”I have no interest in any argument at all or indeed in any comparison of different med schools. . . I'm perplexed at the aggression which some of these threads engender. People are supposed to be offering advice to the next generation, not competing about whether one school is 'better'”
Quite frankly Molio, I find this terribly disingenuous. All throughout the thread I see nothing but stealth claims by you that Oxbridge is the be all and the end all (to you) and yet you claim you’re not competing whether one school is ‘better’.
Well, listen to this:
”All medics at both universities [Oxbridge] are of an exceptionally high standard”
Which goes to say medics at all other universities are dummies with low standard. May I remind you of the two ‘dummy’ candidates rejected by Birmingham but were quickly snapped up by Oxbridge?
”They [Oxbridge] certainly don't appear to be cavalier in who they accept or don't, and invest a lot of resources in the process”.
This is nothing short of an affront to the rest of the medical schools who would appear to be cavalier in their selection processes and for not investing much resources.
”Oxford and Cambridge have far higher entry standards in terms of raw grades, both use the rigorous BMAT and both have interview sessions which extend for far longer than either KCL and Birmingham, in which both academic ability and suitability for a medical career are scrutinised fully”
The rigorous BMAT? It is strange that almost 90% of all UK medical schools don’t believe in it but opted for the more appropriate UKCAT instead. Surely the UKCAT is a more superior tool to gauge the academic ability and suitability of a potential medic that even traditional BMAT schools like Imperial College and even Oxford are adopting it for their graduate entrants!
I also think it is outrages to accuse some schools to treat some highly able students as ‘cannon fodder’. You have taken on yourself to assume that these schools have deliberately taken on more students on ‘false pretences’ then they could actually cope. There is no evidence whatsoever. As far as I can see, these students failed to reach a certain standard (high) set by the school(s) in their exams and are therefore excluded.
I have no qualms about this. For the future patients, it’s a matter of life and death!
And yet, many more have reached and exceeded the required standard and therefore passed! All exam scripts bear only the candidate’s number and not their name therefore, discounting any discrimination or favouritism on the examiner’s part.
On the contrary, if any school(s) had deliberately taken on more students than they could cope, then it’s Oxbridge. They have had to send students to London in the vital later stages of their training. Effectively, they are trained by London so Oxbridge is not the be all and end all!
By and large, whichever medical school you go to, you’d be learning your skills from the doctors, consultants, specialists and other medical professionals based in the (teaching) hospitals situated at your school. As to how good they are and no matter what others may argue, well, at the end of the day the test of the pudding is in the eating.