My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Guest posts

Guest post: "We need to stop looking for a 'cause' for autism"

256 replies

MumsnetGuestPosts · 29/10/2015 15:11

When I tell parents that I've been writing about autism for 15 years, it doesn't take long to get to the questions. They lean in close and ask, "It's the vaccines, isn't it?" Or, "It's the pesticides, am I right?" Or, "I heard it's the GM foods?" It, that is, being the mysterious X factor responsible for the dramatic rise in autism diagnoses since the early 1990s.

Fundraising organisations in America routinely refer to this increase as an autism 'tsunami', or even an 'epidemic', as if your child could catch it in the playground. Meanwhile, health officials - wary of making blanket statements about hot-button issues before all the facts are in - cautiously attribute the rise to factors such as broadened diagnostic criteria and greater public awareness. But these bureaucratic phrases are cold comfort to a young mum wondering why her three-year-old insists on lining up his toys in strict queues.

As I peeled back layers of medical history to write NeuroTribes, I found a number of issues at play behind the increase in diagnoses. Among them was the story of a very determined young mother named Lorna Wing, who was a psychiatrist at University College London.

When Lorna's daughter, Susie, was diagnosed in the 1960s, autism was considered to be a very rare condition. There was no concept of a broad autism spectrum that includes both chatty Doctor Who fans and intellectually disabled adults who require assistance in daily living. Instead, autism was widely considered to be a rare form of infantile psychosis caused by 'refrigerator mothers' who were unable to offer their children adequate love and affection.

This tragically misguided theory had a catastrophic effect on families as children were sent away to custodial care facilities that were little more than warehouses for the 'severely subnormal', while many parents like Lorna and her husband John bore unspeakable burdens of guilt, shame, and grief.

When I interviewed Lorna, she told me that she thought the theory that autism was caused by neglectful parenting was "bloody stupid" from the start. She and John were both warm and affectionate people who doted on their daughter, but Susie didn't respond in the ways that a typically developing child would. She never directed her mother's gaze toward an object of mutual interest by pointing, for example. And when Susie had an imaginary tea party, she always sipped her imaginary tea alone.

Lorna wanted to spare other families the anguish of raising an autistic child in a world that offered few forms of support and resources for special education. In the 1970s, Lorna and her assistant Judy Gould undertook an ambitious survey for the Medical Research Council to locate all the children with cognitive disabilities whose families needed assistance in Camberwell, south London. The two researchers found many more children who exhibited the characteristic traits of autism than the prevailing theories would have predicted. They also found that the range of clinical presentations was much broader and more colourful than most clinicians believed. In other words, Judy told me, "these children didn't fit into nice, neat boxes."

Lorna and Judy lobbied their peers to replace the narrow conception of autism - which made it impossible for many of these children to get the help that a diagnosis would make available - with a much broader and more inclusive model that they named the autism spectrum. They also introduced a new diagnostic category, Asperger's syndrome, to make services available to highly verbal teenagers and adults. And the surge of new diagnoses began - just as Lorna and Judy predicted it would.

To them, this was good news; it meant help was more readily available to those who needed it. Unfortunately, people who were ignorant of their work were quick to attribute the rising numbers to the MMR vaccine, pesticides, mercury, wi-fi, and any number of other factors in the modern world.

Lorna knew, however, that people like her daughter have always been part of the human community - hidden behind other psychiatric labels, confined behind the walls of institutions, or struggling to get by with no diagnosis at all. This is not just a theory: in recent years, two major studies (one in the United Kingdom and one in Sweden) confirmed that the prevalence of autism hasn't gone up in recent years. The 'tsunami' of autism diagnoses is actually an epidemic of recognition. We now know that there are a large number of autistic people in our communities - needing help, education, housing, psychological services, reasonable accommodations in the workplace, and ways of making meaningful contributions with the special gifts of their atypical minds.

The problem with seeing people on the spectrum as a historical anomaly - as tragic victims of the toxic modern world - is that society will squander scarce and precious resources on hunting for causes and conspiracies, when what we should be doing is building more support systems for autistic people and their families. The fact that families in the UK still often have to wait years for a diagnosis indicates that the work of changing the world that Lorna and Judy embarked upon in Camberwell 40 years ago has barely begun.

Steve Silberman is the author of NeuroTribes: How to Think Smarter About People Who Think Differently.

OP posts:
Report
PhilPhilConnors · 30/10/2015 21:32

There was a bbc article earlier this year I think that said it was largely genetic but too difficult to unravel it all as yet.
I'll see if I can find it.

Report
AppleBoat · 30/10/2015 21:39

I agree with Banana My DS is diagnosed as on the Autistic Spectrum.

He is so like my brother it unbelievable. But my brother didn't speak at school...he was sent to boarding school at 11, so I'm guessing he must have spoken there at some point...but I can tell you if my DS had been a selective mute I would have freaked out and had psychologists involved from a very early age. My highly educated mother didn't seem at all concerned though. HmmConfused While my brother is very bright academically, he relies a lot on his wife to handle his life.

My DS had seen 8 psychologists before he was diagnosed aged 13. He now, three years later disputes he is on the spectrum. (He fully agreed to his diagnosis at the time). Personally I think he's on the spectrum. I also think other family members on my side, and DH's side are.

