To be brutally honest, I'd say yes, it probably is a bid to manage you out- but as a cost-cutting measure, not as a genuine reflection of your skills. If you are on UPS you are expensive, and I'd imagine the head thinks she can recruit an NQT to teach reception and save thousands. I don't think the public at large realise how deeply school budgets have been slashed under this government; the 'extras' such as TAs for children without without EHCPs, access to school counselling services, school-funded extra curricular activities etc are long gone, and all that's left now is to force out more expensive older teachers.
It's something I've been thinking about myself- I'm an older primary school teacher on UPS. Our current head values the skills that more experienced teachers bring, and I don't think he would deliberately manage somebody out (our class sizes mean that a formal teacher redundancy would be unlikely). However, he plans to retire in the next few years, so I fully expect an attempt to manage me out when a new headteacher arrives and needs to cut costs.
In your shoes, my first step would be to speak to your teaching union- they'll be familiar with this, and will help you phrase your response in the most effective manner.
I don't think it's reasonable to expect you to give up your PPA time to support the incoming teacher, and actually I don't think the HT should be asking you to do this- again, your union can advise.
I would consider composing a written (emailed , so trackable- screenshot and store a copy off the school system) response to the head and chair of governors- run it by your union first though.
I would raise the following points of concern:
- In order to act in the best interests of the school and the children you teach, you feel duty bound to point out that your qualifications, skills and experience best serve the children in Early Years/ Key Stage 1. (What does your contract say BTW? Were you taken on specifically as an EY teacher? If so, this might give you more clout.)
- As previous posters have suggested, you could outline the training you will need in order to support the move to Year 6 teaching.
- With advice from your union about suitable wording, I would say that you need to use your PPA time to support the learning of the children currently in your class, so you do not have time available to coach other colleagues. However, if the head is willing to make additional non-contact time available, you will be able to both coach the incoming reception teacher, and undertake similar coaching with the outgoing year 6 teacher.
- I wouldn't sneak your own resources out, I would be absolutely upfront about the fact you've provided them- you don't want to be accused of theft. You could say that you need to make them aware that many of the resources in early years were provided by you at your own cost, and the head will need to factor in the cost of replacement items when she draws up her budget for the new financial year in March/ April.
As above, I'm afraid there is a strong possibility that she's trying to make life so uncomfortable for the more expensive teachers that they look for new jobs in other schools to stay within their specialism.
If you don't leave, Year 6 is a high-stakes bet for her. Given that the new OFSTED framework looks more deeply at curriculum and less intensely at results, she may be willing to take a potential hit on results for a year in order to put you onto capability procedures,and manage you out that way. (Apologies for being brutal).
Alternatively, she might be thinking of moving you to Year 4 to replace the outgoing teacher so that she can move an NQT into Early Years, betting that you won't want to move to Year 4 either, but presenting Year 6 as the scarier option so that Year 4 seems like a more acceptable compromise.