My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

What do you all think about male circumcision?

137 replies

Zippy1111 · 14/02/2013 23:15

Please hear me out instead of dismissing this post as a "whiny MRA post"

To be more specific male circumcision done on baby boys and young boys for non-medical reasons?

I am personally against it for these reasons:

-The foreskin is a part of the body and everyone should have the right to an intact body

-Babies cannot give consent

-The foreskin is full of nerves. Removal means less pleasure from sex/masturbation. The glans of the penis eventually becomes desensitized after rubbing against clothing instead of being kept lubricated by the foreskin.

-Last Nov a baby boy in Manchester bled to death after being circumcised (for medical reasons)

If it is to be done, I believe it is best for the boy to make the decision for himself when he becomes old enough

OP posts:
Report
Zippy1111 · 17/02/2013 21:07

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by Mumsnet for breaking our Talk Guidelines. Replies may also be deleted.

Zippy1111 · 17/02/2013 21:10

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by Mumsnet for breaking our Talk Guidelines. Replies may also be deleted.

SirBoobAlot · 17/02/2013 21:13

I think the men suffering the long term damage, mental and physical, of circumcision would disagree that it is less barbaric.

Report
SirBoobAlot · 17/02/2013 21:15

And what about the women that are too frightened to report a rape because of fear of not being believed / accused of lying?

There are more of those women than there are men who have been wrongly accused.

Both are wrong, but you can't say that men need more rights when that is a fear women live in every day.

Report
FastidiaBlueberry · 17/02/2013 21:26

Oh stop with the bullshit about MRA's, the Southern Law Centre has named them as hate groups and they don't do that lightly.

There's a reason they are recognised for what they are.

Report
FloraFox · 17/02/2013 21:27

I think the millions of men who are highly successful and powerful and quite capable of having sex and reproducing without tearing themselves apart would agree that it is less barbaric.

Zippy those issues are not caused by a matriarchal society and are therefore not equivalent to feminism. Why is it that MRAs can't just campaign for whatever social issues they feel strongly about without jumping all over feminist campaigns or women's issues? It seems like either MRAs want women to do the campaigning for them ("you're a feminist so you must be against [x thing that has fuck all to do with feminism] and you must do something about it") or these things get raised to silence women's campaigns (e.g. rape / false allegations).

Report
runningforthebusinheels · 17/02/2013 21:33

Rape destroys many, many more womens' lives, Zippy, than false accusations of rape ruin mens' lives. Do you have any women in your life? 1 in 4 women statistically will be a victim of serious sexual assault in her lifetime.

In fact, the men in our lives are statistically more likely to be raped by another man, than to be falsely accused of rape.

Funny how we've moved sylphlike on to false accusations of rape, now. Any other subjects you want to cover?

Report
FloraFox · 17/02/2013 21:36

So what do you call someone who is interested in both men and women issues? What about an equalist?

When equality is even remotely on the horizon, these issues will be redundant. Until then, only feminists are equalists because feminists are trying to achieve something that does not currently exist (equality). "Men's issues" are not about equality between the sexes.

Report
VisualiseAHorse · 17/02/2013 21:41

Would you do it to a baby girl?

Report
VisualiseAHorse · 17/02/2013 21:43

Sorry, meant to say...
Would you do it to a baby girl? Would you chop a piece of skin off her genitals for religious resons? I'm guessing no. So why do it to a boy?

Report
FloraFox · 17/02/2013 21:43

Eh? Do what?

Report
HecateWhoopass · 17/02/2013 21:44

Can I just ask - was this ever actually about male circumcision or did I just totally waste my time contributing when the intention was not to actually discuss what was outlined in the OP but to engineer some sort of attack or fight, hence moving on when circumcision didn't do it?

Report
FloraFox · 17/02/2013 21:46

I'll leave that one for the people on this thread who were advocating circumcision ie nobody

Report
HecateWhoopass · 17/02/2013 21:48

I was talking about the intention of the OP.

Report
WorriedTeenMum · 17/02/2013 21:49

I have never understood why it is done for religious purposes. Surely it is an impertinence, a way of saying that God (whichever one) got the human design wrong and left what? A bit of sprue? Like an Airfix model?

If I was a God I would definitely be smiting for implying that I got the build wrong.

Report
WhichIsBest · 17/02/2013 21:50

I am entirely in favour of male circumcision because there is evidence that it reduces rates of cervical cancer in women.



(I really only said that to try to make smoke come out of some MRA fellow's ears somewhere out there. MRAs are sooooo tedious.)

Report
AmandaPayne · 17/02/2013 21:53

Hectate - No, I don't think it was ever actually about male circumcision. Though it doesn't mean your post was wasted. I had no idea that the sort of issues coming up in your family still happened these days. A number of people have said that. So we've learned something which is important about a human rights issue. That's more worthwhile than a lot of posts on MN (my own very much included) Grin

Report
FloraFox · 17/02/2013 21:53

Sorry Hecate that was for VisualiseAHorse not you.

Report
SolidGoldBrass · 17/02/2013 22:05

Zippy: there are organisations campaigning to help the homeless and and indeed cure prostate cancer. Just like there are organisations campaigning to stop vivisection/save the NHS/promote global peace. People support and work for one or more organisations, depending on their particular priorities, but generally people working on (for instance) saving children in the developing world do not expect to be interrupted and told to divert their energies to fundraising for a donkey sanctuary - or vice versa. Feminism is for and about women, so while most if not all feminists would deplore non-medically-necessary male circumcision (as does anyone who isn't a superstitious idiot), feminists are not going to prioritize it as a campaign or a cause.

Report
FastidiaBlueberry · 17/02/2013 22:06


Norty Whichisbest
Report
RowanMumsnet · 17/02/2013 23:21

Hello

I'm afraid we've discovered, rather late in the day, that this OP is a poster who's been banned and re-banned many, many times.

We've deleted most of the OP's posts (other than the first one as then we might as well delete entire thread) but inclined to leave thread standing as a discussion.

Sorry for being slow on the uptake on this one.

Report
runningforthebusinheels · 17/02/2013 23:31

Thanks Rowan.

These pesky MRA types must just love us so much - they can't keep away Grin

Report
FastidiaBlueberry · 17/02/2013 23:50

Imagine my surprise...

He'll be back tomorrow.

Grin

Report
seeker · 17/02/2013 23:51

He's back already, I suspect.....

Report
TheDoctrineOfSciAndNatureClub · 17/02/2013 23:53

Thanks Rowan.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.