Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be upset that toilets at primary school turned mixed sex without being told

60 replies

Whatonearthisgoingonhere · 05/10/2022 15:03

Aibu to be a bit upset and discombobulated to have learnt that the toilets at my child's primary school have been mixed sex for some time now. This seems like a significant change to have happened without consulting or letting parents know. Is there anything I can do about this? Do I just need to get over it and accept that this is the world now? My child has said they much prefer the way it used to be.

Has anyone challenged this with any success?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
BushBabay · 06/06/2024 13:38

For hygiene reasons alone I would be extremely unhappy about this, I would not want my daughter sitting on urine boys spread every where.

Merrymumoftwo · 05/10/2022 21:37

In Primary my daughter was in a class of 7, Autism unit, one other girl besides her, both started to develop breasts at 8. Even though the class were taught together about puberty it did not stop those two girls getting comments. So much so neither would use the legal mixed toilet. The comments were always challenged by teachers.

By 9 the other girl was having periods and she ended up out of school during that time as she came to terms with the changes. My daughter eventually started periods at 11. She still refuses to use the toilet and is uncomfortable around any male.

some children may be okay in mixed facilities but not all are, is it not kinder to provide a choice so children can be comfortable and feel heard, building confidence, rather than grow afraid or anxious?

Whatwouldscullydo · 05/10/2022 21:23

But girls do share. They share classes and . They share activities etc

But they should not be forced to share spaces when they are vulnerable such as when they are removing layers if clothing to use a toilet.

We have not eliminated all the harm boys and men can cause to women and girls. So why should girls be put at risk so parents can pay themselves on the back at sone false idea of " equality "

Statistically there is a rape a day IN SCHOOLS. Including primary schools.

Sarasandman · 05/10/2022 21:17

Whatwouldscullydo · 05/10/2022 20:26

Seems an extreme length to go to rather than I dunno, acknowledging the 2 sexes have different needs and providing separate spaces that accommodate those needs.

What benefit is it to girls to share with boys?

Its apparently beneficial to boys so they learn about periods. What do girls get out of it?

Teaching boys (and girls) about gender stereotypes, sex differences (including periods) and how to differentiate between the two, puberty, how to hold and respect boundaries...
These things should be taught at a young age.
Personally I found it a huge benefit as a child to share with boys and girls (bedrooms, tents, toilets though not cubicles) because it meant I grew up seeing us as equals and human, rather than othering the opposite sex.

TugboatAnnie · 05/10/2022 20:51

Having worked in KS1 for 20 years, the boys' toilets are covered in piss by 10.00 unless strictly checked. Eg, one in and out, then checked. Impossible if only one adult!Seats, floor, walls, you name it! Wherever they can aim is fair game. Anywhere but the urinals. The stench is awful and not fair on girls who have to sit down.

ChelseaRobertsofMalibu · 05/10/2022 20:43

MooseBreath · 05/10/2022 15:23

Considering primary-aged children change for PE in the same room as the opposite sex in KS1 and most haven't hit puberty until secondary, I can't get too worked up about it, especially for the little ones. They're not at risk of sexual assault like they would be in a secondary school or in a bathroom shared with adults. As long as cubicles are private, they're reasonable.

Shockingly, in my town a council run school just had to close down after a four year old little girl was sexually assaulted by a six year old boy in mixed sex toilets. It happened about 2 years ago now. Almost every parent removed their child (unsurprisingly) so the council shut the school

RichardBarrister · 05/10/2022 20:27

That’s shocking. Sadly many schools seem to be in a push to do this even though it is miserable for most kids esp girls and unlawful.

The School Premises Regulations 2012 reg 4 is very clear. Single sex from the age of 8 unless a proper unisex room (the accessible type with handwash). Do not let them fob you off by pretending a cubicle is actually a room - a cubicle is a cubicle and not a room.

