I really really wish I could believe that metaldehyde does little harm pigletjohn. Accidentally killing that hedgehog is one of the worst things I have ever done and the fact that it was connected with gardening, which is something I love, is just horrible. I would dearly, dearly like to believe it wasn't my fault!
However, your questions have made me look into this in more detail, and I've learned a lot just on the relatively cursory glance I've given it as a total non-expert who has no business doing such things (I do wish we had a vet to consult!)
One thing I’ve learned is that the conclusions you have to draw on metaldehyde are more complicated than my past position of ‘it’s just lethal’ has been. It’s by no means as bad as the banned pesticide methiocarb, for instance.
The other thing I've noticed is that a lot of people seem focused on toxicology, and a lot of the reports are about the ingestion of large amounts of poison. Obviously, lethal dose matters: none of us want to see wildlife dying. But there may be all kinds of biological effects that are sub-lethal with injestion of metaldehyde, and these seem to be virtually unresearched.
I think the most shocking thing to me is just how little evidence there is out there. It seems that people have fed this chemical to various animals to determine the LD50 (where 50% of them die), but that’s about it. I don't mean to make a point that metaldehyde is safe or that it is dangerous. I mean that there seem to be huge gaps in our knowledge of how it affects different kinds of organism, particularly at sublethal levels.
Things I have found out:
- There seems to be a consensus amongst scientists and the water industry that it definitely does cause water pollution - and it can't easily be removed from our drinking water. Levels in some areas of the country have been reported that way exceed EU recommendations. Concern about this amongst water companies seems to be leading to a lot of cooperative efforts with farmers, yet levels seem to be getting worse not better.
Kay and Grayson 'Using water industry data to assess the metaldehyde pollution problem' Water and Environment Journal, Volume 28, Issue 3, pages 410–417, September 2014
- Once it gets into the water, metaldehyde affects aquatic ecosystems (which are full of molluscs), though different organisms seem to be affected in different ways, and bioaccumulation does not apppear to occur. Fish are affected, though it's not extremely toxic to them - a study of a rice paddy ecosystem found that a proportion of carp, tilapia died on metaldehyde applications to the field.
Moreau et al 'In vivo effects of metaldehyde on Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas: comparing hemocyte parameters in two oyster families' Crop Protection: Environment, Human Health, And Biodiversity, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, June 2015, Volume 22, Issue 11, pp 8003-8009
Calumpang et at 'Environmental Impact of Two Molluscicides: Niclosamide and Metaldehyde in a Rice Paddy Ecosystem', Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. (1995) 55:494--501
- Terrestrial organisms are also affected:
It doesn’t seem to kill earthworms:
Edwards et al ‘The relative toxicity of metaldehyde and iron phosphate-based molluscicides to earthworms’, Crop Protection, Volume 28, Issue 4, April 2009, Pages 289–294
There is evidence that metaldehyde disrupts the physiology of these creatures at a sub-lethal level. One study found significant problems with the spinal cords of rats at higher doses.
Vershuuren et al ‘Long-term toxicity and reproduction studies with metaldehyde in rats’ Toxicology
Volume 4, Issue 1, 1975, Pages 97-115.
Sparks et al ‘Metaldehyde Molluscicide Action in Mice: Distribution, Metabolism, and Possible Relation to GABAergic System’ Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, Volume 55, Issue 3, July 1996, Pages 226–236
- Slug-eating mammals like hedgehogs are less affected. (Maybe I didn’t kill that hedgehog after all!) High doses are believed to be needed for poisoning. However, there are cases where toxicology reports show metaldehyde poisoning. However, a study of mortality in British hedgehogs found 3 animals who were suspected to have died of metaldehyde poisoning:
Keymer et al ‘Zoonoses and other findings in hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus): a survey of mortality and review of the literature.’ Vet Rec. 1991 Mar 16;128(11):245-9.
Birds are also affected
-While herbivorous birds seem to avoid metaldehyde after a certain dose, there is a 'high acute and long-term risk' to grain-feeding birds who eat the granules.
www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/scientific_output/files/main_documents/1856.pdf
Aside from this, a study of the effect of metaldehyde in ducks suggests it can be linked to ‘reductions in the ratios of number hatched to eggs laid, to eggs set, and to live embryos and reduction in the ratio of hatchling survival to eggs set’.
toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search/a?dbs+hsdb:@term+@DOCNO+173
I am sure a real expert/toxicologist would be able to provide far more evidence than I have done here. I think my overall conclusion is: it's not the devil I thought, but I will definitely not be using it any time soon either! For me just personally and based on my very non-expert look at a few articles, Twycross Zoo’s report on metaldehyde seems right to conclude that it’s a lot safer than some other pesticides but that ‘This is not to say that metaldehyde is without negative effects, and every encouragement should be given to domestic users to find alternative, non-chemical means to protect their plants.’
wildpro.twycrosszoo.org/S/00Ref/MiscellaneousContents/D86HedgMolluscicide/D86_3_The_Molluscicides.htm#3.1.1