As much as he feels he's justified in suing both organisations, I abhor his decision to do so. Does he need the money? What purpose does it serve to extract funds from either organisation given they are both public bodies? To prevent them from naming other well known figures in similar circumstances in future? Given the flip side of Cliff Richard/Paul Gambacini/Nigel Evans is Stuart Hall/Max Clifford/Rolf Harris, with many more now dead who escaped that scrutiny through no doubt threatening the very action CR is currently taking, I think it's pretty appalling that he's taking this route now. He's flexing that very power that those who are guilty of such offences use as such a powerful weapon in silencing victims/the justice system/media etc.
Had he decided to campaign for whatever law changes he deemed necessary to protect all those future well known people from the public scrutiny he's endured, I could see the point (even if I disagree with it). But a millionaire suing both organisations for millions? 