Boys and girls are separated at that age for good reasons. Girls start getting their periods and both sexes start becoming aware if their physical differences. Mixed sex cubicles teaches the children that their personal boundaries for privacy from the opposite sex will not be respected. It is the antithesis of the boundaries and consent taught in PSHE.

I am horrified that schools are doing this to kids. Police can’t prosecute more than 1.4% of all rapes, there are 200+ rapes reported each year in schools and yet they deliberately erode boundaries and remove safeguarding.

Whatwouldscullydo · 05/10/2022 20:26

Sarasandman · 05/10/2022 20:11

It could be made a requirement for school attendance.

Seems an extreme length to go to rather than I dunno, acknowledging the 2 sexes have different needs and providing separate spaces that accommodate those needs.

What benefit is it to girls to share with boys?

Its apparently beneficial to boys so they learn about periods. What do girls get out of it?

Stroopwaffle5000 · 05/10/2022 20:14

DD10 would flat out refuse to use mixed sex toilets at school!

Sarasandman · 05/10/2022 20:11

Whatwouldscullydo · 05/10/2022 19:45

But that's down to parents ams teachers. Not 8 and 9 year old girls trying desperately to get to grips with it themselves to teach boys by osmosis at the cost of their private spaces.

It could be made a requirement for school attendance.

ArabellaScott · 05/10/2022 20:10

This is going against Health and Safety, Building Regulations, and the specific rules for schools, OP. So, no, YANBU, the school is well out of order.

Abraxan · 05/10/2022 19:50

properdoughnut · 05/10/2022 15:25

Why can't it be single sex/gender? I'm missing something?

Sex and gender are different. Which do you mean?

JunebuginDecember · 05/10/2022 19:50

There's literally no problem here...

Abraxan · 05/10/2022 19:50

MooseBreath · 05/10/2022 15:23

Considering primary-aged children change for PE in the same room as the opposite sex in KS1 and most haven't hit puberty until secondary, I can't get too worked up about it, especially for the little ones. They're not at risk of sexual assault like they would be in a secondary school or in a bathroom shared with adults. As long as cubicles are private, they're reasonable.

Most girls will start the first stages of puberty during key stage 2.
Several girls will begin their periods before they finish primary school. This is not uncommon and well within the norm. At least 1/3 of the girls in DD's primary school class began their periods by the end of yea 6, some early. Almost all had started puberty and were showing physical signs of puberty, a number from year 3 onwards.

Key stage 1 - I'd have no issues generally with single sex changing and toilets.

Key stage 2 - I am very much if the opinion that changing for people should be single sex, or at a minimum a private space for those not happy to change in front of the opposite sec. And toilets should have single sex provision too, along with bins for sanitary protection, etc.

EmeraldShamrock1 · 05/10/2022 19:49

Yanbu. It's the future unfortunately. 😔

Whatwouldscullydo · 05/10/2022 19:45

But that's down to parents ams teachers. Not 8 and 9 year old girls trying desperately to get to grips with it themselves to teach boys by osmosis at the cost of their private spaces.

Sarasandman · 05/10/2022 19:39

FernPotts · 05/10/2022 16:29

Small children are not the best judges of what's a good idea, or a safe system, or most dignified for others.

That's not your fault as a child; it would be a shame if children were blamed for their immaturity. It's the job of adults to keep them safe.

I was a very active feminist at primary school age and against the view that boys and girls are different due to their sex.
I was also very angry when adults tried to force me into the boys' toilets because I had shirt hair and wore trousers or tried to force my brothers into girls' toilets when they had long hair. So we and our friends decided to break down the divide by using whichever toilets we felt like using.
I would have been angry also at the gender essentialism expressed by some trans views (George in Famous Five was very wrong for thinking she had to be a bit if she liked doing cool stuff!) and soperhaps, had that issue been widespread then, would have reverted to backing sex-based toilets. Things have changed now and I can see that emphasising biological difference while calling out gender stereotypes or faux science claiming innate character differences etc. might be a priority.
I'm not sure that teaching children to hide from the opposite sex is the way forward though. Wouldn't it be better if males were aware of periods and the like from an early age? My sons certainly are as they've seen them and I've explained them to them since they were three.

