My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Facebook supports rape?

908 replies

MotherPanda · 04/10/2011 13:53

Have we a thread on this yet?

www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/oct/04/facebook-hate-speech-women-rape?newsfeed=true

I am really shocked.

OP posts:
Report
StewieGriffinsMom · 11/10/2011 20:27

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Beachcomber · 11/10/2011 19:29

Thanks for the link Proles - really interesting.

Report
Prolesworth · 11/10/2011 19:18

Cath Elliott has posted a follow-up to her CiF piece on her blog here

This thread is mentioned

Report
TheRhubarb · 10/10/2011 10:08

SDTG posted this that everyone ignored and it is exactly what I meant and exactly what I was saying. But I guess all this has been lost in the, what would you call this? Not a debate but more like a slanging match.

"Well - this is a very long thread, so it may be I have forgotten a post - but as far as I was aware, no-one had said that rapists had noticeable characteristics, ones that people should be able to see, so they should know to steer clear of them. Rhubarb said that there are definable characteristics, but being able do define something doesn't mean you can see it from the outside. I suffer from depression - it is a definable characteristic, but you can't tell by looking at me that I suffer depression.

My impression is that people saw the mentions of definable characteristics, and decided that this meant 'definable and visible and if you didn't see them then being raped is your own fault' - which Rhubarb has said clearly isn't what she meant or what she believes, and then Rhubarb was leapt on for that mistaken belief.

Also, fwiw, I'm not Rhubarb's friend, and I think it is wrong to accuse someone of disbelieving rape victims and being a rape apologist. I know that no-one has used the exact phrase, 'You, Rhubarb, are a rape apologist' - she has read the comments aimed at her, and has read between the lines, in exactly the same way that others have read between the lines of her statements, and decided she believes rapists have visible characteristics that should ring alarm bells for women."

Thank you SDTG. And I'm very very sorry Custy that you came on this thread on my behalf and was attacked for doing so. You told me on the phone that your comment about the Christmas do had been taken out of context and you sounded upset about that. //hugs FWIW Custy would never threaten anyone, it is not in her nature at all. To suggest otherwise is cruel and unfair. She has been involved in the MN Christmas Do for years and welcomes everyone, whoever they are. She is quiet, kind and generous and the least threatening person I know. To accuse her of anything otherwise is despicable.

Report
TheRhubarb · 10/10/2011 10:01

I'm not reading all of these messages, I had to walk away over the weekend. However I do not like my name being associated with a troll. Whatever MrsToon might have said, it is not fair to associate my name with that.

Also just to point out that I have never ever stated or even used the word 'expert' on this thread. SQ asked how I knew about characteristics and I told her that I once studied criminology at University. She mis-read my posts to read that I was studying and that I was a criminologist. I am not. I studied it and we covered criminal motives and criminal characteristics. I did state that my opinion was based on what I had learnt. If that is to be interpreted that I am an expert then that is the fault of the interpreter.

IMHO I do think - and I stand by this - that the argument was over and done with and the thread moved on when all of this was raked up again for one purpose. It is one thing to disagree with someone, but quite another to say that person claimed to be an expert, that the person blames rape victims, that the person dismisses rape experiences that the person doesn't believe rape victims (which is tantamount to saying they are lying) and yes, those comments have now been deleted but I read them as did many other posters.

It's also very very bad form to bring up something that has been apologised for and to carry on discussing it even when the poster has left the thread.

This is not about me being right. I stated time and again that I was happy to agree to disagree. This is about a debate turning into a nasty attack. And I'm not the only one am I? Other Mumsnetters who have dared to disagree have had the same treatment.

I will not stop posting on feminist threads and I will not apologise for having opinions. If any of you make the London meet-up, it will be nice to meet you in person. Smile

Report
SardineQueen · 09/10/2011 12:37

But there's no point getting irate at mrstoon whose sole intention in posting is to get people irate.

Report
SardineQueen · 09/10/2011 12:36

mrstoon how could you possibly know that experiences related on here are exaggerated or are lies?

