Claiming people who highlight the risks of medical transition are just uncomfortable with anything that isn't cisheteronormative.
No mention of infection risk, ongoing need to dilate neo vaginas, phalloplasty grafts or anything whatsoever about the harm to children on puberty blockers.
No it's all dismissed as 'bigots are uncomfortable with men having breasts'.
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
Horrible BACP article obsfuscating the risks of medical transition
keikothewhale · 30/05/2023 14:33
hallouminatus · 16/06/2023 18:36
Excellent email!
However, a minor nit-pick:
The vast, vast majority of trans people do not have genital surgery. Only 2.8% have any surgery, including facial feminisation or breast surgery, the numbers having genital surgery is only a small subset of that 2.8% of trans people (2).
This is attributed to fairplayforwomen.com/penis/, using stats from GIRES, but although the FPFW article does reference GIRES, and does includes the 2.8% figure, they actually quotes a 20% estimate from GIRES, while the 2.8% figure comes from this 2016 meta-analysis: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1743609516001338
timeforsheroes · 14/06/2023 13:21
Resurrecting this thread to say I finally lowered my blood pressure enough to email Therapy Today about this absolute shitshow article. Not that they'll take any notice, but I can't not point out to them that some of us can still see the Emperor is stark bollock naked. Copied below in case anyone wants to crib or improve it for their own use.
Dear Therapy Today,
This article is at best, misguided and at worst, dangerous. I genuinely believe that therapists using this article as a source of information may do serious harm to clients. Firstly, the authors' statements are not supported by physical reality. The idea that 'people and their materially-sexed body do not fit into a hitherto binarised male/female man/woman isomorphic categorisation' is put simply, not true. Every human is biologically male or female. Including those with DSDs such as CAIS, used in this article to support the authors position despite the fact that people with DSDs have repeatedly asked that their medical conditions not be conflated with trans identities.(1)
The authors' assumptions that medical/surgical transition is a) common amongst trans people and b) desirable is again, not supported by the evidence (the authors references consisting of philosophers, self-appointed non medically trained experts and a private GP selling hormones off shore has not escaped my notice either). The vast, vast majority of trans people do not have genital surgery. Only 2.8% have any surgery, including facial feminisation or breast surgery, the numbers having genital surgery is only a small subset of that 2.8% of trans people (2). Contrary to the article, the majority of trans people are not 'waiting for surgical intervention'. The authors also airily dismiss concerns about the safety of the medications some trans people use thus: 'all of these 'harmful' characterisations stem from the...'cis' account of what 'healthy' looks like'. I don't think increased rates of osteoporosis, blood clots, infertility and heart attacks, all documented risks of cross sex hormones, are anyone's definition of healthy, and it is at best reckless to suggest that the problem lies in harmful characterisations, rather than known harmful outcomes of these drugs (3). For those who do have genital surgery, these can have serious complications, including incontinence (up to ¼ of patients in one study), inability to orgasm (up to 30%), fistulas, stenosis and even death, and many require multiple surgeries (4)
The authors also dismiss the experience of detransitioners, and cite low detransition rates using references from the aforementioned off shore GP selling hormones and EPATH, self described experts in trans care with a vested interest in encouraging transition. If therapists were to hear accounts from detransitioners, such as Ritchie Herron (5) or Scott Newgent (6), they would hear about both the huge lifelong illness burden caused by medical and surgical transition, and the failure of therapists to address their fears and uncertainties before surgery; similarly a study of detransitioners showed that 55% felt they were not properly evaluated by a doctor or mental health professional (7).
Far from destroying myths around trans care, this article is perpetuating them. Human bodies are not mix and match, or lego to be rearranged; 'affirming' medical and surgical interventions are serious, potentially dangerous and lifechanging, and we as therapists should not be opining on these to our clients, as this is outside our expertise and role. Ethical practice requires us to work within our knowledge and competence, and BACP should not be encouraging therapists to believe that it is good practice to 'affirm' interventions outside of our expertise. Therapy could have a huge role to play in supporting and valuing both trans and detrans people, but this article does nothing to inform or educate therapists on how to do that; it is purely a political statement, and one which could have serious detriment both to therapists and clients if held as good practice.
I realise that you will not be publishing this article, as it doesn't subscribe to your political viewpoint.
(1)differently-normal.com
(2)fairplayforwomen.com/penis/, using stats from GIRES
(3)statsforgender.org/medical-transition ,citing more than 15 separate studies
(4)statsforgender.org/medical-transition , citing 12 separate studies
(5)tullipr.substack.com/p/scrambled-eggs?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
(6)genderdysphoriaalliance.com/post/meet-scott-newgent
(7)www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-grim-reality-of-gender-reassignment/
timeforsheroes · 14/06/2023 13:21
Resurrecting this thread to say I finally lowered my blood pressure enough to email Therapy Today about this absolute shitshow article. Not that they'll take any notice, but I can't not point out to them that some of us can still see the Emperor is stark bollock naked. Copied below in case anyone wants to crib or improve it for their own use.
