My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Guest posts

Guest post: "We need to stop looking for a 'cause' for autism"

256 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 29/10/2015 15:11

When I tell parents that I've been writing about autism for 15 years, it doesn't take long to get to the questions. They lean in close and ask, "It's the vaccines, isn't it?" Or, "It's the pesticides, am I right?" Or, "I heard it's the GM foods?" It, that is, being the mysterious X factor responsible for the dramatic rise in autism diagnoses since the early 1990s.

Fundraising organisations in America routinely refer to this increase as an autism 'tsunami', or even an 'epidemic', as if your child could catch it in the playground. Meanwhile, health officials - wary of making blanket statements about hot-button issues before all the facts are in - cautiously attribute the rise to factors such as broadened diagnostic criteria and greater public awareness. But these bureaucratic phrases are cold comfort to a young mum wondering why her three-year-old insists on lining up his toys in strict queues.

As I peeled back layers of medical history to write NeuroTribes, I found a number of issues at play behind the increase in diagnoses. Among them was the story of a very determined young mother named Lorna Wing, who was a psychiatrist at University College London.

When Lorna's daughter, Susie, was diagnosed in the 1960s, autism was considered to be a very rare condition. There was no concept of a broad autism spectrum that includes both chatty Doctor Who fans and intellectually disabled adults who require assistance in daily living. Instead, autism was widely considered to be a rare form of infantile psychosis caused by 'refrigerator mothers' who were unable to offer their children adequate love and affection.

This tragically misguided theory had a catastrophic effect on families as children were sent away to custodial care facilities that were little more than warehouses for the 'severely subnormal', while many parents like Lorna and her husband John bore unspeakable burdens of guilt, shame, and grief.

When I interviewed Lorna, she told me that she thought the theory that autism was caused by neglectful parenting was "bloody stupid" from the start. She and John were both warm and affectionate people who doted on their daughter, but Susie didn't respond in the ways that a typically developing child would. She never directed her mother's gaze toward an object of mutual interest by pointing, for example. And when Susie had an imaginary tea party, she always sipped her imaginary tea alone.

Lorna wanted to spare other families the anguish of raising an autistic child in a world that offered few forms of support and resources for special education. In the 1970s, Lorna and her assistant Judy Gould undertook an ambitious survey for the Medical Research Council to locate all the children with cognitive disabilities whose families needed assistance in Camberwell, south London. The two researchers found many more children who exhibited the characteristic traits of autism than the prevailing theories would have predicted. They also found that the range of clinical presentations was much broader and more colourful than most clinicians believed. In other words, Judy told me, "these children didn't fit into nice, neat boxes."

Lorna and Judy lobbied their peers to replace the narrow conception of autism - which made it impossible for many of these children to get the help that a diagnosis would make available - with a much broader and more inclusive model that they named the autism spectrum. They also introduced a new diagnostic category, Asperger's syndrome, to make services available to highly verbal teenagers and adults. And the surge of new diagnoses began - just as Lorna and Judy predicted it would.

To them, this was good news; it meant help was more readily available to those who needed it. Unfortunately, people who were ignorant of their work were quick to attribute the rising numbers to the MMR vaccine, pesticides, mercury, wi-fi, and any number of other factors in the modern world.

Lorna knew, however, that people like her daughter have always been part of the human community - hidden behind other psychiatric labels, confined behind the walls of institutions, or struggling to get by with no diagnosis at all. This is not just a theory: in recent years, two major studies (one in the United Kingdom and one in Sweden) confirmed that the prevalence of autism hasn't gone up in recent years. The 'tsunami' of autism diagnoses is actually an epidemic of recognition. We now know that there are a large number of autistic people in our communities - needing help, education, housing, psychological services, reasonable accommodations in the workplace, and ways of making meaningful contributions with the special gifts of their atypical minds.

The problem with seeing people on the spectrum as a historical anomaly - as tragic victims of the toxic modern world - is that society will squander scarce and precious resources on hunting for causes and conspiracies, when what we should be doing is building more support systems for autistic people and their families. The fact that families in the UK still often have to wait years for a diagnosis indicates that the work of changing the world that Lorna and Judy embarked upon in Camberwell 40 years ago has barely begun.

Steve Silberman is the author of NeuroTribes: How to Think Smarter About People Who Think Differently.

OP posts:
Report
Devilishpyjamas · 30/10/2015 23:27

Lol Grin I am in yet another SS battle (& will be for the next 2 years as we're in transition now so I'll need to start again with adults)

Hope you get it sorted. Keep at 'em!

