My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

Am I being a tightwad or is this taking the piss?

143 replies

thebarefootcarrottop · 09/04/2017 23:35

So one of my closest friends got married a couple of months ago. She said they didn't have a massive budget which I have no problem with, of course! They decided to hire a big house and not get any catering or bar staff. Instead they bought the food and basically got the guests to all pitch in. All fine so far. But the wedding was a 3 day event (Is this a 'thing' now??!) and there was a different themed party on each day (with different themed outfits to have to buy for both me and my DH. Some of which we cobbled together but we did end up spending about £40 on the various bits we needed). The venue was 6 hours drive, so cost quite a lot in petrol there and back. And we were asked to bring our own drink. So for 3 days we spent about another £50 on wine. Then, and this is the bit which made me rather cross, there was a room set aside at the house for me and my DH. At a cost of £150 per night! So £450 for the 3 days! As this wasn't a hotel there was no breakfast included, rather we were required to bring what food we wanted to eat as well! Oh and then we were asked to buy something from their wedding list which was circulated beforehand. I'm usually quite generous but we opted for a cheaper item as it was costing us so much to attend. Basically, the cost of going to this wedding was over £700! I've just found out that hiring the venue cost her and her fiancé nothing! Because, she told another friend of ours, that they recouped the full cost of hiring the house through the money they collected from friends and family for the rooms!!!! In other words, the venue cost x amount and they just divided x by the number of bedrooms (about 15 in total) and charged all the couples who stayed 1/15th of the venue hire!!!!! I get that not everyone can afford the big do and that it can be quite fun getting friends and family to pitch in. I was happy to help with cooking and clearing up. But seriously, I just don't think it's OK to be this self indulgent (3 fecking days of celebrating their union!!!) and charging everyone else for the privilege. Anyway, it has made me really cross but none of our other friends seem to have issue with it so I'm worried I'm being a tightwad by complaining. I won't say anything to my friend as it's done now, and I know I could have declined the invite. But she's one of my oldest friends and when I agreed to take one the rooms at the house, I had no idea how much they were nor that this would be paying for their wedding! I feel really cross about it!

OP posts:
Report
MirandaWest · 10/04/2017 07:42

We got married last summer and I joined some wedding Facebook groups. Am still in them as they have lots of posts that make me go Shock.

It is definitely "am honour" to be invited to someone's wedding and it doesn't matter whether you have chosen to get married on a Tuesday hundreds of miles away from where guests live, if they don't come then you'll know they're not true friends, as anyone who really was would come.
The day is basically all about the bride (maybe a bit about the groom) and the guests seem to be mere inconveniences. It's fine to say that if someone wore white to the wedding that you'd throw them out. And many other weird (to me) things.

Our wedding didn't quite fit in with this Grin

Report
beargrass · 10/04/2017 07:45

Wow. I'm glad all my mates are married if this is now a thing because I'd say no, as a PP said, you cut your cloth and all that.

If it's been and gone, I guess you he to let it be but I don't blame you for being cross about it. I feel cross on your behalf!

Report
Sciurus83 · 10/04/2017 07:46

£150 A NIGHT?! And no food! That's shocking. YADNBU. Check out The Knot boards if you want to find some crazy wedding nonsense...

Report
beargrass · 10/04/2017 07:50

And geekywombat's just sorted my lunchtime reading. ShockShockShock

Report
BasinHaircut · 10/04/2017 07:54

blunt but if the room rates covered the cost of the entire house then the guests were paying for the venue too, not just for the price of a B&B room. And they didn't even get breakfast.

I am pretty much against pushing costs towards your friends and family, and that includes getting married on a weekday.

In an ideal world you get married on a Saturday, in a location where most guests can return home at the end of the night, and you cover the bar costs too.

I don't disagree with wedding gifts though.

Report
saracrewe2 · 10/04/2017 07:57

Basin i don't disagree with wedding gifts either, but would you really even consider a gift list when you are charging people to come to your wedding and they don't even get a drink whilst there?

Report
Shadowboy · 10/04/2017 07:58

Yuck. It's so crass and deceitful. Also since when did people do a three day wedding? One day is enough for me!

Report
podrig · 10/04/2017 08:00

Everything about this makes me grateful for my friends Shock

Report
Fluffycloudland77 · 10/04/2017 08:00

See this is why I dislike wedding invites. We got invited to one last year which Dh accepted before I had chance to check the small print.

It was midweek so they could afford the venue. We all have jobs to go to the next day.
It rained so no BBQ just two baps each of fatty meat. No Buffett. I was starving. I raided the kids sweets table.
The bride made a rude comment to my Dh.

It was basically all about the photos.

Dh under strict instruction not to accept more invites.

Report
aniceglassofchianti · 10/04/2017 08:01

Well I would have not paid it as would not have£700 lieing about to spend. You could have said that, gone to the wedding and the do on the day and then gone home. A close friend would have known that. If £700 was available to you then you must be able to afford it.

Report
BasinHaircut · 10/04/2017 08:03

Oh god no sara there is nothing agreeable about the wedding in the OP!

