Skip to main content
Skip to main navigation
Skip to talk navigation

Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Add post

Watch this thread

Save thread

Start a new thread

Unflip thread

Hide thread

My feed

Saved Active Unanswered threads

Getting started FAQ's

Unanswered threads Acronyms Talk guidelines

Hide shortcut buttons

Talk

Unflip

Parenting teenagers has its ups and downs. Get advice from Mumsnetters here.

1 2

Parenting teenagers has its ups and downs. Get advice from Mumsnetters here.

Teenagers

Sons girlfriend staying over?

34 replies

onebusymum · 09/03/2016 19:04

My 16 year old son has asked if his girlfriend who is 17 can stay over. He has stayed at hers.
I dont know if I am old fashioned but I dont feel comfortable with them sharing a bed in my house.
I know that they will have sex wherever, but I juat dont know if I am ready for this next stage of her sleeping over.
What has everyone else done?

OP posts:

Report

Writerwannabe83 · 13/03/2016 14:21

I lived with my mom until I was 20 and I was never allowed a BF stay o/n - even one that I was with for over two years in total. She had no problems with me staying at my boyfriend's houses but she would never, ever have allowed them to stay with me. I would never have dared ask.

When I was 19 my boyfriend of the time (we'd been together about 7 months at this point) was with me in my bedroom as we were watching a film and when my mum came home from work and she was not happy, she came in to my room, and in front of him said that I was not to have boys in my room and then she frogmarched us both downstairs. It was so humiliating!!!

I moved in with my dad when I was almost 21 (they were divorced) and I lived with him for about 6 years and he never had a problem with my boyfriends staying overnight. I sometimes felt a bit awkward about it but he didn't mind at all.

JaneyJaney66 · 13/03/2016 11:43

In answer to Chocolatteaddict1 why do you not consider it 'the norm' to be in a serious relationship at 17? Maybe it's wasn't your experience or your daughters but why scoff at others, we are all different. Read the thread in first relationships and you'll see that it's very 'normal' indeed.

ParochialE9 · 11/03/2016 22:24

Chocolate, your over use of emojis and poor spelling speak volumes - Goodnight.

Chocolatteaddict1 · 11/03/2016 21:59

Didn't know the face now means incredulous. I thought it was a 'grinning' face. Oh well who knew hey?

I did the 'grinning face' as its not the norm for a 17 year old to be in a long term commited relationship.

I sound like some one who can't bare people's different point of view? Not at all, I thought we were having a discussion about lots of different views and reasons. I was actually replying to the poster you feel you need to 'stick' up for - why I don't know as I just thought we were having a 'discussion' about It.

You sound like you get confused.

mumslife · 11/03/2016 21:33

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

ParochialE9 · 11/03/2016 20:03

Why so incredulous that 17 year olds can be in committed relationships Chocolate? I certainly was at 17, my 21 year old is still with same gf he was with at 17. My dd is committed to her bf in that she loves spending time with him and is not interested in being with any other boy - It might not last forever but doesn't make it any less a committed relationship. You sound like someone who can't bear it when others don't agree with your point of view. As Leonard pointed out earlier more people on this thread would be happy with the sleeping together than wouldn't be.

Pinkheart5915 · 11/03/2016 19:12

If he has stayed at his girlfriends house, I don't see why her staying at yours is a problem.
My mum let me have my boyfriend at the time stay over when I was 16, he was allowed to stay in my room.
Thing is I was a sensible girl and Mum and me spoke in great detail all about contraception/ safe sex. But I didn't have sex with said boyfriend anyway.

Have you and your sons dad had a chat about contraception and things?

Chocolatteaddict1 · 11/03/2016 19:08

'Commited long term relasionships' at 17? and if I could have a pound for every time my dd1 (now 21) said "but so and so parents allow it is be a millionaire! there is a thread going about it now actually.

Anyway that's not my point.

I can honestly say that I never felt that dd1 was ever sexually frustrated because she never had her BF stay over. Boys - well I think hormonally they are frustrated all the time. But that's not my problem. They have a life time of sleeping in their lovers beds. What's the rush?

bigTillyMint · 11/03/2016 17:00

DD's bf doesn't stay over - luckily he lives round the corner, so no need (and we have said no to him staying over)

However I am under no illusions about what they get up to in her room. And I am fine with that, I just don't really want him sleeping over because her room is next to ours.

DD and DS often have same-sex mates to sleep over, but I guess I'm not ready for bf/gf sleeping over.

leonardthelemming · 11/03/2016 16:12

Nobody would be that strict with 17-year-olds - going off this thread obviously they do.

Obviously you're right - I make it three who would say no compared with seven who would say yes, with a further three on the fence. (But I might have miscounted.)

But I think we can infer from the young woman's comment that in her experience as a teenager, her own parents and those of her friends were all OK with it.

I do think you make a good point about maintaining a safe haven, and abusive relationships are, sadly, not uncommon. Not all relationships are like that, however, and - as another PP pointed out - at that age many young people are in a committed, long-term relationship where they treat each other with respect. Sex is just a part of that, and quite possibly a less important part than the actual sleeping together. Why frustrate that?

Chocolatteaddict1 · 11/03/2016 15:12

Nobody would be that strict with 17-year-olds - going off this thread obviously they do.

like I said unthread my main reason is to create and maintain a safe place for my daughter. My best friend at 16 had an sbusive BF and he would often stay at her house to keep an eye on her, she literatly had no excuse if she needed a break from him.

I had a baby at 16 so sex was never taboo in this house as I never wanted dd1 to do the same.

