My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Gaddafi

53 replies

Qaran · 15/01/2015 18:26

An excerpt from Colonel Gaddafi's "The Green Book".

I, personally though it was sensible.
Read it all and tell me what you think!
I would love to hear your opinion! :)
___

PAGE 1



WOMAN

It is an undisputed fact that both man and woman are human beings. It follows, as a selfevident fact, that woman and man are equal as human beings. Discrimination against woman by man is a flagrant act of oppression without justification for woman eats and drinks as man eats and drinks; woman loves and hates as man loves and hates; woman thinks, learns and comprehends as man thinks, learns and comprehends. Woman, like man, needs shelter, clothing, and transportation; woman feels hunger and thirst as man feels hunger and thirst; woman lives and dies as man lives and dies.

But why are there men and women? Human society is composed neither of men alone nor of women alone. It is made up naturally of men and women. Why were not only men created? Why were not only women created? After all, what is the difference between men and women or man and woman? Why was it necessary to create men and women? There must be a natural necessity for the existence of man and woman, rather than man only or woman only. It follows that neither of them is exactly like the other, and the fact that a natural difference exists between men and women is proved by the created existence of men and women. This necessarily means that there is a role for each one of them corresponding to the difference between them. Accordingly, there must be different prevailing conditions for each one in order that they perform their naturally different roles. To comprehend these roles, we must understand the difference in the created nature of man and woman, that is, the natural difference between the two.

Women are females and men are males. According to gynaecologists, women menstruate every month or so, while men, being male, do not menstruate or suffer during the monthly period. A woman, being a female, is naturally subject to monthly bleeding. When a woman does not menstruate, she is pregnant. If she is pregnant, she becomes, due to pregnancy, less active for about a year, which means that all her natural activities are seriously reduced until she delivers her baby. When she delivers her baby or has a miscarriage, she suffers puerperium, a condition attendant on delivery or miscarriage. As man does not get pregnant, he is not liable to the conditions which women, being female, suffer. Afterwards a woman may breast-feed the baby she bore. Breast-feeding continues for about two years. Breastfeeding means that a woman is so inseparable from her baby that her activity is seriously reduced. She becomes directly responsible for another person whom she assists in his or her biological functions; without this assistance that person would die. The man, on the other hand, neither conceives nor breast-feeds. End of gynaecological statement!

All these innate characteristics form differences because of which men and women are not the same. These characteristics in themselves are the realities that define male and female, men and women; they assign to each of them a different role or function in life. This means that men cannot replace women in carrying out these functions. It is worthy of consideration that these biological functions are a heavy burden, causing women great effort and suffering. However, without these functions which women perform, human life would come to an end. It follows that it is a natural function which is neither voluntary nor compulsory. It is an essential function, without which human life would come to a complete halt.

Deliberate interventions against conception form an alternative to human life. In addition to that, there exists partial deliberate intervention against conception, as well as against breast-feeding. All these are links in a chain of actions in contradiction to natural life, which is tantamount to murder. For a woman to kill herself in order not to conceive, deliver and breast-feed is within the realm of deliberate, artificial interventions, in contradiction with the nature of life epitomized by marriage, conception, breast-feeding, and maternity. They differ only in degree.

To dispense with the natural role of woman in maternity - nurseries replacing mothers - is a start in dispensing with the human society and transforming it into a merely biological society with an artificial way of life. To separate children from their mothers and to cram them into nurseries is a process by which they are transformed into something very close to chicks, for nurseries are similar to poultry farms into which chicks are crammed after they are hatched. Nothing else would be as appropriate and suitable to the human being and his dignity as natural motherhood. Children should be raised by their mothers in a family where the true principles of motherhood, fatherhood and comradeship of brothers and sisters prevail, and not in an institution resembling a poultry farm. Even poultry, like the rest of the members of the animal kingdom, need motherhood as a natural phase. Therefore, breeding them on farms similar to nurseries is against their natural growth. Even their meat is artificial rather than natural. Meat from mechanized poultry farms is not tasty and may not be nourishing because the chicks are not naturally bred and are not raised in the protective shade of natural motherhood. The meat of wild birds is more tasty and nourishing because they are naturally fed. As for children who have neither family nor shelter, society is their guardian, and only for them, should society establish nurseries and related institutions. It is better for them to be taken care of by society rather than by individuals who are not their parents.

...to be continued...

OP posts:
Report
BuffytheReasonableFeminist · 15/01/2015 20:04

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LineRunner · 15/01/2015 20:07

I think that 'submissive' is a cultural construct, not a personality trait.

But thanks all the same for asking.

Report
Qaran · 15/01/2015 20:07

Well, some say being masculine or feminine is biological thing. Some say it's social conditioning. I won't claim to know. My guess would be a bit of both.

Either way I'm pretty sure men (or sexist men) took advantage of it, yes.

OP posts:
Report
BuffytheReasonableFeminist · 15/01/2015 20:08

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

EhricLovesTheBhrothers · 15/01/2015 20:09

God what a load of tedious wank

Report
BuffytheReasonableFeminist · 15/01/2015 20:11

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BuffytheReasonableFeminist · 15/01/2015 20:12

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Qaran · 15/01/2015 20:12

Well you're right. Being a woman or feminine have much more disadvantages, yes.

That's what I'm saying..we should be fighting to change this misconception of male or masculinity superiority, rather than encouraging people to change who they are naturally!

IMO the fight should be, simply, this: That everyone is equal, whether feminine or masculine in either sex.

Not that women need to change and become more aggressive, which is fine if you want to, but you should never change yourself for society. At least fight for that not to be the case!

Know what I mean?

OP posts:
Report
BuffytheReasonableFeminist · 15/01/2015 20:14

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Qaran · 15/01/2015 20:17

This board is just so inviting, it's like a pink cloud that embraces your weary body in its warm comfort, just the kindness and care...it's just too much love! I feel like I found Home! :)

OP posts:
Report
BuffytheReasonableFeminist · 15/01/2015 20:20

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Qaran · 15/01/2015 20:20

Well we're looking at it from a personal (selfish) point of view, which is understandable...I am a man, you're a woman. We're talking about sexes.

Gaddafi is in a different situation, his priority would be the well-being of societies future, which is mainly the Children.

Gaddafi is not God, he says some good poits, some aren't. That's why I wanted to discuss it.

If I thought it was al perfect already I wouldn't be here, would i? :)

OP posts:
Report
HouseWhereNobodyLives · 15/01/2015 20:27

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BuffytheReasonableFeminist · 15/01/2015 20:28

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LineRunner · 15/01/2015 20:30

I honestly thought you were a woman, OP.

Report
OmnipotentQueenOfTheUniverse · 15/01/2015 20:30

Won't someone think of the Children?

Report
BuffytheReasonableFeminist · 15/01/2015 20:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LineRunner · 15/01/2015 20:40

And when feminists critique patriarchal structuralism, men invent a post-modern world where that critique is just another worthless EveryParadigm.

Report
BuffytheReasonableFeminist · 15/01/2015 20:44

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BuffytheReasonableFeminist · 15/01/2015 20:46

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

GraysAnalogy · 15/01/2015 20:48

Are you for real.

Also are you allowed to post that much of an excerpt from a book?

Report
LineRunner · 15/01/2015 20:50

I think in this case, more is less.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Amethyst24 · 15/01/2015 22:39

I don't think anyone's said this yet, so I will:

TL, DR.

Report
scallopsrgreat · 15/01/2015 23:15

Imagine my surprise. A man telling women how they should be.

Nowt changes.

Report
GoatsDoRoam · 15/01/2015 23:26

Qaran, I find you strangely endearing.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.