your GP is right...minor surgery is funded as 'an extra' , simply put GPs are paid for doing this , above their general funding. Not all GPs are skilled and trained to do it, and I have never seen nurses trained to do this, so quite surprised by posters saying nurses do it. Gps who do undertake minor surgery get paid per procedure...so say I cut out a cyst , i can claim a fee ( used to be about £70 ..not sure now) but that fee covers my time, the kit to do it, the surgery costs...electricity/recpetionists/ nurses to take your stitches out.
years ago we used to cut off anything..any mole, lump , in growing toenail...mostly for cosmetic reasons..then 2 things changed, firstly it became apparent that lots of possibly cancerous moles were being cut of in GP land , then the patients ended up at dermatology having another op to remove more becuase GPs not that skilled and had failed to take enough away etc. and secondly the NHS does not have limitless funds.
so it is now the case that GPs have to record every minor op, should to skills updating regularly ( i go 3 yearly) and send of to the path lab every single thing i chop off..even simple skin tags ( and that of course costs a lot of money to nhs) , i have to audit all my procedures as well and if i have inadvertantly cut of a skin cancer instead of sending it to dermatology i have to undertake a significant event review .
Plus NHS produced guidelines about what they would pay GPs to do...and any minor surgery must be on clinical grounds not cosmetic.
so your gp was absolutely right in what she / he said.
now some GPs will get round this by suggesting spurious clinical reasons..such as ' oh your cyst MIGHT get infected' but they shouldnt and it does not help the rationing of funds .