There are uncles of DH who are legendary. In rural Ireland, they turned up to school when they felt like it, hid in a ditch when they didn't fancy it...obviously had very strong fight or flight responses (according to the many now hilarious stories) but went on to have very successful careers. Because they had to get out there and work. If you weren't digging a ditch on a farm you had to come to England to find work or you starved. I recognise a lot of DS in those stories, which obviously weren't funny at the time. Grin

Report
PhilPhilConnors · 30/10/2015 21:40

Here

In ds's case it certainly looks like he has inherited it, as I have ASD, his brother is going down the diagnosis route, my father has definite traits, neices and nephews have strong traits, grandparents (on father's side) had traits.

In Neurotribes I think it points towards it being hereditary, and differences spotted in parents in Autism's infancy, which I think (if I've understood correctly) brought about the refrigerator mother theory.
Even now I believe there is evidence showing that parents of autistic children are more likely to work in STEM areas, areas which people with ASD often excel.

Report
zzzzz · 30/10/2015 21:50

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

zzzzz · 30/10/2015 21:53

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

merrymouse · 30/10/2015 22:42

On the other hand plenty of people who have succeeded in non stem areas have autistic children - off the top of my head famous people include Tina Brown, Kathy Lette, Melanie Sykes, Nick Hornby, Ken Bruce, Carrie and David Grant.

They may all have people with autistic traits in their families or have autistic traits themselves, and obviously autistic people can succeed outside stem subjects - but none of these parents fit the mould of a stereotypical Silicon Valley type.

Report
merrymouse · 30/10/2015 22:47

Btw, not arguing that what I have read about famous people is in any way scientific evidence of anything - just that even if there are loads of maths professors with autistic children, plenty of families don't fit that mould.

Report
zzzzz · 30/10/2015 22:47

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Devilishpyjamas · 30/10/2015 22:52

Multiplex autism is believed to be a case of straight inheritance of traits. Simplex is not. My son has simplex autism.

In terms of numbers my son's sld school had been around for 40 years. If you talk to people who have been involved with it for many years they will tell you the numbers of severe autism cases have increased as well. As one ex parent- long term governor said 'what is happening? There used to be 1 or 2 in the school, now there are classes full of autistic children'. These aren't children who are a bit socially awkward, professor types - it's full on severe autism.

Yes I really hope he can surf again as well. He wants to, I believe. Sad

Report
Devilishpyjamas · 30/10/2015 22:53

Here for example re differences between simplex & multiplex autism(s)
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23117424/

Report
Devilishpyjamas · 30/10/2015 22:57

And here's something on simplex autism & epigenetics. I would hate to see this line of research stopped.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/25629966/

Report
RealHuman · 30/10/2015 22:59

Until the Education (Handicapped Children) Act 1970 children considered ineducable were not entitled to an education.

Report
Devilishpyjamas · 30/10/2015 23:02

True, but the increases seen in my son's school (& that council commissioners etc have discussed with me previously) started in the 90's.

Report
PhilPhilConnors · 30/10/2015 23:08

Devilish, is that due to changes in the diagnostic criteria or something else?

Report
RealHuman · 30/10/2015 23:08

There have been vast changes in the system over the decades. I'm not denying it's possible that autism has increased in prevalence, but it's also got to be possible that the school is taking a different cross-section on the disabled population. It's also possible that changes in healthcare have resulted in more children who would in the past have died before, during, or shortly after birth, or in early childhood, surviving, thanks to improvements in medical technology and changes in attitudes towards providing lifesaving medical care to ALL children regardless of disability.

Report
zzzzz · 30/10/2015 23:09

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

RealHuman · 30/10/2015 23:09

*of the disabled population

Report
Devilishpyjamas · 30/10/2015 23:10

But this is where I think more should be done to identify the different autisms. You can't look retrospectively at raw numbers & draw many conclusions because the definition of autism has changed (& diagnostic practices have changed). And you're tracking different things under one name. It tells you nothing. With better identification of the different autisms you could start to work out whether particular ones are increasing/decreasing/whatever.

Report
RealHuman · 30/10/2015 23:12

That's very true and I agree with you there, Devilish.

Report
Devilishpyjamas · 30/10/2015 23:14

Phil - the long term governor wasn't talking about official dx she was talking about what she saw with her own eyes. The 'type' of child. And the commissioners were talking about cost (people like my son cost councils a fortune. 24 hour 2:1 care is not cheap).

Of course without proper identification of different autisms you can draw bugger all robust conclusions but I thought it was interesting.

Report
zzzzz · 30/10/2015 23:18

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

zzzzz · 30/10/2015 23:20

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Devilishpyjamas · 30/10/2015 23:21

I think it might be an explanation for multiplex autism zzzzzz - but not simplex (our sons)

Are you aware of this website? sfari.org They bring together all the simplex research (well a lot of it). It's far more relevant to those of us with simplex kids than most of the UK research Grin

Report
Devilishpyjamas · 30/10/2015 23:23

Particukarly the research generated from this database sfari.org/resources/autism-cohorts/simons-simplex-collection

Report
zzzzz · 30/10/2015 23:23

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.