Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To not want to go to London?

31 replies

twentypence · 27/04/2007 08:38

It would mean 2.5 hours on a train each way. An hours car journey at one end and an hour crossing London at the other, and then doing it all again a couple of days later with a 4 year old. Not to mention the cost for 3 (although the NZ dollar is having a high, it's not THAT high).

When my SIL is able bodied, has no children will have quit her job and could join us instead on our lovely narrow boat, the marina is on one of the stops from the London train.

OP posts:
Oblomov · 27/04/2007 09:14

I have to take ds to Kings hospital , it is a nightmare. Car to Weybridge,. Train to Waterloo. Bus to Kings. Ds thinks its all great. But it is a total pain.
You are doing the right thing!

Oblomov · 27/04/2007 09:12

Blesss her, she doesn't have a clue. As NQC says, none of us did, did we ?

NotQuiteCockney · 27/04/2007 08:49

People without children really don't understand how hard and draining it is to travel with kids. I know I didn't, before I had kids.

twentypence · 27/04/2007 08:44

Good, it's not just me then.

OP posts:
Oblomov · 27/04/2007 08:42

No. I could be in London in 1/2 an hour , on the train. But I hardly ever go. Just not that keen.

moondog · 27/04/2007 08:39

I wouldn't even consider it.