Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to wonder if any of you have had social services involved after an accidental injury?

65 replies

MigraineMartie · 24/03/2016 07:50

Title says it all really
Just wondering as although our involvement was a long time ago and very short lived it still upsets me when I think about it - anyone else?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Angellove2024 · 13/05/2025 09:11

SSNC · 24/03/2016 09:55

Have name changed for this.

My DS was very hyperactive as a boy, he ran into a busy road. I grabbed him by the neck and grazed his neck. He was about to be hit by a car, was outside school.

Had SS arrive at home with Child Protection Police threatening to lead me out in handcuffs and warning me anything further, including "attitude ", and I'd be fully prosecuted.

Was all OK in the end?

Angellove2024 · 13/05/2025 09:09

What happened after?

MinecraftyMum · 25/03/2016 14:20

I think the reporting system is way off in some cases.

When ds1 was about 16 months, we took him to A&E twice in the space of a couple of weeks - both with bangs to the head (really big egg-sized swellings - he ran into a door frame the first time and slipped off the bottom stair the second).

Anyway, we had no action, no questions about social workers or follow ups at all. Then a month later he had a febrile convulsion, 999, ambulance, A&E, overnight stay. It was documented by the Doctors as a FC. We had a very quick checking call from the health visitor because he'd had three hospital visits in as many months. That was it.

Then two months later he had another febrile convulsion - again, ambulance, 999 etc. Clearly documented that it was a temperature related convulsion. THIS time when the HV called she was not so pleasant, very stern and advised that she was obliged to inform SS because of the number of times he'd been to hospital.

So the first two accidents - huge bangs that could have been caused by any sort of abuse - nothing. However, two uncontrollable FC's later, we tipped the balance into an unacceptable level of hospital visits and that's when they followed it up Hmm

corythatwas · 25/03/2016 13:10

Sorry, should have made myself clearer: by "under investigation" I mean an ongoing investigation, where your word is doubted and your child questioned, not a simple phone call after an accident.

corythatwas · 25/03/2016 13:07

Once you have been under investigation, especially with an older child, I think you will always been torn between being thankful that somebody cared and being aware of the damage that has actually been done to your family through the investigation itself.

SS close the case and move on, but as a parent you are left with a child who has been traumatised by having his/her story doubted and may be acting out, and at the same time you may well have to deal with suspicion and even hostility from school and other adults surrounding your child.

Dd was diagnosed aged 10. We were still dealing with the fall-out - in terms of not trusting adults outside the family, thinking she was not going to be believed, being afraid to tell when she had a flare-up - throughout her teens. I am sure the doctor who did the original questioning had no idea of the havoc he caused.

Of course I am thankful that other children are kept safe. But my child tried to kill herself. Sad

I can do "be thankful". But "just" be thankful isn't really something I can manage.

newmumwithquestions · 25/03/2016 13:02

Omg chicken I can't imagine how bad that's been. Hope you get your family back to a happy normality soon.

Pantone363 · 25/03/2016 12:53

Wow Shock

That's is terrifying, no idea how you handled that. How awful for all of you!

ChickenDrumsticks · 25/03/2016 12:14

NCd for this

I can now tell this story with a sense of relief.

Six months ago the police raided our house because they believed DH had accessed child porn. They took our phones, tablets and computers away and looked through every inch of our possessions.

DH denied it from the beginning. Apparently they had arrested a man and found a Skype conversation on his computer in which indecent images had been exchanged. The other person had hidden his IP address somehow and the only link they could find was that the email address had been set up via our IP address.

DH works from home and his job involves setting up email addresses for clients. He did set the email up but was not the one who had that Skype conversation. He handed all details of his client over to the police.

DD was under a Child in Need plan with SS. We had conferences (sitting round a table with about 10 professionals scrutinising our lives), fortnightly visits and DH wasn't allowed any unsupervised access to her. Although he explained his side of things to me and denied the charges, we decided it would be best if he lived at his mums for a while and he saw DD on an evening at our house. I wasn't even allowed to leave them in the same room as each other.

Last week the police came to our door returning our things, confirming no images had been found on any devices, no searches or anything that suggests DH is a paedophile, and that they know DH didn't have that Skype conversation, and they arrested the man who did, thanks to the info DH gave to them.

