@morningtoncrescent62
I just read the article posted by ItsAllGoingToBeFine about the former SNP women's officer, now in the Scottish Greens, and their claims about the SNP failing to take seriously their complaints of transphobia.
One of the many problems with the TRA tactics is that it's no longer possible to name and address transphobia. The term has become meaningless. When anyone putting forward an argument for women's rights is accused of bigotry and undermining trans people's rights to exist, we can no longer identify real bigotry and denial of human rights. I've no idea whether the SNP complainant was the target of actual transphobic attack (whether verbal or physical), because the term as used by TRAs has become empty of meaning. These extremists are doing trans people no favours.
I've thought that.
There were some really horrible comments under that swimsuit model linked the other day. Bunch of men asserting how non-gay they were, yes sirree, by being very unpleasant about a really gorgeous trans woman. Same with Damian Burr's vitriol about trans people, using a certain slur and mocking a suicide attempt. That's genuine transphobia. Can well imagine how that would go down if anyone located anything similar from eg Suzanne Moore, no matter how long ago it was.
Saying that humans can't change sex, that sex and gender are different things, and that women need single sex spaces, sport, and representation based on biology isn't transphobic. It's women as a sex class, advocating for ourselves. And if there were no actual conflict, there'd be no rage, either, because it wouldn't matter what we said or did: our provision would remain intact. It's like those people who were sure gay marriage threatened their own - nobody else's marriage has any impact on theirs, so it was a total nonsense. This
is about our provision ,when males are to be allowed access. We are affected, directly, and some women will be harmed by it - severely so. And we have a right to advocate for our own interests when male people seek to co-opt it, given male people's proven extreme abuse and attempted total domination of female people, through history. We do not have to accept that an unproven, and unprovable, thought in a male person's head matters more than biological fact. And that is the demand. All else flows from that demand.
If transphobia now is anyone saying anything that doesn't place all trans people (though let's face it, what they really mean is male trans people: trans women) front and centre in every possible context, at cost to that group's own best interests, then no wonder transphobia is seen everywhere you look. Because other people do actually also exist, with rights and lives and vulnerabilities of their own.
As for anyone denying anyone's existence... I don't deny that the Pope exists. I just don't believe he is the human being closest to God, and that he should determine how I live my life.
The distinction is seemingly lost on some people.