opposed to our own doesn't feel very smart given that European
gas prices are already starting to stabilise, Nord Stream is permanently fucked and we are on a trajectory away from fossil fuels anyway. The reason our prices are so high is because we're ridiculously reliant on gas, and fossil fuel prices will always be able to be manipulated by those who have the most fossil fuels.

So we're at a fork in the road: we can convince all of Europe that we need to say sorry to that nice Mr Putin and can we have our cheap gas back please and yes we'll rebuild the pipelines at our own expense. Or we can decide to get out of fossil fuels in favour of cheaper energy sources that aren't reliant on high levels of imported fuels.

Gas prices were soaring before the war - that's why so many energy suppliers went bust. The structure of the global economy means they're probably not likely to go back to pre-Covid levels any time soon, especially with China ending its zero Covid policy. Cosying up to Putin again in the hopes of pre-2021 gas prices is a pipe dream.

Greenshake · 04/01/2023 23:07

overworkedovertaxed · 04/01/2023 23:01

@Greenshake Because it might anger a nuclear power?

There was a little matter of Russian missiles on Cuba that didn't end well. Would the US be happy with Mexico or Canada hosting the Chinese military or would they be unwise to build such alliances?

Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan show how adding enormous amounts of military hardware and regime change work really well.

That’s a reductive and inadequate argument

SueVineer · 04/01/2023 23:06

Saysomething1234 · 04/01/2023 22:54

Falkland islands, if you must ask. if it saves the rest of the country.

Falkland Islands are not part of the uk though.

ultimately we can’t afford not to support the Ukrainians at this stage. If Russia win that will have huge global consequences. That’s why the war is so important and why we need to support Ukraine. It’s not for the good of the Ukrainian people- let’s not kid ourselves. We did nothing for the georgians, Chechnyans, etx