Dear Therapy Today,
This article is at best, misguided and at worst, dangerous. I genuinely believe that therapists using this article as a source of information may do serious harm to clients. Firstly, the authors' statements are not supported by physical reality. The idea that 'people and their materially-sexed body do not fit into a hitherto binarised male/female man/woman isomorphic categorisation' is put simply, not true. Every human is biologically male or female. Including those with DSDs such as CAIS, used in this article to support the authors position despite the fact that people with DSDs have repeatedly asked that their medical conditions not be conflated with trans identities.(1)
The authors' assumptions that medical/surgical transition is a) common amongst trans people and b) desirable is again, not supported by the evidence (the authors references consisting of philosophers, self-appointed non medically trained experts and a private GP selling hormones off shore has not escaped my notice either). The vast, vast majority of trans people do not have genital surgery. Only 2.8% have any surgery, including facial feminisation or breast surgery, the numbers having genital surgery is only a small subset of that 2.8% of trans people (2). Contrary to the article, the majority of trans people are not 'waiting for surgical intervention'. The authors also airily dismiss concerns about the safety of the medications some trans people use thus: 'all of these 'harmful' characterisations stem from the...'cis' account of what 'healthy' looks like'. I don't think increased rates of osteoporosis, blood clots, infertility and heart attacks, all documented risks of cross sex hormones, are anyone's definition of healthy, and it is at best reckless to suggest that the problem lies in harmful characterisations, rather than known harmful outcomes of these drugs (3). For those who do have genital surgery, these can have serious complications, including incontinence (up to ¼ of patients in one study), inability to orgasm (up to 30%), fistulas, stenosis and even death, and many require multiple surgeries (4)
The authors also dismiss the experience of detransitioners, and cite low detransition rates using references from the aforementioned off shore GP selling hormones and EPATH, self described experts in trans care with a vested interest in encouraging transition. If therapists were to hear accounts from detransitioners, such as Ritchie Herron (5) or Scott Newgent (6), they would hear about both the huge lifelong illness burden caused by medical and surgical transition, and the failure of therapists to address their fears and uncertainties before surgery; similarly a study of detransitioners showed that 55% felt they were not properly evaluated by a doctor or mental health professional (7).
Far from destroying myths around trans care, this article is perpetuating them. Human bodies are not mix and match, or lego to be rearranged; 'affirming' medical and surgical interventions are serious, potentially dangerous and lifechanging, and we as therapists should not be opining on these to our clients, as this is outside our expertise and role. Ethical practice requires us to work within our knowledge and competence, and BACP should not be encouraging therapists to believe that it is good practice to 'affirm' interventions outside of our expertise. Therapy could have a huge role to play in supporting and valuing both trans and detrans people, but this article does nothing to inform or educate therapists on how to do that; it is purely a political statement, and one which could have serious detriment both to therapists and clients if held as good practice.
I realise that you will not be publishing this article, as it doesn't subscribe to your political viewpoint.
(1)differently-normal.com
(2)fairplayforwomen.com/penis/, using stats from GIRES
(3)statsforgender.org/medical-transition ,citing more than 15 separate studies
(4)statsforgender.org/medical-transition , citing 12 separate studies
(5)tullipr.substack.com/p/scrambled-eggs?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
(6)genderdysphoriaalliance.com/post/meet-scott-newgent
(7)www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-grim-reality-of-gender-reassignment/
Britinme · 30/05/2023 17:12
According to someone I know with connections to Metanoia there's more to Esses' story than appears in his account but she said she wasn't allowed to say more than that.
Orangedoll · 01/06/2023 18:33
Has anyone else just received the June issue?
I can’t find adjectives for how it makes me feel reading this one-sided propaganda. There’s no balance or discussion, no empowerment for therapists to trust their instincts, only rules for what we should be doing. Also shaming anyone who isn’t completely on board with it.
I’ve been turning a blind eye to the BACP’s capture, because the whole fucking profession is doing it. But this is a whole new level of ridiculous. I don’t know what to do! I’m stuck being a member or I won’t be able to work ☹️
sorry for incoherent rant, but I can’t believe it and feel so powerless ☹️☹️☹️
MagicSpring · 31/05/2023 13:00
I thought the whole 'trans people will actually die if they don't transition' was the reason put forward to counter the very obvious disadvantages of medical and surgical transition.
Has the argument moved on to 'these are advantages, not disadvantages'?
Or are they possibly lumping together things like 'grow a beard' and 'have vaginal atrophy and pain' under changes to secondary sex characteristics, even though only one of those is desirable even to someone with a strong wish to be seen as a man?
JellySaurus · 30/05/2023 20:01
All of these 'harmful characterisations stem from the 'unnatural' and distinctly 'cis (in other words, not trans) normative account of what healthy looks like.
Thinking about transmen here - which I will, because feminism is for all females, whereas TRAs only ever seem to bother about tw - I wonder whether the writer has any notion of the hideousness that is vaginal atrophy. I know I'm merely a menopausal woman, so no doubt the writer would feel justified in dismissing my ' lived experience', but having experienced it myself, I can assure you that there is nothing healthy about it, regardless of how you chose to characterise vaginal atrophy or my 'normative' account of what healthy looks like. Neither does adolescent osteoporosis feature in my 'normative' account of what healthy looks like.
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
IWillNoLie · 30/05/2023 19:25
I presume the article is written by a psychologist rather than a doctor or anyone with training in medical research?
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.