Yes.
And there are going to be wide variations between state schools, too.
It won't end when children 'go back', either.
Basically, as a rule of thumb, the more economically deprived the cohort, the harder a school is going to find it to balance safety with educational provision.
So much will come down to space, being able to provide on-line learning, being able to afford tech (in school and at home), being able to pay extra staff.
It's not the fault of the schools, the teachers, or the children.
The government hadn't provided the funding to close the gap. Or the acknowledgment that such a gap will exist.
My child's year 12, in a (good) state school. She has friends in the independent sector. The difference is already quite stark.
And I know that independent schools are struggling. The ones who are providing outstanding solutions have been driven to provide that or close. It's that simple.
But two immediate advantages they already have are:
- a cohort who (by definition) are in economically advantaged homes, often with adult support
Those two advantages are huge. State schools have to juggle larger numbers of children and fewer specialist staff - that immediately means fewer teaching hours and/or being taught by non-specialist staff at secondary level.
And they are limited by what provision they can offer - both now and when the children 'go back'.
For example, some independent schools are having half a class in and live-streaming a lesson to children at home, then alternating groups.
But many primaries, and even secondaries, cannot do this in the state sector because they know a significant, if not all, their cohort do not have a personal laptop/phone/computer or supervising adult.
I mean: could your home provide that at primary? At secondary?
So, yes: inequality is going to be made far worse by this. And it will be an issue come exams.
It's not the fault of schools, teachers or children, though.
🤷♀️