I just feel so sad reading all these posts. @newlevels, I am 100% behind you on the heartbreaking element. I also cannot comment on what the split is for SF's/ SM's but my own personal experience echo's yours. My ex has found it very hard to accept that my DP plays the part in his DC's lives. But to his absolute credit, he can see that our DC's like him and have accepted him, and as a result (as in your case), he has not once, made the children feel conflicted in anyway about my DP.
@bananas, I don't think 50%/ 50% will be the case for all. But I do absolutely believe that that is where the starting point of conversations should begin. As opposed to the current norm which is one weekend and fortnight and one night midweek. I am a WOHM, with heaps of pressure and demands. If someone turned to me and said 'right you're now divorced and you can see your kids 4 nights out of 14', I would go absolutely ballistic. Why should I be in that position and why should that be 'the norm?'. I'm a parent, just as my EH is. My rights should not and do not supercede his. To have a system that says they should is completely unacceptable. My ex and I have gotten to a 40%/ 60% split and the DC wouldn't have it any other way. As they get older, that may change but I seriously doubt it.
I completely agree with you on the healthy attitudes part; but I don't see this society or the system changing that. Manipulative parents will continue to do what they do if they can get away with it. It will only change when professionals start to understand the problem more and courts start to come down on these parents and recognise the serious harm and impact emotional abuse / controlling behaviours has on children.
The problem you have is if on the surface the primary carer is a good parent. The children appear well on the surface, it is very difficult for anyone to say, actually, we do think the parent with primary custody is not supportive of contact and as a result, either that parent stops doing what they are doing and becomes supportive. Or they risk losing the children. Because, as much as a parent may be emotionally manipulative, no child wants to be taken away from that parent and their main environment. Of course they don't. The manipulation becomes the lesser of two evils and despite every professional knowing what is happening, who in this day and age, has the courage to be the one to stand up and say 'take the children away. cause more havoc to them now, in order to prevent damage from what we cant prove, but think is happening?'. We don't live in a society (yet) where that sort of courage exists. Anywhere.
My DP has had numerous investigations opened against him. All shut down and cleared. Each professional at some point has had a side conversation with him, telling him to keep fighting but to be smart and always have another person present during contact to protect him against further allegations from his EW. I'm simply speechless. Because they can all clearly see what the EW is doing, but seem to be absolutely ok with it and instead the onus is on my DP to always ensure he has another person there for contact to protect himself against a vicious vindictive individual. They appear resigned to the situation, with one person in the court system stating that the judges don't bat an eyelid at the extreme allegations they have to deal with everyday. But putting the children at the center of it, they accept that the children are still better remaining with the primary carer. Because children need that stability if all other boxes are ticked. In all other respects my DP's EW is a model citizen/ parent.
This is a system that has normalised the deeply unhealthy behaviours of some deeply disturbed and vindictive individuals. Until more of these parents lose primary custody and/ or get thrown in jail for deliberately subverting the system, nothing will change.