My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Guest posts

Guest post: "We need to stop looking for a 'cause' for autism"

256 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 29/10/2015 15:11

When I tell parents that I've been writing about autism for 15 years, it doesn't take long to get to the questions. They lean in close and ask, "It's the vaccines, isn't it?" Or, "It's the pesticides, am I right?" Or, "I heard it's the GM foods?" It, that is, being the mysterious X factor responsible for the dramatic rise in autism diagnoses since the early 1990s.

Fundraising organisations in America routinely refer to this increase as an autism 'tsunami', or even an 'epidemic', as if your child could catch it in the playground. Meanwhile, health officials - wary of making blanket statements about hot-button issues before all the facts are in - cautiously attribute the rise to factors such as broadened diagnostic criteria and greater public awareness. But these bureaucratic phrases are cold comfort to a young mum wondering why her three-year-old insists on lining up his toys in strict queues.

As I peeled back layers of medical history to write NeuroTribes, I found a number of issues at play behind the increase in diagnoses. Among them was the story of a very determined young mother named Lorna Wing, who was a psychiatrist at University College London.

When Lorna's daughter, Susie, was diagnosed in the 1960s, autism was considered to be a very rare condition. There was no concept of a broad autism spectrum that includes both chatty Doctor Who fans and intellectually disabled adults who require assistance in daily living. Instead, autism was widely considered to be a rare form of infantile psychosis caused by 'refrigerator mothers' who were unable to offer their children adequate love and affection.

This tragically misguided theory had a catastrophic effect on families as children were sent away to custodial care facilities that were little more than warehouses for the 'severely subnormal', while many parents like Lorna and her husband John bore unspeakable burdens of guilt, shame, and grief.

When I interviewed Lorna, she told me that she thought the theory that autism was caused by neglectful parenting was "bloody stupid" from the start. She and John were both warm and affectionate people who doted on their daughter, but Susie didn't respond in the ways that a typically developing child would. She never directed her mother's gaze toward an object of mutual interest by pointing, for example. And when Susie had an imaginary tea party, she always sipped her imaginary tea alone.

Lorna wanted to spare other families the anguish of raising an autistic child in a world that offered few forms of support and resources for special education. In the 1970s, Lorna and her assistant Judy Gould undertook an ambitious survey for the Medical Research Council to locate all the children with cognitive disabilities whose families needed assistance in Camberwell, south London. The two researchers found many more children who exhibited the characteristic traits of autism than the prevailing theories would have predicted. They also found that the range of clinical presentations was much broader and more colourful than most clinicians believed. In other words, Judy told me, "these children didn't fit into nice, neat boxes."

Lorna and Judy lobbied their peers to replace the narrow conception of autism - which made it impossible for many of these children to get the help that a diagnosis would make available - with a much broader and more inclusive model that they named the autism spectrum. They also introduced a new diagnostic category, Asperger's syndrome, to make services available to highly verbal teenagers and adults. And the surge of new diagnoses began - just as Lorna and Judy predicted it would.

To them, this was good news; it meant help was more readily available to those who needed it. Unfortunately, people who were ignorant of their work were quick to attribute the rising numbers to the MMR vaccine, pesticides, mercury, wi-fi, and any number of other factors in the modern world.

Lorna knew, however, that people like her daughter have always been part of the human community - hidden behind other psychiatric labels, confined behind the walls of institutions, or struggling to get by with no diagnosis at all. This is not just a theory: in recent years, two major studies (one in the United Kingdom and one in Sweden) confirmed that the prevalence of autism hasn't gone up in recent years. The 'tsunami' of autism diagnoses is actually an epidemic of recognition. We now know that there are a large number of autistic people in our communities - needing help, education, housing, psychological services, reasonable accommodations in the workplace, and ways of making meaningful contributions with the special gifts of their atypical minds.

The problem with seeing people on the spectrum as a historical anomaly - as tragic victims of the toxic modern world - is that society will squander scarce and precious resources on hunting for causes and conspiracies, when what we should be doing is building more support systems for autistic people and their families. The fact that families in the UK still often have to wait years for a diagnosis indicates that the work of changing the world that Lorna and Judy embarked upon in Camberwell 40 years ago has barely begun.

