In 1997 the Conservative government handed over to Labour and a Ed Balls advised Gordon Brown Chancellor, an economy they would have a balanced annual budget within a few years – and when Stamp Tax was applicable, a flat 1% rate, which then began to rise to 3% to 4% for a medium sized family home depending where you lived.
The Conservatives also handed over Council Taxes to Labour around 110% LOWER across the bands, than when the Conservative coalition came back to power in 2010, where once again, those in more expensive homes, or/and with families, were hit the hardest.
The Labour Party, I believe via John Prescott and using the likes of RightMove, was looking to re-rate Council Taxes, where extra taxes would be due on any HOME IMPROVEMENTS e.g. conservatories, better locations, views, anything that gave it extra value to the norm – but this was put on backburners ahead of, if memory serves, the 2005 General Election - and no doubt the 2010 election when looking to limit electoral damage.
So for a Labour Party, with Ed Balls now the Shadow Chancellor, to pretend that they are the party on ‘the squeezed middle’, when under Labour with form there will be MORE taxes on income, MORE National Insurance on income, MORE taxes on savings/home deposits, MORE taxes on buying a home, MORE taxes paid to the Council monthly – is frankly a bad joke, based on there own record in power, and in TIMES OF 1997 to 2007 PLENTY.
So when Mr Balls says to reduce the honking great UK budget deficit THEY left, he will make “different choices” to the Conservative led coalition, similar to 2010 without any new tax detail, you need just to look back to when Balls advised Mr Brown to know that no body is safe, as what may not affect you straight away, does later.
www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/houseprices/11004647/Stamp-duty-millions-more-being-dragged-into-trap.html