Report
zzzzz · 30/10/2015 23:31

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Devilishpyjamas · 30/10/2015 23:40

I eat so much crap!

Another issue I have with the OP is that without understanding what is going on there is no effective treatment. We've had two failed attempts at an eeg in an attempt to get some info (have to try again). After fifteen & a half years avoiding meds my son now needs them. But they were just dished out randomly on a 'let's see what happens' basis. These were antipsychotics ffs. He then (true to form) had a 'very unusual' reaction to them, & is now addicted to the bloody things which are giving him awful side effects. Three attempts to get him off them have failed & no-one knows what to do. The most recent attempt involved giving fell-a-horse levels of lorazepam & now I'm trying to get him off that as well. It's a total nightmare - and if we knew more about autism would mean that his treatment could be properly targeted without guessing which powerful brain rotting drug might do something.

I read something this week suggesting that with other symptoms he has beta blockers might be our drug of choice. But I still need to get him off the sodding antipsychotics. And have no idea how to do that. The psychiatrist doesn't know either, nor does the paediatrician.

Yes give me more information. Because the mess we're in is what happens when the autism(s) are treated as one thing.

Report
PhilPhilConnors · 30/10/2015 23:44

Broadening the boundaries meant that my ds (and I) got a diagnosis, there's no doubt that we come under the bracket of multiplex.
What worries me is that some children (my own included) regress after some trauma (be it illness, vaccination, certain prescription drugs), yet there is a complete shutdown of communication surrounding this, parents cannot mention it at all without being accused of being anti-vaxxers and nutters.
A teacher at a local SS spoke to me at length after I asked whether our experience with ds was unusual (developed extreme behavioural problems after taking a prescribed drug, which never went away). She told me this was something they see, and have tried to discuss it at an area meeting, but the conversation is always shut down.
Surely there's a need for research to see if it's possible to identify those at risk, but no-one will listen or take it seriously.

Report
Devilishpyjamas · 30/10/2015 23:45

going to pm you Phil in case we're having problems with the same drug.

Report
PhilPhilConnors · 30/10/2015 23:46

Sorry devilish, my post is crap coming after that. Thanks

Report
zzzzz · 30/10/2015 23:46

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

zzzzz · 30/10/2015 23:47

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Devilishpyjamas · 30/10/2015 23:47

And the saddest thing is quite a few medics think those conversations need to be had (or will have them quietly) but they are under enormous pressure to toe the party line....

Report
Devilishpyjamas · 30/10/2015 23:49

Not crap at all!

Report
Sansoora · 31/10/2015 04:59

I thought it was a given that most autism was genetic, either inherited traits or new gene mutations.
So many families can trace traits back through the generations.


Yes, you don't have to see the actual autism.

And quite often Ive found that those who are most in denial about the genetics of it all are parents who are on the spectrum themselves. I used to come across it often on autism forums, people would be saying I dont know where it came from and I'd sit there thinking well you yourself are obviously on the spectrum (albeit unknowingly). In fact my closest friend, her daughter is one of Andrew Wakefields original children, is definitely on the spectrum but she will have it that the vaccine caused her daughters HFA because there has never been autism in the family.

Some parents are very open about being on the spectrum but others aren't. Perhaps its because they don't want to think/know they passed ASD on to their child whilst for others they don't realise they are on the spectrum and cant see the genetics of it all.

My personal opinion that its always genetic, that it can lie sleeping for generations till the right factor comes along and wakes it all up.

Report
Sansoora · 31/10/2015 05:03

Devilish, my son's life also changed beyond recognition once he got into his mid teens and sadly at 24 years of age his life is very different to the one we had planned for him. We do have him at home with us though, I have a team of round the clock carers who help me and mine to look after him. He's 2-1 care at all times with a third person on the premises even if its the gardener and sadly I can no longer have just me and him in the house overnight.

I sincerely hope your boy gets back to his surfing one day very soon. xxxx

Report
Devilishpyjamas · 31/10/2015 05:20

Sansoora - no-one in our family is on the spectrum. I've done all those tests & we all come out as very low. The types of work we're involved in are opposite to spectrummy jobs. I have 22 first cousins all having children on their own - nothing. No autism, no BAP, no mini professors. Just a family history full of autoimmune conditions & immune reactions.