Steve Silberman is the author of NeuroTribes: How to Think Smarter About People Who Think Differently.

OP posts:
Report
PhilPhilConnors · 30/10/2015 15:30

Yes, I remember children at school from thirty odd years ago who would probably now be identified as being on the autistic spectrum.

Report
Stopsteiner · 30/10/2015 15:35

Just in case anyone thinks a Steiner school or a Camphill Community (also Steiner) might be a good idea for a child with ASD, here is some info about the Steiner explanation for the cause and the "purpose" of Autism

stopsteinerinstroud.com/2013/12/17/the-purpose-of-autism/

Report
sassolino · 30/10/2015 15:38

I don't "lean in close" to anyone to ask if it's vaccinations or whatever. I don't trust medical specialists. Full stop. They know nothing. Nothing. My older son's 13. In the years since he was diagnosed as having autism, we've met many so called specialists, and by now, I'm wary of meeting more.

Report
itsmeohlord · 30/10/2015 15:56

I agree - Lonny. It will be - on financial grounds

Report
GrouchyKiwi · 30/10/2015 17:01

I think genetics play a major role. My husband's paternal uncle had autism. He couldn't talk and needed care all his life. The family thinks another uncle has undiagnosed Aspergers. My husband has Aspergers and his brother has autism.

More support is vital. My in laws had to fight hard to get their sons the support they needed. Families shouldn't have to do that.

Report
Obs2015 · 30/10/2015 17:18

I'm just not sure. There is practically no research is there? And even if there is it doesn't change that stil most people and professionals still do parental blame/bad parenting.

Report
Sansoora · 30/10/2015 17:29

I strongly believe it's ALL about genetics.

Yes, I agree.

And I would hope that prenatal testing is a reality one day.

Also, this blokes talks as if interviewing Lorna Wing was a biggie, and that he'd been given a scoop. It wasn't, and he hadn't. All of the information mentioned in the opening post has been available online for decades, and its also what she would sit and talk to parents about when she'd finished her part of an assessment and your child had gone upstairs in Elliot House to see Judith Gould.

Report
Sansoora · 30/10/2015 17:30

I'm just not sure. There is practically no research is there? And even if there is it doesn't change that stil most people and professionals still do parental blame/bad parenting.

Not true.

Report
howtorebuild · 30/10/2015 17:55

Genetics must play a part.

Report
PhilPhilConnors · 30/10/2015 17:59

Sansoora, most of the parents I know personally who have gone through the assessment process have been blamed for their child's behaviour, have been told the child has attachment disorder, despite having other dc unaffected, told their child is showing learned behaviour due to poor parenting, or having a single parent, or the child being an only, or being a sibling and not having enough attention, in one case it was blamed on the child growing up in a small village and not being socialised enough (even though they went to nursery then school).
Admittedly all the people I know have high functioning children, which maybe makes a difference, but parent blaming is a massive part of the whole process.

In the book, talking about Lorna Wing was one area discussed, I suppose the synopsis we have here is touching on areas we in the uk are more likely to know, eg. If this guest post spoke at length about Bernie Rimland, unless you've read the book you may not have heard of him, whereas Lorna Wing is someone most parents of a child with ASD will have heard about.

Report
Devilishpyjamas · 30/10/2015 18:05

Heritability isn't as simple as one gene = one condition. Or even several genes=condition. I'm sure my son's very severe autism was inherited as a susceptibility. There is zero autism in the family, but the family tree is full of immune & autoimmune conditions. My son's regression occurred after several immune events. I can guess the sorts of things that happened (& continue to happen) & why the regression occured - and it makes for interesting conversations with doctors & researchers. And the research coming out of America on the immune system & autism is very interesting to us (there's hardly any though- not enough to make the blindest but of difference to money going into care). I would love to know more though as it would be very relevant to siblings & grandchildren. Particularly because I'm sure ds3 shares a lot of the susceptibility (but is NT).

