There's a useful breakdown of the count of template responses in the consultation results document. I've picked out a key question here. It is on page 113.
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/919890/Analysis_of_responses_Gender_Recognition_Act.pdf
Quote
18.1 Question 15 – quantitative analysis
Question 15: Do you think that the operation of the communal accommodation exception in relation to gender reassignment in the Equality Act 2010 will be affected by changing the Gender Recognition Act?
Please give reasons for your answer.
Respondents 102,820 total, 47,260 to this question.
Overall, 46% of consultation respondents provided an answer to this question, with 69.2% of these saying that the operation of the communal accommodation exception would be affected by changing the GRA, and 30.8% saying that it would not.
There was some variation in terms of location, with respondents in Northern Ireland most likely (86.3%) to say that the exception would be affected, compared to 72.7% of respondents in England who said this (see Annex Table B39). On page 168. (note that 17,000 submissions were not identified as UK)
Responses to this question varied significantly depending on the source through which they were submitted. While those responding though official government channels were more or less evenly split (with 50.2% saying the exception would be affected, and
49.8% saying it would not), 100% of those responding via the Fair Play for Women template said that it would be affected, which had a significant impact on the overall pattern of responses. In contrast, most (83.8%) of the Stonewall respondents said that the exception would not be affected, but the low response rate for this question (1.1%) meant that this group did not have a large impact on the overall percentage (see Annex Table B40). As this question was not included in the Level Up form, no responses to this question were received through this route.
There was some variation between individual and organisational responses, with individuals much more likely (69.5%) to suggest that the exception would be affected than those responding on behalf of organisations (33.9%)
Unquote
I am interested in why this question was ignored by Stonewall submitters. Only 440 of them answered it, out of 40,500 Stonewall submissions. Level Up didn't even include it.
I get the impression that the social media campaign which insisted there was no impact on single sex exemptions worked in practice to make them focus on ticking that question (q13, page 98) but ignoring this one, therefore giving it NO consideration at all, and the only conclusion I can draw from that almost half the total respondents actually couldn't care less what women are saying about communal accommodation, not even enough to answer the question.
You get a much truer answer here about the consultation findings because of this, you can see the influence of coached answers on people by comparing it with the question on operation of single sex exemptions.
The data shows quite clearly what women have been saying all along, that there is a complete refusal to even properly consider the impact by Stonewall.
Liz Truss was right to take the view she did. Nearly 60,000 people via Stonewall and LevelUp etc (see non binary recognition question) were simply facilitated to tick a box saying, "yes, free certificates for all with whatever we want on them".
Fascinating.