You lot have been chatty! I don't want pjs, just a flannel shirt/top now that it's chilly. Everything I've seen is piddly thin and horrible, the men's section offered even less (bottoms only) and it was all insanely priced or falling apart in your hands. Argh, will have a look at the cyber jammies, Arket, and check if J Crew on Zalando has some flannel in.
Proper, whilst it is likely that most clothes will have been 'dirtied' somewhere in the supply chain, in stores like Primark, where the USP is selling at cut-throat prices across the board, it goes from a maybe, to highly probable in many facets for me. Retailers that only compete on price can only achieve that by aggressively exerting pressure to get those cheapest prices, that affects far too many who already have so little. Very few can actually compete in those leagues.
I think it's also part of mentality wrt value. I know many will say, possibly again, this year I'll focus on quality instead, and then sort of falter somewhere along the way as the focus is far too much on buying certain fabrics (natural usually, but harder to find at a price point they're used to) and quite safe 'classic' pieces but that doesn't quite satisfy like a cheap high in a fast fashion emporium. However temporary, it's there and incentivises to repeat it, again and again, to experience it once more. For me, it doesn't sit right that something so temporary, that's psychologically used to manipulate further sales comes solely at the profit of corporations, not their workers and not their customers. To me it's a fallacy to think a contemplated wardrobe only comes from buying higher quality items in natural fabrics. The thinking should be, I'm going to be paying the true prices of garments from now on, which is a much harder pill to swallow. In the general that's at least 4x more than what most will be paying now, or buying in the secondary market (2nd hand/outlets). When the price is that high you automatically become more selective, you simply can't afford not to be.
Sory, ILoveMrDarcy, but that outfit to me reads quintessentially English. Nothing wrong with that of course but you asked whether it looked French, a Parisian version would be a much more lightweight fabric worn looser and belted. The shoes are neither this nor that, too low to be a pump and too high to be a flat and a bit too wide and not really covering up but showing too little at the same time (the French have a bit of a thing about toe cleavage). The fit of the trouser would be much sharper and the Breton a thicker material. To me, this outfit is more an interpretation (with certain compromises) rather than the original.
Flo, you've reminded me that my mother had the most amazing Japanese builder's trousers, we searched high and low for them all over Japan with clumsy translations on where to source them. I've attached a pic of a similar pair (hers were a beautiful deep indigo) but they sat differently on her, higher on the waist and a little less puffy. You could also play with the narrow bits at the ankle, lowering them for more or less volume and they easily tucked into boots.
Elle, as I thought then. I think it's less about having mass to ground you but that you need a certain visual line to balance you out. Pistols, once worn in, sit quite a lot lower, to me, they're now the perfect height for my length but I'm a good few inches shorter so for you I can imagine it no longer makes sense and is more like an overgrown shoe. You could have a look at a midi boot, your lower limbs are slim enough to support what is less of a flattering cut to most. These from Z&V may work. I do like the Joe boots on there for you as well, but it's probably pushing it for work. (Pic 2 are just to illustrate the mid-calf boot and how it looks on as opposed to an ankle boot, unfortunately, those are no longer available from Isabel Marant). You could do the less fitted (so they're essentially straight in the shaft) OTK in leather, OTK styles are surprisingly good at balancing heavy thighs out but as previously discussed a tad limited. The Isabel Marant wedge sneakers could work, and although it's been very much a fashion shoe this previous summer, the Miu Miu ballet flats. It's delicate but with all the extra hardware and ribbons it has enough body to not disappear on you (which I think would be your challenge with most shoes).
banana, I quite like the COS shirt on you, the Arket I'm not sure about, maybe it's the way you're standing but you've gone from a banana to an apple in that. Ah, the Atoderm is good too, Enid uses it. I also like LRP Lipikar CO and the Eucerin one. You can do either, foofy thing or straight on skin, it foams up a tiny bit. Love the hat, was trying one on myself today from Helene Berman (pic 3), though in black, this colour isn't as nice in RL. Despite the pompoms not Pampas Princess one me at all. Also came across a lovely tartan Johnstons of Elgin cashmere scarf, was really nice with the black shearling of my coat and as I hoped made it slightly less severe. Unfortunately, it was one of those pidly decorative ones in the men's section so I just need to find a bigger version of it now.
Oversized is one or two sizes bigger, maybe three, cherries. 14 to 24 is far too much I'd think and you have to take into account plus size clothing is generally cut differently. An oversized shape is usually taking an otherwise stiff fit and wearing it in a drapier fashion. When I refer to it, it is more the 'boyfriend fit', which to my ears is a relatively new term, and not the highly conceptual sculptural (the fit remains rigid, just scaled up) semi-cocoon higher echelon of 'thinking fashion'. I only really know COS on the HS to venture into that territory tentatively.
cherries, I gathered some pics, but I'm too tired to post more now. Just wondering where you're at with exposing your body at this size? And yes, humidity matters, and if it requires a lot of travel, really long flights usually equal bloatiness for one or two days so if you're in between sizes best to take the larger in that case.