Whatwouldscullydo · 05/10/2022 19:23

Ohthiscantbeit · 05/10/2022 19:04

What would work well is to have a male toilet, female toilet and then mixed toilet. That way everyone is catered for

Surely all children are entitled to the same levels of safeguarding?

Why are some not worthy of the same safety privacy and dignity the single aex facilities offer?

All children have a sex. Whether they like it or not.

Wht are adults so keen.to remove boundaries. Who benefits?

Ohthiscantbeit · 05/10/2022 19:04

What would work well is to have a male toilet, female toilet and then mixed toilet. That way everyone is catered for

Riapia · 05/10/2022 18:59

It must be horrible to not know what toilet to use if you are transgender

FFS

TeenDivided · 05/10/2022 18:38

@FarmerRefuted No one has objected because what you have described is fine and legal.

She 'sheer wokery' comes about when schools rebadge facilities which do not meet those standards because Stonewall or a similar organisation has said they should in order to be kind to a child who has been told it's OK for gender to override sex based safeguarding.

FarmerRefuted · 05/10/2022 18:32

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

In what way is it sheer wokery?

DC school with the toilets in the cloakrooms are self-contained cubicles with handwashing facilities inside. It's a relatively new build (c. 15yrs old) and open plan in design. The children are aged 9 and to 13.

DC who go to the older-built school are aged 3 to 9. EYFS (age 3 to 5) are in a newer built, separate unit. The toilets in there are small sized and are mixed sex as is typical for that age. The rest of the school use the mixed sex toilets at either end of the school as described in my post. The toilets have floor to ceiling doors. There is a self-contained accessible toilet available next to the office too. Weirdly no one has raised any issues about this set up.

ReeDeeHee · 05/10/2022 17:44

Pineappleflowers · 05/10/2022 16:19

How does self-contained floor to ceiling doors work with four year olds who lock themselves in and won’t/ can’t come out? Or special needs kids who get stuck in there? Or children who get ill and faint? Toilets were designed with a gap under the door for safety reasons, it’s not decorative.

Why should the original safety design be made less safe to indulge the desire of some males to intrude into female soaces where they aren’t welcome?

You can get toilets with locks that can be opened from the outside quite easily if you know how to. They manage it on hospital wards, care homes, etc.

SerenaVanDerWoodsenHumphrey · 05/10/2022 17:30

Whatonearthisgoingonhere -- Here's a very recent thread from the Feminism board which may be useful.

The OP has put her own inquiry/complaint letter in the first post, with references to the specific laws that come into play and questions regarding the reasons for the change and what risk assessments were done, and offers its use as template or starting point for anyone who needs it: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4628218-they-have-turned-the-toilets-at-my-daughters-school-mixed-sex

ilovepuppies2019 · 05/10/2022 17:14

MooseBreath · 05/10/2022 15:23

Considering primary-aged children change for PE in the same room as the opposite sex in KS1 and most haven't hit puberty until secondary, I can't get too worked up about it, especially for the little ones. They're not at risk of sexual assault like they would be in a secondary school or in a bathroom shared with adults. As long as cubicles are private, they're reasonable.

I hate this untrue message that girls won't hit puberty until high school so there's no need to even think about it. My PS took this attitude and there were no disposal bins for sanitary pads and no accommodations. I had my period and a bra in year 5 (Australia but I think that's primary school in most places). This is not so uncommon and needs to be taken seriously. Treating young girls in the most vulnerable stage of their lives as though they're an inconvenience, are doing something wrong by developing or should just be more like boys is awful. Late primary school should be setting the stage for testing girls respectfully by having separate toilets, changing areas and accommodating all period needs early. Separate bathrooms needs to be no later than year 3 so they girls can mature into bras and periods with privacy and dignity. It's an awful thought that young girls could be embarrassed by their own development because they have no privacy.