My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

To send this missive to Sainsburys...

108 replies

DonutMum · 17/08/2008 16:29

The content of the note says it all. He gulped so mych air in his screaming that he STILL has wind.

"I am writing to complain about a ludicrous situation I found myself in at your Stanway Colchester store today. I asked the restaurant to fill a container with hot water so my baby's bottle could be heated. My baby, who is 5 weeks old, was screaming. I was told that they could not give me water due to health and safety law (!) and they would heat the bottle for me. Are you seriously expecting customers with children who find themselves in this position to be willing to allow a spotty nineteen year old boy to judge when a baby's milk is warm enough? In the event, the milk was overheated and my son continued to scream for a further ten minutes causing great distress to me and to him. This is totally unacceptable and I suggest you review your policy to allow mothers to have hot water and therefore judge for themselves when milk has been adequately heated. After all, I could have asked for a pot of tea with the tea bag on the side and used that hot water to heat the bottle. I also find it incredulous that health and safety "law" is given as the reason - it is quite clearly policy. Unless, you can point out where on the statute books this particular law is - "thou shalt not allow people to have jugs of hot water in case, in their infinite cretindom, they burn themselves."

Thank you for your consideration."

OP posts:
Report
nappyaddict · 18/08/2008 01:58

In future tell the "spotty 19 year old boy" exactly how long you want it heating up for. Some babies like milk warmer than others. About a year ago I heated up a bottle of milk to a temperature which I thought was ok cos that's how my ds would drink it. Woman moaned to manager saying if we were going to have such a stupid policy could she ensure that she didn't let "some kid who didn't have a clue about babies heat up bottles" had to bite my tongue with that one. So then the next time someone asked me I made it less warm and then got asked if i'd even bothered to put it in any hot water. You can't win. Now I always ask how long they want it heating up for.

Report
sandcastles · 18/08/2008 02:25

I am new to breastfeeding [didn't feed dd1, but am feeding dd2, 5 weeks] and I have a plentyful supply [which includes spraying & leaking profusely if she comes off ], so I try to avoid feeding in public for now. This means timimg things so dd will not need a feed while out or taking EBM [which she has at room temp, so don't have to worry about heating] with me etc.

But saying that, given the choice between waiting for a bottle to cool while watching my dd scream, leading to her becoming THAT distressed or getting my boobs out in public, I know which I would have done.

You really cannot blame Sainbury's for this, the "no hot water/no heating bottle for customers" 'rule' has been floating around for years. I know that many places wouldn't help when dd was ff [she is now 5], which is why I started giving at room temp!

Report
gagamama · 18/08/2008 11:18

I used to work as a waitress at the restaurant of a child-orientated tourist attraction, and we had the same policy. However we did allow mothers to heat the bottle in water, but the bowl of water had to be behind our counter. There was also a microwave for customer use with disclaimers stuck all over it so say that customers were responsible for the heat of the bottles which came out of the microwave and to check the temperature before feeding.

You'd think this was common sense really, but some people will complain about anything. :hmm:

It's people like you who make these kind of laws necessary. YABU!

Report
MsHighwater · 18/08/2008 19:47

"It's people like you who make these kind of laws necessary"

Get a grip, gagamama. The OP complained. She didn't sue. And it's NOT a law, it's an over-zealous interpretation by a company of Health & Safety regulations.

Report
FAQ · 18/08/2008 19:49

what I don't get is that some places will say

"we can't give you water, but we can warm it up for you - healthy and safety"

then others say

"we're not allowed to warm it up, here's some hot water - healthy and safety"

so which is it??? I had both while on holiday recently

Report
MsHighwater · 18/08/2008 20:12

It's like I said, FAQ - an overzealous interpretation of the law arising from an imperfect understanding of it.

When a company cites "Health & Safety", they are not seeking to protect their customers/staff but the company itself. It's just that they often neglect to carry out a sensible risk assessment before formulating policy. I'm not just talking about Sainsbury's here, of course.

Anyone remember conkers being banned? Or hanging baskets?

Report
pinkspottywellies · 18/08/2008 20:24

The ones who say they can't warm it up for you is because if they take it out of your sight they could be accused of tampering/putting something in it. The ones who will take it but not give you a receptacle of hot water is in case you knock it over. (Don't tell the companies this or they won't be able to figure out which policy to use and will just ban babies )

Report
KatieDD · 18/08/2008 22:11

gagamama is absolutely right, back in the day when people could be trusted to heat up their own milk with a bit of hot water without issuing law suits if they tipped the hot water over themselves, then all was fine and dandy.
The babies are left screaming because common sense and personal responsibility has gone out of the window.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.