My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

To expect people not to use the word hung when they mean hanged.

189 replies

cushioncover · 07/09/2007 17:22

Ok, I know IABU, and I'm no grammar queen myself but I've read this 4 times today and I just had to rant about it! There!

OP posts:
Report
Dinosaur · 11/09/2007 11:47

puff

Report
ElsieSnuffins · 11/09/2007 09:05

"at all"

As in, "Would you like a drink at all?"

Meaning what? "Would you even consider having a drink?"

Report
puff · 10/09/2007 23:00

I always say my mother hung herself.

I don't like to think of her executing herself and prefer to think she was dead already iyswim.

Meat is hung.

A man is hanged.

Report
RibenaBerry · 10/09/2007 22:34

My argument was slightly different: it was that bra has become a word in its own right. It's similar to the fact that I only know one person who writes 'phone (as in "Sarah 'phoned"), which of course is a contraction.

Had never thought that about CD's....

Report
StealthPolarBear · 10/09/2007 20:22

I never use an apostrophe for contractions
CD's is very common but surely if it indicates missing letters it should be C'D's?

Report
RibenaBerry · 10/09/2007 18:05

Right, I have a question.

I was looking at an online shop that sold Bra's. My initial thought was, "oh, can't shop here then". However, is that actually correct, given that bra is a contraction of brassiere?

Mind you, I don't think that they were that clever. It said Bras on all the other brand pages!

Report
Dinosaur · 10/09/2007 16:37

Possibly...

Report
frogs · 10/09/2007 16:36

Dino, might there be a tense issue there? "I sentence you to be hung..." but "he was hanged"? No evidence for this btw, just hypothesising. Have looked up shorter OED, but is not conclusive, just cites 'hanged' as archaic form of the pple, wrt execution.

Report
Threadworm · 10/09/2007 14:13

And if lots of clairvoyants set up a single newspaper, would it be a media's medium?

Report
Dinosaur · 10/09/2007 14:11

A very recent change then.

The refs I found were older than that, I think.

Anyway, people with an obsessive interest in judicial murder give me the creeps, so I'm not googling any more!

Report
Ellbell · 10/09/2007 14:10

LOL Threadworm. I believe that the media are to blame.

Report
cushioncover · 10/09/2007 14:08

The extract states that in 1948 the wording changed from, 'suffer death by hanging' to 'be hanged by the neck until dead'.

Sorry, my link doesn't seem to work.

OP posts:
Report
sweetboy · 10/09/2007 14:06

I haven't read the whole thread so I may be repeating a previous post. I would like to add "It doesn't notice..." This is said of an inanimate object such as a spot on your face; instead of "It doesn't really show..." or something similar!

Report
Dinosaur · 10/09/2007 14:04

I found several refs to "hung by the neck".

Report
cushioncover · 10/09/2007 14:04

Oh and I found the reference on a site about capital punishment in the UK.
www.richard.clark32.btinternet.co.uk/hanging1
I'll try and find something more credible.

OP posts:
Report
cushioncover · 10/09/2007 14:00

Oh no I wasn't trying to give you (or anyone else) a grammar lesson there. I was trying to clarify my own rambling (in the previous post) on a point I often have to think about.

Please don't be offended.

OP posts:
Report
Dinosaur · 10/09/2007 13:56

Thanks, but my grammar is rather good, actually .

Report
cushioncover · 10/09/2007 13:50

Lol, yes Dino!
People is its own plural word rather than the singular with an 's' added. Therefore, the possessive of people is people's.

If it was, 'The girls' princess', then the apostrophe comes after the 's' to donate plural. This avoids confusion with the princess that belongs to the girl.

Hope that makes sense.

OP posts:
Report
Dinosaur · 10/09/2007 13:48

And I am still not sure I agree with you!

Find me an authoritative source which demonstrates that judges used to say "I sentence you to be hanged by the neck until you are dead" rather than "hung by the neck"?

Report
Dinosaur · 10/09/2007 13:46

You mean, like the people's princess?

Report
cushioncover · 10/09/2007 13:44

Sorry, Dino. Just seen your question. It is actually, 'hanged by the neck until dead'. Just as it is actually, 'hanged, drawn and quartered'. Years of general conversation have changed them.

Although I have to say, I'm not so much of a stickler that I don't think that language much adapt and change.

Can I just hold my hand up and admit to sometimes getting confused (or forgeting) the rule for the plural possessor. I always have to think about whether it's a regular plural with an 's' or whether the plural requires no 's' therefore the apostrophe should go before the 's'! I think I just keep on top of that one because I have to teach it to Y6s. It's the only use of apostrophe that sometimes confuses me.

OP posts:
Report
MrsBumblebee · 10/09/2007 12:31

PMSL

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Threadworm · 10/09/2007 12:28

I mean ', , and ' of course.

On the singular verb thing, the data are inconclusive.

Report
Ellbell · 10/09/2007 12:27

NB that my last two posts are inconsistent in their emoticon/punctuation usage.

I can't spell 'repentance'. Total mental block about it!

Report
Threadworm · 10/09/2007 12:25

Equivalent!!!! My favourite word to spell wrong. See, skirt tucked in knickers , , .

(Note the use of the serial comma before the final emoticon.)

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.