she evidently had some feminist beliefs. she would never believe she couldn't do science, or law, because she was a woman. Chemistry was a challenging field for a woman to enter when my sister did in the early 2000s....never mind when she did.
she never believed she was unfit to rule, because she was a woman. She never backed down from being a woman, used it in her rhetoric, played it as a strength - she embraced the 'iron lady' moniquer. no-one called her Reagans 'poodle'!
she showed no interest in womens issues - true - there may well have been political reasons for that (and indeed, doing things like increase child benefit was hardly in line with her general economic thrust) nor did she actively seek to promote women (but this just means she didn't favour positive discrimination)
there is a strong association in the minds of some between socialism and feminism but i don't buy that: a feminist is someone who thinks men and women should enjoy equal chances in life. how you do that ...well there are many ways, and scattered across the political spectrum.
she championed individualism, certainly... there is something feminist about that.
it is when people make generalisations and ignore the individual in front of them, that chauvinism triumphs.
actually Meryl Streeps quote on woman's hour was insightful...'people didn't hate her policies, they hated her. Many of the architects of those policies are still in political life. They are men however, so the hatred she receives...it raises my hackles as a feminist' (or words to that effect)