Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that JK Rowling is being very unfairly treated.

307 replies

Impatiens · 29/01/2021 19:22

For some people the name JK Rowling seems to have become a byword for 'bigot' or 'transphobe' - you only have to mention her name on twitter to cause a storm of accusations and abuse about her and I think it's really unjust.

This week it was announced that a new Harry Potter TV series is in development. Cue howls of outrage from certain people, repeating the same insults and even accusing her of being a bad influence on children. I feel so bad for her. She's always been someone who seemed to want to do good with her wealth and whose books (whether you like them or not) sent a positive message about the need to fight against evil.

A very brief recap of things Rowling has said about the trans debate that have caused anger -

  1. Human biological sex can't be changed (females can't become males/vice versa) and no one should lose their job for saying that.
  1. The word 'Woman' is being erased, particularly from important health messages that only affect females, and replaced with dehumanising terms like 'menstruators', 'cervix-havers' etc
  1. Children/young people who have Gender Dysphoria/Identify as Transgender, shouldn't be given medication as part of any treatment because they're too young to understand the potential side effects.

YABU = JK Rowling's comments were offensive and she deserves the abuse she gets
YANBU = JK Rowling's comments were respectful opinions and she's entitled to voice them without getting abuse.

OP posts:
ToadsThePeanutButterSnob · 29/01/2021 22:24

@midgedude

No you should say what specific views you think are transphobic
Nobody who claims she is transphobic seem to be able to do this. I wonder why.
CorvusPurpureus · 29/01/2021 22:23

She's bloody awesome. I enjoyed her books, & whilst she clearly raided quite a few other authors I'd rate more for literary merit, they were thumpingly good page turners, which my own young dc, & many of the students I teach, found to be a gateway into reading Proper Big Books.

So I was generally admiring & well disposed, but THEN she spoke out of the GC issue. Kindly, wisely, & bravely.

For that, I admire her immensely. Also, someone in her office sends lovely replies if you email in support - my youngest got a name check - along the lines of 'JK says hi to & good luck with ' - & was possibly the most chuffed 11yo in Chuffedville.

She's a good egg, & I think history will reflect that.

ToadsThePeanutButterSnob · 29/01/2021 22:22

@SionnachRua again which of her views are transphobic? Which part of what she said about bathrooms do you disagree with?

Thewithesarehere · 29/01/2021 22:21

Puberty blockers will allow them to transition to the person they want to be and not stick out for their whole lives as some kind of oddity.
Whoever posted this gem, please also post the original paper of the registrational clinical trials that were conducted before approval of this use of these drugs.

midgedude · 29/01/2021 22:21

No you should say what specific views you think are transphobic

SionnachRua · 29/01/2021 22:19

@Impatiens

I've never personally thought of her as a bigot - I reserve that for Linehan and co - but I would probably call her views transphobic and disappointing, yes. Which is not something I want to support. Just as I wouldn't buy from Jeffree Star.

I'm not familiar with Jeffree Star, sorry.

Isn't there a gulf between not wanting to support someone and thinking they're transphobic? To me, an accusation of 'transphobia' is a very serious issue because it's basically saying you have hatred and disgust for trans people.

Well, you did ask me if I thought her views were transphobic? I do. I'm not sure what else I can say about that one. And as her views are so against my own values, I don't want to support her. The two things are very much intertwined.

It doesn't mean I think she's an evil person or anything, I just strongly disagree with some views she has. I'm sure she does a lot of great other stuff.

JStar is worth a read up on btw if you enjoy internet rabbit holes but he's really just an example name. I can swap him out for Mike Lindell, the MyPillow guy if that makes more sense? I would never buy from him due to his Trump support.

sanluca · 29/01/2021 22:19

It’s not primarily to do with preferring stereotypical activities of the other sex.

It actually is. 6 out of 8 checks for confirming if a child is transgender has to do with playing with children of the opposite sex, playing with toys of the opposite sex or wearing clothes meant for the opposite sex. 2 out of 8 have to do with not liking your body, very normal for children especially starting puberty, or feeling distress over your body. Later two are not mandatory to have before you can be affirmed as transgender.

Did you know Dutch treatment, the one everyone else always refers to because they came up with the treatment with puberty blockers, don't start treatment for children who say they are transgende around puberty as that time of life is just too confusing for all children and they don't want to make mistakes?

