My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

Baby names

So, which year's names are least appealing to parents naming in 2013

81 replies

JennyEnglish · 15/05/2013 15:26

Is it names that are 50 years old? Or is it less than that? some people were listing names that they couldn't imagine coming back, like Linda and Janet. I don't really dislike those. Jane is nice. Linda is pretty I think.

I think names I'd be really surprised to hear would be Suzanne and Nicola, Martin, Stephen.

OP posts:
Report
LaVolcan · 16/05/2013 11:58

Linda is pretty I think.

In Spanish that is exactly what it means - pretty, beautiful.

Report
PattieOfurniture · 16/05/2013 12:00

My manager is Barry, he has a son Barry Junior (about 11 y/o), nn Bj Shock

Report
Snowflakepie · 16/05/2013 12:03

I'm sure I read somewhere that popularity seems to skip 2 generations when it comes to naming, in general. So to me, my parents names are desperately old fashioned, 40s and 50s names. My grandparents names are still a bit dated, 1910s and 20s. My great grandparents all have names that wouldn't look out of place on a baby now. In fact I have given my DD middle names to honour that generation.

Works less well with boys as I think there are fewer names and a lot more to me seem timeless, but that's my opinion!

Report
JennyEnglish · 16/05/2013 12:06

I feel like there might be a baby Belinda very soon. I feel it in my bones Grin

Barry Junior!? BJ. Oh dear.

OP posts:
Report
JennyEnglish · 16/05/2013 12:08

I remember sitting in work when I was pregnant and somebody asked me if I'd be naming the baby after his father, I said "no I think that's a really stupid thing to do, so confusing, perhaps after a grandparent, if you liked them, but to have two barrys under the one roof - ridiculous!!" then I realised my boss's son was also called Steven. It's quite common still. I'd never do it. women don't think of it.

OP posts:
Report
bananaramma · 16/05/2013 12:41

A lot of names on this thread are far more interesting than some of the overused cutesy names (Alfie, Archie, Poppy, Molly etc) which may well become less appealing to parents.

Report
boatclub · 16/05/2013 12:48

I reckon Colin is due a revival.

Report
peeriebear · 16/05/2013 13:02

Clive.
My dear late friend Fred was really a Clive; he just didn't like it.
I know of a teenaged Graham Confused

Report
WorkingtoohardMama · 16/05/2013 13:02

I know a 4 year old Barry - I don't really like it though.

Report
Futterby · 04/06/2013 18:11

Archibald. Oh god.

Report
hellokitty123 · 04/06/2013 18:31

Archie, Alfie, Poppy, Molly, Evie and similar overused cutesy names will fall out of favour, I reckon.

Report
hellokitty123 · 04/06/2013 18:32

I too feel that Colin is due a revival soon!

Report
farmersdaughter · 04/06/2013 18:43

I know a 16yr Gloria, it really suits here.

My friend has a 5 yr Brian, doesn't suit him at all.

Report
kerala · 04/06/2013 18:45

Our generation will never go for pam and val

Report
GwendolineMaryLacey · 04/06/2013 18:49

I know a 6 year old Kenny (Kenneth) and there's a Sylvia in dd1's class.

Report
GwendolineMaryLacey · 04/06/2013 18:49

In my antenatal group with dd1 who is now 5, one of the babies was called Ray.

Report
itsonlysubterfuge · 04/06/2013 21:02

I don't mind common names, even though I prefer more unique names. It's names like Fifi Trixibelle and Rainbow Alphabet, that I dislike. Unique names are good, children's names that sound like strippers or paint samples, not so much.

Report
TheBookofRuth · 04/06/2013 21:17

My grandad was a Bernard, you don't meet many (or any) baby Bernards. The only other Bernard I know is a cat.

Report
Startail · 04/06/2013 21:24

For me Steve passes the two generation test as it was my grandfather as well as many of the boys I went to school with.

Meanwhile, Janet, Nicola, Claire, Susan, Wendy, Julie and Joanne are somebody's Mum.

Report
LynetteScavo · 04/06/2013 21:33

I wouldn't ever name my DC;

Nigel, Barry, Colin, Derek, Trevor

Deborah, Paula, Janet, Linda, Doreen.

I imagine those names were popular in the '50's.

I do, however love Kenny, Howard, Arnold, Nancy

Report
MadameJosephine · 04/06/2013 22:11

I love Valerie, I also like Audrey which is probably of the same era.

Names of my parents generation are definitely making a comeback but names of my own generation not so much. I was born in the 70's and am one of the generic Tracy/Michelle/Joanne/Julie/Nicola's of the time. Seems funny that in 20/30 years there might be a new batch

Report
VerySmallSqueak · 04/06/2013 22:19

How about Carol or Adrian?
Christine or Gary?

I think it's names between 40 and 60 years ago that mainly fall in the 'dated' category.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

FeelingHorse · 04/06/2013 22:24

Neil could never make a comeback!

My DP is called Neil, and I've always wondered why someone would look at a tiny cute newborn and go "This baby looks like a Neil...."

Report
AcrylicPlexiglass · 04/06/2013 22:30

I love Suzanne.

I know lots and lots of Kennys of all ages but they are all Nigerian twin Kehindes and not Kenneths!

Report
LazyMonkeyButler · 04/06/2013 22:31

Judging mainly by MN baby name threads, I would guess that "granny names" like Nora, Maude, Mabel etc. are going to continue to rise in popularity and "overused cutesy" names will become, well, less overused - Poppy, Ellie etc.

In real life though, I know of NO actual babies being given old lady names and recent births include Ellie-May, Lilllie-Rose & Sienna-Mae - all of which would be frowned upon in a rather judgey way on MN.

My conclusion is that it's all rather regional.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.