" It isn’t targeting a particular party or particular MPs - it really does depend on who has done what. "
I wouldn't be so sure of that. Or rather I'd reconsider whether there is anything that links the majority of those whose names have been circulated in the 'sex spreadsheet'. Which is easily findable in full unredacted form.
First some history, the expenses scandal broke in mid 2009 and saw an unprecedented number of MPs decide to spend more time with their possessions / family / second homes / male prostitues who they accidentally fell penis first into.
And why wouldn't they? Being an MP seems to be the surest way to become a millionaire, despite the salary not being sufficient to statistically justify this.
So this left lots of very safe constituencies where the tory vote in particular tended to top 50%.
Hence Cameron's tories parachuted in their preferred candidates to such seats. Few had local ties or knowledge, and if there's anything linking them other than being fast tracked by Tory central office then I can't immediately discern it. Who knows, might be down to the quality of blowjob performed. :)
Said chaps ( mainly) were duly elected despite the wailing and gnashing of teeth from local Tory associations who had the strange idea they should have their own elections and choose their own candidates. Perfidious naive fools. :)
This was the dynamic which resulted in Cameron labelling the local associations the Turnip Taliban. Which is a nice way to get your most active local campaigners to bugger off to Ukip.
Which became a bit of a problem, not per se because of the brain and shoe leather drain; campaigning was changing more towards an online model where money was more important ( supposedly) and Cameron was very good at raising money.
More because the disaffected tories found common cause with both more labour centric people and previously non political types. Ukip grew and started to threaten. Despite the, with hindsight, pretty clear attempts by it's leadership to remain as unelectable as possible, almost stretching credulity to ensure such.
Meanwhile the intake of 2010 was sorted into those who were groomed for greater things, made under secretaries, junior ministers, select committee bods or other positions. Often instantly upon election over the heads of more experienced backbenchers, many of whom had actually been elected by their respective Turnips.
So fast forward to now and the 40 names listed on said spreadsheet, the vast majority of whom are males who were parachuted into safe seats in 2010 with expectations of over 50% tory vote, and a great many of whom have found promotion to be rather easily gained.
Now it could be that there is something fundamentally sleazy about someone from out of town who wins the safe seat, though I doubt it. Or indeed that they're all at it like rabbits and that this is merely targeting a specific group. Which let's be honest we probably wouldn't put past them.
Given the role of the chief whip though, to be the repository of all compromat for influencing and blackmailing use of, doesn't it strike you as strange that in this hour of need the Chief whip, first elected into an out of town safe seat in 2010 and then being made Cameron's secretary is given one of the four great offices of state?
Difficult to be sure as noone is talking but I'd personally say this was the revenge of the Turnips. May's appointment of our Gavin to be the restatement of the status quo.
Hence expect plenty more to come out.