Ds1 fits the definition of a simplex case- diagnosed autistic with brothers who are NT. That's the definition of it. If you then look at one of the links I gave above it's about research looking into the broader autism phenotype (BAP) in families. There's been quite a lot of research on the BAP a multiplex/simplex autism and it's sll pointed in the same direction. It tells you that in families with multiplex autism the BAP is common/stronger in close relatives but is simply not particularly seen in families of simplex autism. There's no denial there - that's pretty robust, repeated research.

And that's why research is so important. I don't want my son assumed to be the same as multiplex autism cases. The genetics of the two types are different. They shouldn't (imo) be treated as the same thing.

Report
Devilishpyjamas · 31/10/2015 05:25

How did you get funding to have people come into the house btw? I've been told that's not possible because he's too dangerous? I think my council are just trying to avoid him getting his own team tbh (which is what he needs, he needs the right people working with him).

Report
Devilishpyjamas · 31/10/2015 05:28

Here look: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22382605/

'Overall the results suggested that BAP traits occur at low rates in simplex families'

Report
Devilishpyjamas · 31/10/2015 05:36

And here's the full text of the paper I linked to earlier: www.researchgate.net/profile/Annette_M_Estes/publication/232765348_The_Broader_Autism_Phenotype_in_Simplex_and_Multiplex_Families/links/0deec52812d65acebc000000.pdf?inViewer=true&pdfJsDownload=true&disableCoverPage=true&origin=publication_detail

I can't cut & paste the conclusions but it's basically multiplex parents & siblings show more autism traits than simplex parents & siblings and this points to different underlying genetics (more de novo mutations in simplex families). Add in epigenetics & it gets even more interesting.

But this to me, is why the research is needed. And why there's a need to unpick & separate out the autisms.

Report
Sansoora · 31/10/2015 05:41

How did you get funding to have people come into the house btw?

Devilish, We live abroad and are entirely self-funding. My husband was an absolute let down in many respects but when it comes to our son - he has worked very hard to build up our business and get him whats going to be life long care.

I'm going to have a look at your link. Thank you Smile

Report
Devilishpyjamas · 31/10/2015 05:53

Ah okay. That makes sense. Unfortunately we are at the mercy of the local authority.

Report
PrincessMarcheline · 31/10/2015 06:37

I agree that there has been a 'tsunami' of recognition, however I am not sure that is a good thing. Growing up, I knew a few people with very severe autism. But I also knew lots of people who were 'odd' or a bit 'different', but that was just part of their make-up and, in some cases, that what made them interesting. These days, they would be labelled 'autistic' or 'AS' or 'on the spectrum'.

We are not allowed to be 'odd' anymore, without putting a label on it, and I think that is very, very sad.

Report
merrymouse · 31/10/2015 07:09

I don't think many people receive a diagnosis if they don't experience difficulties that get in the way of their day to day life, e.g. that prevent them from accessing education without additional support.

If you are shortsighted you get glasses because your eyesight has been assessed and you have a prescription. Why should asd be different? (Except that obviously getting help isn't as simple as getting a pair of glasses).

Report
WowOoo · 31/10/2015 07:24

I like your post Op and I agree.

What I hope we can get with more research is a 'tsunami of acceptance, awareness, tolerance' as well as diagnosis.

I don't think of 'a label' being such a bad thing and no label can cover something so complex anywayPrincessMarcheline, although I know what you mean. It's a starting point for me to learn more.

Report
Sansoora · 31/10/2015 07:33

I didn't realise the author of Neuro-Tribes is the same bloke who did the TED talk.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

DraculasDixieNormas · 31/10/2015 07:40

regression worries me, ds4 was having what they think we're absence seizures that seem to stop around June time. since then he has started talking and his nv communication has come on loads too

Report
Sansoora · 31/10/2015 07:49

Dracula, from a very young age we could see very clearly that any progress my son made was always preceded by a period of regression. And whilst I know people could say Oh its just that he got better after being not very well, it wasn't that, it was huge changes like the one you've mentioned.

Report
cansu · 31/10/2015 07:53

I have two with autism and want to see much more research into the genetics of autism. I see autism ask medical condition that needs to be researched so that screening, diagnosis and treatment can be improved. Seeing it as some kind of quirk in people glosses over the heartbreak of caring 24/7 for severely autistic children and adults who have no chance of an independent life. While we are all speaking our minds, much as I love my children, I would like to see a screening test which allows people to terminate if that is their decision.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.