I do not support (and have never supported) the Iraq & Afghan wars.
However, I do support the armed forces who have been sent there (under orders) to fight.
How many of them joined up thinking "oh, yippee, we might get sent to be killed in a pointless oil-related war" or, at their interview, "well, I'm really hoping to get my legs blown off by a bomb laid by Al-Qaeda".
Governments, rightly or wrongly, will send troops to wars. They will not ask the general public whether they consider that war to be just (see Iraq conflict). Young men & women have no way of being aware when they sign up whether the future war they might be expected to fight in is going to be "pointless" or a "matter of national security". However, once they have signed up, they have no choice about going where they are sent (please correct me if they do in fact have a get out clause). They deserve no less respect because their government were twats and sent them somewhere they should not have.
How do people feel about the soldiers who lost their lives in more "pointless" wars whilst on National Service? National Service being akin to conscription.
I am not for a moment, wanting to undermine or lessen the actions or sacrifices of those conscripted to serve in the WWs. As a mother of 2 teenage boys now, the whole scenario is just too horrific for words. It goes without saying they have my complete respect.
However, what would happen if young people no longer joined the armed forces? The government would not stop getting involved in pointless wars so where would the troops come from? National Service again? Conscription again? I am exceedingly grateful that there are people willing to sign up so that those who do not want to do not have to.
Someone killed whilst performing the duties ordered of them by their government deserves respect & recognition in my world.
To me, the red Poppy is a simple sign of remembrance for lost service personnel. Not something to start a debate about.