ConkersDontScareSpiders · 11/03/2016 15:02

I would say yes. If they are allowed to stay over at the girls house then you know the girls parents are ok with it.And you pretty much know they are having sex-I fall into the camp that it's safer to have them under your roof than messing about in woods and cars and what not.
Also your being open about it will encourage them to be able to talk to you should they need to.Saying no and disapproving of them doing something you know they are doing anyway would just seem to put a wedge between you and them. It would surely make the necessary conversations about being safe and respecting yourself and your sexual partners much more difficult if you were coming from a place of disapproval.I know it's hard to thing of your dc's as sexual beings but that's what they start to be at that age and you may as well get used to it tbh.
My mum was draconian about this.as a result I never talked to her about any of it, either sex or relationships.Ended up having to take myself to the hospital for a termination when it all went awry-could so have done with some understanding and support but didn't feel she would do anything other than go ballistic (which I was correct about as that's what she did when she did find out!)

leonardthelemming · 11/03/2016 14:30

leonard would you have been so casual about if it was your 16 year old dd? Then not batting an eye the next month when she had a new BF and so on?

Hmmm... Hard to say, as I have two sons and no daughters. But I did spend my whole working life with teenage girls and, although I never discussed this sort of thing with any of them while they were still at school, I did receive an interesting comment from a 20-year-old former student of mine, when she was proof-reading a book I wrote. I had invented some strict parents who wouldn't allow exactly this. (Boy, 17; girl, 16.) Her comment:

"Nobody would be that strict with 17-year-olds."

I changed it to grandparents...

PatMullins · 10/03/2016 15:18

My mum was in the "not under my roof" camp. I ended up doing it anyway just elsewhere.

heron98 · 10/03/2016 15:09

I don't see the issue.

They are both above the age of consent and growing up.

rogueantimatter · 10/03/2016 14:29

Does she live within easy travelling distance of you? I let my 17 YO DD and her 17YO BF stay over as I didn't have any objections in principle and they lived in different towns. I'm not sure if I would have allowed at an early stage of their relationship if the homes were closer. Not during the week either.

I tried to discourage him spending the whole weekend at ours to preserve family time. I'd offer a lift back to his on sundays as soon as he'd got breakfast.

At your DS and his GF's age I wouldn't assume the relationship will be short-lived. At that age relationships usually seem to last more than a year. By which time they're often leaving to uni. So a 'stream' of gf's doesn't seem likely IMO.

If you don't allow her to stay over at yours is your DS likely to spend more and more time at her house?

ParochialE9 · 10/03/2016 13:59

I had a long term boyfriend between ages 17 and 19 and my parents wouldn't allow him to stay over, I don't think i would have dreamed of even asking! We used to wait for them to go to bed and then have sex on the dining room floor!

ParochialE9 · 10/03/2016 13:50

Your house so it's your rules but personally I have no problem with DDs boyfriend staying over - they're both 17. Sex is normal and natural and they are well over the age of consent. DH also fine with it, (we also have DSs 21 and 19 and husbands attitude has been exactly the same with all 3). DD does always check it's ok for bf to stay on each occasion. She can't stay at his though as his grandma lives with his family at the moment and his mum says she would hit the roof - she is in her 80s though! Oh and I've never overheard any noisy teenage sex, that's far more likely to happen when you've popped out to Sainsburys during the day and they've got the house to themselves!

onebusymum · 10/03/2016 12:01

Ive Said no for now, as ive only really met her to talk to properly once, as ds usually whisks her away upstairs. Said once I get to know her better then she can stay

OP posts:

Wardrobedoors · 10/03/2016 08:21

I can see both sides of the argument on this. My first reaction is definitely no, dd's bf is not staying over in her bed as I'm not comfortable with it but then I'm asking myself is that a valid reason, just because I don't like it?
It would never have been allowed when I was that age but things are so different now. For now I am saying no but I'm thinking about it.

possum18 · 09/03/2016 23:49

My sister and I were never allowed boyfriends to stay over at our family home as a mark of respect to my parents. It was never an issue and we never had any problems with it, boyfriends would stay until whatever time we wanted anyway just not sleep over.
My dad was a little old school but we respected him.
I guess from a parental point of view it's worth asking yourself what they could possibly do asleep that's worse than what they are doing to each other whilst awake?

squeak10 · 09/03/2016 23:41

Mmm, difficult one. My ds has a few girl's stay over, he knows the rules, him or her in spare room etc. However, they have on occasion fell asleep in the same bed watching a movie. I feel responsible for the girl as her parents have trusted me to look after her and no way would I, my dh or ds (really) let them down.

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Email address

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Peaceandl0ve · 09/03/2016 21:52

Many of us, well me at least, were brought up to think of sex a secret and somehow wrong. However, it is normal and should be enjoyed, they are nearly adults,bas long as they take precautions, there is no great age difference it could be worse. I am in the same position as the OP but i am the mother of the 17 year old girl sex is not taboo in ourvhouse and this relationship is her first sexual one, the boy is sweet enough and i am sure it wont last but but is all quite natural.

Runner05 · 09/03/2016 21:50

As long as it's an established relationship (not just a couple of weeks) then I would allow it.

They're teenagers, they're full of hormones and they will get up to stuff with or without your consent.

My view is that if they are going to get up to stuff I'd rather it was in a safe environment and on DCs turf. Plus, i feel it encourages DCs to be open about their relationships and feel more comfortable speaking to their parents if anything in their relationship is going wrong because they haven't been thought to hide it from them or sneak around.

Chocolatteaddict1 · 09/03/2016 21:25

leonard would you have been so casual about if it was your 16 year old dd? Then not batting an eye the next month when she had a new BF and so on?

I'd be intrested to see if fathers feel differently to their sons having sex at this age in their homes thsn they would if it was their daughters.

I can honestly say it would be a cold day in hell when Dh would let a young man creep about in to dds bedroom

Unflip

1 2

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.