We are all back living together and it's such an amazing relief. SS no longer involved, they wrote to us commending our behaviour during this all and are confident DD is well looked after. Her school knew about it though and were involved in regular safeguarding meetings with us. I can never do drop off or pick up in the same way - even though he was never actually charged at any point I do wonder if they don't believe us anyway

I don't begrudge how things are done as I know the police and SS are only trying to protect children, but it's been a difficult and nerve wracking six months that's taken its toll on my marriage and I'm hoping we can get back to normal quickly

Brummiegirl15 · 25/03/2016 10:52

My 13 week old DD has already had 2 seizures since birth with have required admission to hospital.

We were asked both times if we had a social worker. We don't and I understand it's a standard question. But it still chills you. She had an ultrasound to make sure the seizures weren't from "damage". Which was completely clear, but again knowing they were looking to see if we had shaken her, chills me. I know it's an absolute necessity but still scared me

BertrandRussell · 25/03/2016 10:49

Social workers can't tell over the phone or on paper the difference between accident prone and being neglected or deliberately hurt.

Just be thankful your children are fine and think of the ones that aren't.

abbsismyhero · 25/03/2016 10:26

when i had a social worker my son fell over and smashed the holey fuck out of his face my social worker didnt like me and i cried for days thinking i had just given her all the ammunition she needed however when we went to conference the chair read out the report from the hospital and it stated ds gave a clear and concise report of how/where the incident occurred and we believe the injury is accidental

the advice from people who have had involvement from ss previously is this if your child can give an account themselves let them if you talk for them it will look like you're making up stories and they look closer at you and maybe see things that don't exist

StepAwayFromTheEcclesCakes · 25/03/2016 10:11

not ss but police. DS 1 was a nightmare child prone to tantrums and displays of violent anger right into his teens, he was about 14 or so and went off on one in the car with DH after football, he had no shoes on and got out of the car. DH followed him in the car and at one point tried to manhandle him back in. gave up and came home leaving DS to walk home in socks. ten mins later police at the door. someone had reported DH (gave numberplate) under suspicion of child abduction! which is fair enough as I guess its what it looked like so hats off to them for reporting. luckily for DH they believed his explanation.
and DS has actually grown up to be a reasonably pleasant human at 23, which we never thought possible, it was hell on earth bringing him up.

JoffreyBaratheon · 25/03/2016 09:04

On my frequent football injury trips to A & E with sons 4 and 5, must admit I've never been asked once if we have a social worker. Although they're teenagers now, so maybe that is just parents of younger kids? Or maybe our local hospital don't care - as the SS seem to be so inactive as to be comatose round here. My 4th son has dyspraxia and so had a lot of things like falling over in the playground at school, at primary. I think the school phoned me at least 3 times in the space of a year or two, to get there quick and I went to A & E with the Head - by the end we were joking that we did it every week. (Not quite). All his falls were at school, so again, maybe that explains why but also - never once asked if we had a social worker...

MiscellaneousAssortment · 25/03/2016 04:27

Appletise, lager, do very similar in packaging.... Wah?!

Ridiculous.

MiscellaneousAssortment · 25/03/2016 04:26

It's a horrible feeling, it feels WRONG. Instinctively and gut wrenchingly wrong. And so subjective what happened, and on the pronouncements of a medic or other professionals who get a two second snapshot to base a decision on which may save a child, or condemn a family to a very intrusive and terrifying experience.

I'm wondering what the difference was, that some people have a call from a HV, and some arrive home to the police. Scary stuff.

Btw, connective tissue disorders are mentioned in the Children's Act itself, as they are so routinely misdiagnosed as child abuse.

AlmaMartyr · 25/03/2016 03:55

It is standard to be asked if you have a social worker.

I had a HV call after DS bumped his head once but that's all. DD is horribly accident prone and has had loads of injuries, so I'm a bit surprised we haven't had any more but relieved! Last year she had a very nasty nose injury and the medical professionals were amazing, but I did notice that they always got her story first before allowing me to talk. Very sensible!

The local Children's Centre think we're terrible parent and have not only made that clear to me but informed the school. The school told them that they had no concerns and that we were excellent and engaged parents. The Children's Centre reasoning seems to be that I didn't attend their sessions (went to other groups, not that toddler groups are mandatory anyway). The things I've heard from them bear zero relation to reality - at a toddler group session (that I was running) one of them accused me of getting drunk on lager. I was having an Appletise. I still get very angry when I think about it.

