Me too Hunker. I was never able to establish bf at all. DD had one bottle of ebm about a week in when I finally managed to get about an oz out and she was promptly sick. Anyway, I digress...
Just to prove the point, I am your average ff mother. I know nothing abut formula, only that it's what I have to use if DD isn't to starve. At the hospital they gave her Aptamil. When I got home, I bought Aptamil. When I took her to the clinic in the early days and they asked what I was using, their response was always , 'oh good, that's the best one'.
A bit more time on MN and I have realised why, with regard to the marketing etc. But I wasn't confident about changing it because somewhere inside I really did believe that it was the best one. Why? Because I was given it at the hospital, because it contains 'Immunofortis', because the packaging looks less frivolous than the others and yes, because it's about £3 more expensive. Therefore it has to be better, right?
Fortunately, DD is 6 months next week and her reliance on formula start to lessen, which I am pleased about as I also have issues with her being ff and my own failures in that area.
But what I really wanted to say was, as the ingredients are unintelligible, the use of formula unavoidable for some and energy levels when making these decisions at a low, how the hell are we supposed to tell exactly which is the best. I don't know what the answer is but I feel cheated that my daughter has been fed what has been most marketed, rather than what might have been better for her. And if 'Immunofortis' is the reason that she has had runny poos all her life then I feel awful that I have actively caused her to have diarrhoea.
Sorry, that was more waffly than I wanted but something needs to be done to regulate this.