My son is schooled at home. He was due to sit for his A-level exams in April/May 2020.
He was not registered with an online programme or a resident college. For two years he had been working at his subjects and was ready to sit for his exams until Covid-19 happened.
Now, those students at Colleges and online programmes are to be given deemed results based on essentially coursework for the past two years. Yet, linear exams meant that the only result that matters at A-level is the performance in the exams.
Schooled at home students will, according to Ofqual and the exam bodies, have to write an exam in Autumn 2020 whereas their peers will be awarded deemed results. That means a loss of six months at least relative to their peers.
The Autumn 2020 exam itself might not happen as the NHS might be overrun again with early winter problems plus residual Spring and Summer 2020 Covid-19 infections. This exam also might not take place. A loss of at least another six months.
How are students who are registered for A-level exams, and have been ready to sit for the exams treated differently just because they are schooled at home and not resident or with an online college?
From a public policy perspective this seems unfair. My son could lose up to 18 months relative to his peers for no fault of his own. That he was registered to sit for his exams is indicative that he was ready. How can he be penalised?
I have contacted my MP because this is a matter of public policy. Ofqual and the Exam Bodies are treating students who had been registered for the A-level exams differently.
Could I get an idea of the experiences of other parents in this regard?
Thank you Mumsnet.