Only two ways I can think of TBH.

Report
SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 09/10/2011 11:51

I have not agreed with everything said on this thread, but am more than happy (though that is not the right word in the circumstances) to agree that saying: "Nope, ironic you should say that though, you're happy to attack others yet hate being attacked about your exaggerated/partly false story of one of you unfortunate past experiances" - is truly offensive and unacceptable. Mrstoon - you should be ashamed of that.

Report
Uppity · 09/10/2011 11:47

Mrstoon you did mean to upset people.

You sound like one of those arseholes who habitually come over here, post really offensive, triggering stuff, really upset people and then start whingeing about bullying when people call you on it.

D'you want to explain wht you meant by people lying about or exaggerating their experience? Or would you prefer to offer no explanation for that because the only possible reason there could be for it, is in order to upset people.

But by all means wring your hands and start whingeing about how everyone here is a bully becuase they're so disgusted by your disgusting posts.

Report
DontCallMeFrothyDragon · 09/10/2011 11:39

Custardo, I'm just posting to add: I know that this is nothing to do with you or rhubarb. For all our disagreements over the past few days, you wouldn't post something like that

Report
EllaDee · 09/10/2011 11:25

Custardo - no, and I should have included you in my post re. Rhubarb. It's a totally different thing, clearly, and probably best none of us engage.

Report
HoneyMomster · 09/10/2011 11:23

Wouldn't have thought so Custardo, I know I was cross with you last night but I would never think you'd n/c to tell a rape victim they've lied.

Report
Tortington · 09/10/2011 11:21

just want to be clear, this is nothing to do with me.

Report
HoneyMomster · 09/10/2011 11:21

MrsToon try reading what YOU wrote, to start with - master that and you can move on to the more difficult 'Reading Other people's Posts'

Failing that, you can cover your confusion by calling people bullies.

^^again, not bullying. Disagreement, annoyance and rather lacking in patience. Just to be crystal clear.

Report
Prolesworth · 09/10/2011 11:21

You come on here to say that we're bullies and that someone is lying about being raped and then claim you're "not trying to upset anyone"? WTF

Report
AlysWorld · 09/10/2011 11:20

MrsToon, you're not trying to upset anyone? Have you no idea how utterly vile that post was? Foul.

Report
mrstoon · 09/10/2011 11:18

Not trying to upset anyone, just pointing out how you shouldn't bully if you hate it yourself

Report
HoneyMomster · 09/10/2011 11:13

MrsToon knows these things. Hmm

Horrible

Report
Uppity · 09/10/2011 11:10

MrsToon what the fuck are you on?

Who has lied about or exaggerated their "unfortunate experience"?

WTF?

Wow, you really have an axe to grind. You are completely out of order. That post was disgusting.

Report
StewieGriffinsMom · 09/10/2011 11:06

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

EllaDee · 09/10/2011 11:06

Shock

That is completely out of order. How dare you say anyone has lied about their past experiences? How on earth would you know?!

This is very different IMO from what Rhubarb was saying and I just want to make that clear. Rhubarb claimed expertise that, in my opinion, didn't tally with her posts or the information others gave her. She wanted to be right, she was upset because the subject-matter is upsetting and she felt hurt by the way her responses were characterised. I don't think the response she got was unfair or in any way inappropriate, FWIW. But it is totally different from saying someone lied about rape, and I do not want to see her dragged down to that level by someone posting under a namechange with a problem with feminists.

Report
HoneyMomster · 09/10/2011 10:54

MrsToon BLATANT & willful misrepresentation there. You are incorrect.

^^ that's called disagreement, not bullying. Even though I am a feminist. Just so you, and all others, are clear.

Report
mrstoon · 09/10/2011 10:51

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by Mumsnet.

DontCallMeFrothyDragon · 09/10/2011 10:50

N'awwww, so you namechanged just to attack us?

We're honoured

Report
mrstoon · 09/10/2011 10:47

I namechanged, so this isn't my only post

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.