ToadsThePeanutButterSnob · 29/01/2021 22:19

There used to be a regular poster on here who took puberty blockers for a short time as an adult and was quite vocal about the fact they had destroyed her health. She regretted taking them and was horrified by the fact that they were being given to children with no thought to the lasting consequences to their health.

midgedude · 29/01/2021 22:18

Where does itv end ? Medically treating people to be who they want to be ? Why is it not considered just cosmetic surgery?

Impatiens · 29/01/2021 22:16

Puberty blockers will allow them to transition to the person they want to be and not stick out for their whole lives as some kind of oddity.

How will puberty blockers do that? They can't make someone change sex.

Also what will the other consequences be? A lifetime of ill-health? That's not something a young person can possibly comprehend or properly consent to.

OP posts:
samanthawashington · 29/01/2021 22:16

Agree with her all the way. It's madness to say trans women are the same as biological women

BudgieHammockBananaSmuggler · 29/01/2021 22:15

[quote JoodyBlue]@BudgieHammockBananaSmuggler what did we did do before there were puberty blockers available?[/quote]
People born as men lived their whole lives as females but were laughed at and ostracised because they looked weird. For example.

Impatiens · 29/01/2021 22:12

I've never personally thought of her as a bigot - I reserve that for Linehan and co - but I would probably call her views transphobic and disappointing, yes. Which is not something I want to support. Just as I wouldn't buy from Jeffree Star.

I'm not familiar with Jeffree Star, sorry.

Isn't there a gulf between not wanting to support someone and thinking they're transphobic? To me, an accusation of 'transphobia' is a very serious issue because it's basically saying you have hatred and disgust for trans people.

OP posts:
Thewithesarehere · 29/01/2021 22:12

I genuinely couldn't care less whether or not people can physically change sex. Doesn't matter to me. Can they change chromosomes and thus change sex? Nope. I'm still happy to call them women.

But in real life, things don’t stop here.
Would you like your daughter to play rugby against a trans woman? Do you know the chances of injury? You are ok with that?

Do you want your daughter to compete in other sports with a trans woman having an absolute advantage even before the competition starts?

And that is just tip of the iceberg.

ToadsThePeanutButterSnob · 29/01/2021 22:11

@SionnachRua okay but which of her views are transphobic? You mentioned her views on bathrooms earlier so I posted the extract from her essay where she mentions bathrooms. What specifically from that extract about bathrooms do you disagree with?

BudgieHammockBananaSmuggler · 29/01/2021 22:11

@LAgeDeRaisin

Some children clearly identify as the opposite biological sex and live that way throughout their childhood and I think it may be appropriate to have puberty blockers

But what does that even mean? How can you identify as the opposite sex as a child? When I was young some girls had short hair and liked football. Some boys did gymnastics. They were still female or male. What can a boy do or be as a child that a girl can't, and thus means she has to identify as a boy? How can they possibly underatand the complex social implications of being either male or female? How does liking stereotypically male or female activities have any bearing on anything at all, apart, perhaps, from a societal need to stop seeing ponies as for girls and rugby for boys.

The prospect of the medical side of this, as a doctor, really concerns me.

Well maybe ‘identify’ was the wrong word to use as it too associated with the adolescent gender dysphoria about which I have already expressed my concern.

It’s not primarily to do with preferring stereotypical activities of the other sex. It is more of a feeling that is hard to define. If you feel like the sex you are born to it’s maybe impossible to truly understand.

A significant proportion of young children do revert back to their biological sex after a couple of years or so. However there are some that from as soon as they can talk express the view that they are a different sex and this persists throughout their childhood and adolescent. This is not going to change. Puberty blockers will allow them to transition to the person they want to be and not stick out for their whole lives as some kind of oddity. It’s a tiny percentage. Hence why it needs a critical review rather than the gender-affirmation ethos that characterises gender identity clinics and gender issue psychologists today