Sorry, bit of a tangent there but it is awful when people are questioning whether you keep your children safe, although I appreciate it needs to happen.

summerdreams · 25/03/2016 02:16

Yes and every a&e visit your asked if you have social worker I know I am with my son and he's never been in for an injury.

summerdreams · 25/03/2016 02:11

My son went to a&e about 9 times in his first 6 months he kept turning blue due to reflux, the hv used to ring everytime with wrong information about the admission etc. When she came to see us for a pre weaning home visit or something she watched one of his episodes and sent us straight to a&e. He is still constantly in a&e at 19 months due to a blood condition I swear the hv has never bothered ringing since. Hmm

Hamishandthefoxes · 24/03/2016 23:54

We had SS involvement with DS although not because of an injury. He was with his childminder and had escaped the house while she went to the loo. He was found (aged 2) trotting down the road. SS took no further action but I left that cm (and it was made absolutely clear that I had to even if I'd thought otherwise). I've had no further contact.

StillMedusa · 24/03/2016 23:35

DD2 had four dislocations between ages 2 and 3! You know when you swing a toddler between you and they love it... oops.
Then Dh threw her in the air and as she came down her elbow dislocated.
Then her brother gave her a tug to get off the lawn... yep you guessed it.

The paed examined her thoroughly and discovered she was extremely hypermobile, with probably EDS. And showed us how to pop her elbows back in ourselves.

She's 21 now and last night rolled over in bed and her shoulder dislocated... she managed to get it back herself as she is used to it happening now although it is very painful.

The HV when she was little would always call to check she (and we ) were ok but once we had a diagnosis no one was concerned about abuse thankfully!

ByThePrickingOfMyThumbs · 24/03/2016 22:10

I think 'do you have a social worker?' is an absolutely standard and routine question simplethings. I was asked that when DD1 and I were at A&E getting checked over after being in a minor car crash (so not a situation where abuse would be on the radar). It's like asking who your GP is - something they ask everyone.

EnjoyTheSimpleThingsInLife · 24/03/2016 19:25

When my DD was 2, she fell down 3 steps leading into the garden, a nasty massive bump appeared instantly so we went to the walk in centre..I was hysterical saying I only turned my back for a second, they sent us straight to A&E (me panicking all the way thinking they would say I'd hurt her)

When the nurse saw us, she asked a few questions one of them was "Is your family involved with SS, sorry I had to ask this as a routine question"

From that question I thought SS would be in touch to find out what had happened but everyone could obviously see it was an accident.

gingermopped · 24/03/2016 18:58

Few yrs back My 18month old ds3 was chucked on sofa by ds1 (9) his arm dislocated, we had a ss visit and where basically treated like a pile of crap, took 5 months to b rid of them, was an awful time.
But my ds2 who has special need, through being the most clumsy uncoordinated child ever has broke a thumb, cut head open 4 times, chin twice and few concussions, all treated at hospital, never heard from them then!

corythatwas · 24/03/2016 18:49

We've had plenty over the years relating to dd's hypermobility syndrome. Have to say I always found SS far more professional and sensible than some members of-- the medical and teaching professions.

It was a paediatric consultant who came up with the bright idea that a child who complained of leg pains which had no visible cause must have been traumatised = sexually abused.

And a headteacher who clearly thought if you just inform the parents that you are not happy about the child needs of medical treatment then her medical problems will evaporate. (and m

SS were my support during a grim time.

JoffreyBaratheon · 24/03/2016 17:54

It's the way the SS fail kids who really need to be got out of situations, that is the worst part of it. Better to be over cautious, I'd have thought, however upsetting for people. And it might be less upsetting if they could find a better way of handling people.

My nice neighbour, the one who overheard the kid getting hurt on the BBQ, works in a children's home, and she has long felt - as I have - that these kids don't just need the odd SS visit, but active get-them-the-hell-out-of-there intervention. Third year of them being here, now, and the SS visits dried up over a year ago. The verbal and emotional) child abuse continues. The day the child was injured in a genuine accident, was a chance for intervention that was missed.

Swipe left for the next trending thread