Report
Gah81 · 10/04/2017 08:07

I've been invited to a few weddings like this. Much as I love my friends, I can think of better things to spend my money on. So it's always been a case of a family do on one of the three days, so I can only really attend for the wedding. Or one time I was saving to buy a (tiny, tiny!) flat so simply told them I couldn't afford to go for several days but would attend for the day itself and that night, before disappearing off the next day.

Report
saracrewe2 · 10/04/2017 08:13

I remember someone (a bride to be) saying something along the lines of the guests respecting the wedding more if there was costs involved, or something along that line Hmm

Report
MrsArthurShappey · 10/04/2017 08:15

Ugh it's all so vulgar isn't it?

Report
Gah81 · 10/04/2017 08:24

DP and I are discussing marriage/weddings and having been to tons of huge, HUGE events in stately homes and castles and abroad and for several days etc. I am leaning towards a nice quiet wedding in a local church, then have a big get together with family, friends, food and drinks. Plus speeches (his and mine - when am I ever going to get a more sympathetic/drunk audience?!) and then we all toddle off home.

I think my mum would be disappointed if I didn't have a big one though :(

Report
user1471558436 · 10/04/2017 08:26

Very grabby and shallow

Report
user1471558436 · 10/04/2017 08:27

OP I would mention it. But in a jokey 'I had to take out a second mortgage to pay for it' way

Report
Fluffycloudland77 · 10/04/2017 08:27

It's not your mums wedding though.

Mil was "disappointed" we didn't invite Dhs cousins who he never sees & doesn't like but 7 years on it doesn't matter.

Report
BasinHaircut · 10/04/2017 08:33

gah a wedding doesn't have to be big and grand to be good. Not to blow my own trumpet but DH and I got married in a registry office at 5pm, then all got on a routemaster bus with some music and fizz, drive to a nice riverside pub and then had a naice buffet and all got tipsy and had a good dance.

People now still tell us that it's the most fun they ever had at a wedding and it was 'a bit different', by which I think they mean simple, relaxed and therefore quite refreshing. No hanging around all day having millions of photos done or a formal sit down meal.

We spent the money on the things that mattered (paid the bar bill, transport for guests and paid a bit more to have it local (London)) not grand venues and big lights that say LOVE on the dance floor etc. Made it a good day for the guests. Because if they have a good time it will be an awesome wedding. Making it expensive and inconvenient for people to attend does not make for a nice wedding IMO.

Report
Icantstopeatinglol · 10/04/2017 08:40

'Honour' my arse! Well not really Grin
Honestly, when I got married I tried my best to save people from spending money. I wanted all my family and friends to celebrate with us and not have to worry about money. I'm sure some people spent more than we hoped but that was through choice as the venue was easily accessible for everyone but some chose to stay overnight. I'd rather people remember our wedding with joy rather than thinking 'fuck me that was expensive!'.
Yadnbu, what they're asking is ridiculous!

Report
Crunchymum · 10/04/2017 08:45

Why did you go? Surely you could see the costs mounting up beforehand?

You are being a little U to be mining about it after the event.

FWIW, I think it's incredibly rude and grabby and selfish.

If you don't have the budget, don't have a big wedding.

Report
Crunchymum · 10/04/2017 08:46

Mining = moaning

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

BasinHaircut · 10/04/2017 09:01

icant I totally agree, I think if you a throwing a wedding you try and absorb as much of the cost as possible.

I had the pleasure of being in the same room as my uncle and cousin when cousin was going on about how they had decided to get married abroad because it worked out 'much cheaper' and uncle tore a strip off of him. He explained that the 'cost' of a wedding is not simply what the bride and groom shell out but if you consider the guests travel, accommodation and other incidentals, possibly losing pay and not to mention using a week's annual leave if it's too far to travel for a weekend, then that is the true cost of a wedding and not to be so bloody selfish as to smugly shove all of that cost onto everyone else and think you have got a good deal.

It was a pure gold moment I tell you.

Report
thebarefootcarrottop · 10/04/2017 09:32

I won't mention it to my friend as it's done now and I don't want to damage our friendship. I realise I could have declined but I was told the room would be about £150. I assumed that meant the total cost (so £50 per night) and it wasn't until a couple of weeks before that she said it was £150 PER NIGHT!!! Too late to book anywhere else to stay and we'd already booked time off work, bought outfits etc. I suppose it's a misunderstanding. I didn't realise she meant per night or I'd never have agreed! And to those who said we must be able to afford it, no, we definitely can't afford £700!!!!
It gets worse actually......I've just had an email from her to say there was some damage to the house (a small broken window, a wine stain on the carpet) and they're not getting their £600 deposit back, so rather than try and find out who did the damage (WTF??!!) they're just asking each couple to chip in a tenner to cover it!!!! OMFG!!!!! Angry Tell me it would be reasonable not to ask your guests to pay for this as well and just swallow it and pay it themselves!! I am actually speechless!

OP posts:
Report
LumelaMme · 10/04/2017 09:34

YANBU.
In my young day, it was church, photos, food, speeches, cake and home.

Thank God the wedding we're going to this summer is along those lines.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.