gruffalo28 · 29/01/2021 22:10

This is a social media board that is mainly female. You are slightly preaching to the converted. I obviously voted YANBU. I wish that there could be rational debate about this without the calls of bigotry because I support both women's right and trans rights and it is not necessary for the two to clash. There just need to be respect from the general population about the needs of trans people (a safe third space, the right to their own pronoun, not to suffer abuse for ho they dress/act etc) but at the same time respect for the genuine needs of women to have women only spaces, their own sex and protection from male violence. I can't see how two groups who have both had their rights trampled upon can not simply try to work with each other. Women fear male abusers using the self-identification legialstion to enter women only spaces and prey upon vulnerable females. Surely trans-women would detest the same thing?
To be a woman (or at least for a woman like me approaching 50) there has always seemed to be a need to accept that physically you are weaker (albeit mentally you are usually stronger) than the men around you and your biology prevents you (sometimes) from achieving the same thing as you might if you are a male (glass ceilings, childbirth etc). I would think part of becoming a genuine woman, for a trans woman is to understand that, understand the specific restrictions/vulnerabilities of the sex you would like to become/identify as and support the concerns they have. I don't think it makes you less of a woman to identify with the concerns of other women. (I am an educated woman of independent means who can earn a huge salary if I wish to and I would never have an abortion - I have no need to support child maintenance laws, domestic violence laws, equality in divorce laws, the right to abortion etc but I do because I am a woman and other women need that protection due to the circumstances they were born in/find themselves in. Usually because of their biology as the person that bears children. I will always protest against the rights of the patriarchy to protect other women. I owe that to myself, my daughters, my mother and my grandmother. In fact if you identify as part of my gender/sex I feel it is your very responsibility to think about this. Think about why a 13 year old child, a rape victim, a female prisoner might be frightened to find someone with a penis in their personal, private space when they may have suffered intimidation from men in other contexts. This is where I think the militant trans lobby are not acting like "women". Equally is there more that feminists could do to try to reach out to young trans-women already "othered" by changing sex. Should we really be havign a rights based discourse which is the language of men but should we instead be having a discourse based more upon collaboration.

SionnachRua · 29/01/2021 22:10

@Impatiens

Btw, I'm well aware that there will probably be an avalanche of replies. I've seen how these threads play out, I know it's a circular conversation at best - and sometimes not even a conversation, just people scoring points. I've no interest in wasting my Friday night on it so I won't engage.

Seems an odd thing to say after engaging but..ok. Confused

It isn't aimed at you but I have seen plenty of these threads where people just engage in cheap point scoring. I'll ignore those quite happily.

Tbh I will probably head off soon enough as I'm a glass and a half of wine in and want to watch Drag Race.

midgedude · 29/01/2021 22:10

Bike and bigot?!

Reminds me of the old joke about Microsoft and the colours black and white

Impatiens · 29/01/2021 22:09

Rowling has had a brutal time with the media and public recently, for basically saying what most of us are thinking.

This is what's so unbearable - she's basically being hung out to dry because others are too cowardly to stand up and speak their minds. I was heartened to see Eddie Izzard supporting her (despite him being a bit of a wazzock in other ways) but so few have.

Worse actually - people who she once knew well and who basically owe their careers to her, like Emma Watson and Daniel Radcliffe, chose to stab her in the back when she was already facing a storm of abuse. Angry

OP posts:
KeepWashingThoseHands · 29/01/2021 22:09

Black people have been subjected to systemic racism - for centuries. It’s interesting that a relatively ‘new’ minority group has been able to aggressively assert its rights so quickly, by imposing on another group that has similarly faced oppression in various forms - for centuries.

Then you realise that group is mostly men and all your questions are answered.

SionnachRua · 29/01/2021 22:09

[quote Impatiens]**@SionnachRua

Thanks. So do you consider her views to be bigoted and/or transphobic?[/quote]
She's an interesting one because I feel she puts a very civil, eloquent veneer on the absolute bile spewed on some forums. Not that she's deliberately doing that, I just feel she's socially palatable in a way that Graham Linehan (for example) isn't.

I've never personally thought of her as a bigot - I reserve that for Linehan and co - but I would probably call her views transphobic and disappointing, yes. Which is not something I want to support. Just as I wouldn't buy from Jeffree Star.

KeepWashingThoseHands · 29/01/2021 22:04

YANBU

FrostyChocolateMilkshake · 29/01/2021 22:03

YANBU OP.

Rowling has had a brutal time with the media and public recently, for basically saying what most of us are thinking.

Whatever happened to "freedom of speech" 🤔

Impatiens · 29/01/2021 22:02

Btw, I'm well aware that there will probably be an avalanche of replies. I've seen how these threads play out, I know it's a circular conversation at best - and sometimes not even a conversation, just people scoring points. I've no interest in wasting my Friday night on it so I won't engage.

Seems an odd thing to say after engaging but..ok. Confused

OP posts: