My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Whether you're interested in Roman, military, British or art history, join our History forum to discuss your passion with other MNers.

History club

How did people decide what was beautiful (male/female) in the past?

157 replies

LRDtheFeministDragon · 29/01/2014 14:25

Just that, really. I know about medieval standards of beauty a bit, and I know they had a huge thing for blonde women, liked their men bearded, and so on. But I don't know much about the last 500 years or about whether it's different in different bits of Europe. Obviously I guess it must be once you get outside Europe!

But how did people judge what was attractive in a man or a woman?

I know that people must have varied as much as we do but there must also be things we'd think were completely odd to find sexy, but that were attractive back in the day. I know in about 1375 Chaucer has the Wife of Bath say she's attractive because she has a gap in her teeth.

I also wonder how much people genuinely looked very different in the past and now. Of course we are healthier on the whole and I understand we're a bit bigger than women used to be, but I wonder what else has changed.

OP posts:
Report
LRDtheFeministDragon · 29/01/2014 15:03

But ... I don't know if it was. I mean, very pale skin has been attractive at various times in the past and you wouldn't look healthy like that. Nor do you look strong if you're wearing a corset and fainting all the time.

But I guess maybe other signifiers of health became more important in those times.

OP posts:
Report
LRDtheFeministDragon · 29/01/2014 15:04

hester - Grin that is one of his better pictures. IIRC there's a rather pop-eyed version kicking around too.

OP posts:
Report
KatnipEvergreen · 29/01/2014 15:05

But ... I don't know if it was. I mean, very pale skin has been attractive at various times in the past and you wouldn't look healthy like that. Nor do you look strong if you're wearing a corset and fainting all the time.

That's just fashion/status/showing that you belong to a certain class. Men were still fancying rosy cheeked maidens with child-bearing hips though.

Report
LRDtheFeministDragon · 29/01/2014 15:05

I can believe they were, but how do you know?

OP posts:
Report
TunipTheUnconquerable · 29/01/2014 15:07

It's a good point about the gap between the look you're supposed to aspire to and the look men say they fancy. Like the way we're meant to be willowy models with boyish figures but on the whole men don't have a problem with curves.

Report
KatnipEvergreen · 29/01/2014 15:08

Well I don't know for sure. Educated guess with a smattering of historical knowledge. Also to a certain extent, romantic poetry.

Report
LRDtheFeministDragon · 29/01/2014 15:10

YY, that's true tunip. But that's what makes it so hard to reconstruct, IMO, because people use terminology that acknowledges the current fashion, even if they're actually talking about something we'd describe differently. So you say 'curves' but I don't think it would occur to a medieval person to describe that body shape as 'curvy', because they don't have a high-fashion thing for very thin women. (If that makes any sense).

OP posts:
Report
Beeyump · 29/01/2014 15:11
Report
TunipTheUnconquerable · 29/01/2014 15:11

mmm yes, excellent point about language, LRD.

Report
LRDtheFeministDragon · 29/01/2014 15:11

Cross posted - sure, but romantic poetry is partly into fetishing the whole 'beauty of nature' thing, so it would be very different from Elizabethans talking about white skin anyway?

OP posts:
Report
LRDtheFeministDragon · 29/01/2014 15:12

Crikey! bee I've never seen that one. Bloody heck. I am suddenly understanding why Marillia in Green Gables didn't want Anne to make herself look a twit with those sleeves.

Laura still looks about 19 there, though, which I am guessing she wasn't.

OP posts:
Report
crunchyfrog · 29/01/2014 15:25

Do you think fashions last long enough to have an effect on evolution?

ie, would those deemed attractive have more children?

Just wondering if there have been any general trends.

I noticed in Assembly at the kids' school the other day that the vast majority of the kids had the same hair colour as me - dishwater blonde. The true blonde/ true brunette/ red haired kids stick out a mile. I'm sure there was more variety when I was at school.

Report
Beeyump · 29/01/2014 15:26

I'm Sad that Almanzo introduced a moustache, still think he's pretty cute though.

Report
HesterShaw · 29/01/2014 15:26

Nice hat Laura.

Laura says a couple of times in the last book that she is pretty, despite knowing that vanity is a deadly sin and all that. I don't see evidence in the pictures. Her eyes look mad and stare-y

Report
Beeyump · 29/01/2014 15:27

I thought Laura always went on about how much prettier Mary was?

Report
HesterShaw · 29/01/2014 15:28

Yes she did, but wasn't that just because Mary was blonde haired and blue eyed i.e. fitted the ideal?

Have you seen the later photos of the adult Mary?

Report
AngelaDaviesHair · 29/01/2014 15:29

Interesting point, crunchfrog. Go on African-American websites and they will chat away about how male slebs in particular won't marry or have children with dark-skinned partners for fear of their children turning out too dark, often with approval. The stigmatisation of darker skin is alive and viciously kicking. That might well have an effect on the African-American population.

Report
HesterShaw · 29/01/2014 15:29

She's the one sitting down. Granted the photo quality and the fashions aren't remotely flattering.

Report
LRDtheFeministDragon · 29/01/2014 15:30

I dunno, but I'd like to, crunchy. Some fashions last bloody ages - blonde hair is trendy in loads of time periods.

hester - sadly, I slightly agree, from some of those pictures. They make me realize how much I expect people to smile in photos and of course they don't back then.

tunip - thanks! I'm finding the language issue really difficult to get my head around.

OP posts:
Report
LRDtheFeministDragon · 29/01/2014 15:32

Btw, did people see the Guardian article about the skeleton they found that proved blue eyes happened before light skin (not the other way around, which is what people used to think)? The person writing it commented how textbooks tend to picture prehistoric people as if they're white and they probably werent'.

I thought that was interesting though I imagine it's beyond us to work out what prehistoric people thought about it all!

OP posts:
Report
HesterShaw · 29/01/2014 15:35

Was that to let more light in, as people moved northwards?

Apparently there is a mysterious group of people in the Appalachians called Melungeons who have dark skin, almost African dark, and pale eyes. I learned this from Bill Bryson. Anyone know anything about them?

And talking of eyes, apparently Mary Ingalls went blind not because of scarlet fever, but probably as a result of meningitis.

Report
HesterShaw · 29/01/2014 15:39

Looking at Google, they're not that mysterious after all. There are lots of articles about them.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

LRDtheFeministDragon · 29/01/2014 15:39

Do they let more light in? I didn't know that.

It didn't say in the article why they thought it happened.

That's interesting about the group.

I did know about Mary Ingalls. I think she changed quite a few details.

OP posts:
Report
LRDtheFeministDragon · 29/01/2014 15:39
OP posts:
Report
Beeyump · 29/01/2014 15:47

I have seen the later photos of Mary, yes. Supremely unflattering. Apparently Abraham Lincoln was a Melungeon?!

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.