Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to feel uneasy about my son reading Enid Blyton books

767 replies

frances5 · 22/06/2007 22:10

My son wants me to read him a book called the "Wishing Chair", I have read two chapters of it and it has a pixie in it called "Chinky". To make it worst the drawing of "Chinky" shows an elf like creature with slitted eyes. However I think my son is totally and utter oblivous to this.

Admitally Enid Blyton lived 50 years ago when people didn't know better. But do you think I am making a mistake letting my son enjoy this book? He is even trying to read it himself that he is so desperate to know what happens next.

When my son chose this book I had no idea that it had a pixie in it called "Chinky" other wise I would have diverted him towards something like Ronald Dahl.

OP posts:
MamaMaiasaura · 22/06/2007 23:47

who me? are you

pointydog · 22/06/2007 23:47

are you apologising?

TheArmadillo · 22/06/2007 23:46

this is moving way to fast for me.

Balls · 22/06/2007 23:45

Sorry I should have added - it's flippin marvellous that he wants to read anything - encourage it.

Lauriefairycake · 22/06/2007 23:45

'Chinky' is an ELF ! a fucking fantasy creature (whispers .......it's not real)

NOT Chinese! It's only our stupid adult middle class pc bollocks thats reading something into this !!!!

and fairies with wings on their backs - it's not a comment on disabled people with humps !!

For fucks sake I've heard everything now

TheArmadillo · 22/06/2007 23:45

Banning books is wrong in hte general sense of the idea.

But in the case of a school library surely it is more that you can only hold a certain number of books so you choose the best (in your opinion) for the children. Therefore you leave out the ones you don't agree with to make space for those you do.

Also we already censure the information available to children. There are restrictions on what you can put on children's television for example, and the watershed. Films have ratings. WE choose both as a society and individuals what we feel is appropriate for children.

Not putting these books in school libraries is not the same as burning all the copies and making it an offence to own one.

zookeeper · 22/06/2007 23:45

Oh God shoot me now

MamaMaiasaura · 22/06/2007 23:44

And I didnt way you would object to MIcheal Morpurgo.

Balls · 22/06/2007 23:44

Let him read it - but introduce other books you consider more appropriate. Sounds like he is just keen to have stories.

Quattrocento · 22/06/2007 23:44

Sorry Twinkle.

Why are the books badlywritten? Aside from PC issues? Well these are the reasons I can think of:-

(a) They are formulaic. There were five in the famous five but EB famously only had three plots. An adult analogy would be Mills & Boon or Barbara Cartland with their scripted plotlines.

(b) The storylines are strictly linear. So the text only moves in one direction. Most books that stretch and develop children go forwards and backwards.

(c) The language and vocabulary is very limited. Think of the Sun. That is deliberatly written for a reading age of around 10. EB has a very limited vocabulary for children. Her sentences are very short and snipped which limits children's language development.

I could go on like this for pages but there are some essays on this. Have a look at the Wiki entry on EB, it points you to some stuff as to how EB is crap.

pointydog · 22/06/2007 23:43

fuck

I wasn't calling you a nerd

Taxi

zookeeper · 22/06/2007 23:43

If we start withdrawing books that contain phrases or concepts that may cause offence to different people then we'd have empty libraries. how depressing

pointydog · 22/06/2007 23:43

No I didn't awen. I said imagine the scenario. I imagined my child doing it. I would feel uncomfortable therefore I wouldn't want them to read the book. I was not saying your, or anyone's child specifically would do that. A child could do that

Tortington · 22/06/2007 23:42

i think the fact your child is enjoying reading through the magic of this book is the important thing.

i think if at some point he were to remark "chinky" inappropriatley you would be the first to explain to him.

and if un pc behaviour continued - i tink it less likley to be down to a book he loved and more down to parenting or lack of - in a wider context you understand.

pointydog · 22/06/2007 23:41

"But I was not being serious about calling social services on parents forcefeeding children fruitshoots. Either of the drinking or of the Enid Blyton variety."

"I think anyone with a trace of anything that might be called PC are total serious humour-bypassed nerds, quattro."

Oh I see what I have inadvertently done - har! That thing I said was backing up your point quattro, that the fruitshoot thing was just a jokey thing. I was calling you a nerd

har

I canot keep up

MamaMaiasaura · 22/06/2007 23:40

Funny thing is ds hasnt read an Enid Blyton book. But I guess what I am saying is that he might.

You implied my ds would point at a stranger in the street and call them chinky - which I find offensive. Didnt get nasty tho did i?

nooka · 22/06/2007 23:39

Yes, I love children's books - probably the main reason I had childen, as cover for buying children's books. I am "force feeding" my children Anne Fine at the moment, and waiting until they are old enough to read Dyanna Wynne Jones. Personally reading Garth Nix. EB would not get any shelf space in this household!

edam · 22/06/2007 23:39

Hey Quatro, didn't think you were being particularly crass or anything. But the idea of libraries banning books, esp. for children, makes me very uneasy.

pointydog · 22/06/2007 23:38

hang on. The people I thought I was agreing with on some level now seem to be rounding on me. Wat's going on?

Twinklemegan · 22/06/2007 23:38

WHY?
WHY?
WHY?
WHY?
WHY?

nooka · 22/06/2007 23:36

So how far does "a trace of PC" go then? Does that mean that so long as abuse of any group is funny it's OK? Little Black Sambo for example?

Quattrocento · 22/06/2007 23:36

Ooh pointydog is squaring up for a fight.

Well I won't have it. You you fruitshoot reader you.

Twinklemegan · 22/06/2007 23:35

Why QC? Why? WHY?

pointydog · 22/06/2007 23:35

errrr. you implied that me or quattro banned books and might have a good readon for slating morpurgo. Which was a ridiculous implication. SO ridiculous that I replied ironically that I do all of those thiongs.

crikey, I am on wine you kow, it is very hard for me to justify things twenty mins agter i hvae posted

Quattrocento · 22/06/2007 23:34

And I recognise a fellow bookie in nookie

Swipe left for the next trending thread