Of course we don't want this to happen again. Of course we want to avoid it? Who wants to be so severely disabled you will never walk down the street alone & will require lifetime 2:1 care? My son certainly doesn't. I would do anything to wind the clock back & start again with the knowledge I have now.

Epigenetics seems to be a factor in autism as well.

Report
Twinklestein · 30/10/2015 18:21

I think there are many people that looking back could be now considered ASD spectrum - Asperger's in particular. But I know no-one that I would look back and think they had full-blown Autism.

I do think there are more autistic children now than there were 30-40 years ago. But I think mild ASD is simply much better recognised.

Report
Lightbulbon · 30/10/2015 19:38

I think it's genetic.

It seems to run in both sides of my family.

Report
BananaThePoet · 30/10/2015 19:40

People used to be more accepting of 'difference' in its milder forms especially in educated and upper middle class or upper class families. They called it 'eccentricity' and 'highly strung' and 'sensitive' or 'set in their ways' and made allowances. Hence the stereotypical absent minded professor character in books. Anyone who has read Enid Blyton will have recognised ADHD and Asperger and other more non-verbal characters who these days would have been diagnosed but in those days are simply seen as quirky characters and rather endearing. There is the girl in the school stories who constantly forgot where her clases were supposed to be held and lost things and was absent minded and yet was a mathematical genius and her best friend who had a similar personality but had a fanatical obsession with horses. George from the Famous Five had an irascible father also absent minded and unable to dress himself properly or even eat on time without a huge amount of input from a beleagured mother and he was a genius scientist working for the Department of Defence. So these personalities have been around for a long time. My own family history has characters like these and other variations on the theme - 'late developers' was another way to describe them. Bright, clever people who never quite seemed to get the hang of being grown-ups and managing to cope with everyday tasks. But there were people around who would do that for them because they were lucky to be born into a situation where that happened.

Report
mikado1 · 30/10/2015 20:13

Devilish, would you share the things you did differently and what the immune events were? My dh has two nephews with ASD and there are autoimmune issues in his family, inc himself.

Report
Devilishpyjamas · 30/10/2015 20:42

Yes, happy to by PM mikado, feel free to drop me a line :)

Report
merrymouse · 30/10/2015 20:47

Why would there be one autism? There isn't one blindness or one deafness.

Report
Devilishpyjamas · 30/10/2015 20:49

It's definitely autisms..... (Which is why I find 'autism is X' comments crazy.)

Report
zzzzz · 30/10/2015 21:07

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

bialystockandbloom · 30/10/2015 21:12

I agree it's not pointless researching causes. I have a "hf" son and realise his autism makes him who he is etc. but I'd take that part away from him if I could, and I think he would too. If identifying causes helps people make future decisions I'd never judge. Until the world provides proper support for those with autism and their families to enable a happy life, and the condition in all its guises is not only accommodated but welcomed, it is not a life many would choose. Feel desperately guilty on behalf of my ds saying that but it's the truth Sad

Also agree though that funding for decent support is a separate issue, and obviously hopelessly inadequate

Fwiw I was never ever told it made to feel that my parenting was in any way to blame during the diagnosis process, and don't know anyone in rl who has either. Seen this on MN often but not in rl.

Report
bialystockandbloom · 30/10/2015 21:15

devilish I'm so sorry to hear your ds can't access surfing anymore. Loved watching those videos you used to post a few years ago, it looked joyful. Really hope he can do it again one day.

Report
bialystockandbloom · 30/10/2015 21:16

^ Assuming I've got the right poster of course! Blush

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

RealHuman · 30/10/2015 21:23

Twinklestein - you didn't see the people with "full-blown autism" because they were locked up, or at least never went out.

Report
PhilPhilConnors · 30/10/2015 21:24

I thought it was a given that most autism was genetic, either inherited traits or new gene mutations.
So many families can trace traits back through the generations.

Report
zzzzz · 30/10/2015 21:27

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.