My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

To think children should not ALWAYS come first

196 replies

FavaBeansAndANiceChianti · 09/10/2019 17:55

And that it's actually quite detrimental to their future personalities to let them think that they should?

I'm not talking inviting a known sex offender to live in your home kind of situation. But I hate seeing this line trotted out when half of the time I actually think it wouldn't do the children involved any harm to not come first in that particular situation.

Sometimes I read things on here and wonder how entitled and selfish these children must grow up to be.

I've seen people getting the pitchforks out because apparently parents should prioritize abroad holidays if their child has become 'accustomed' to them even if they can't afford it or would rather use the money elsewhere one year.

And I can't even start on the step parenting threads, you see it ALL the time on there, often over things which seem more to do with putting the ex first than the children.

I understand generally that children should come first in terms of needs. However, AIBU to think that people take this far too literally sometimes and it really is fine for other people's wants, needs and desires and feelings to be taken into consideration within the family from time to time?

OP posts:
Report
IceCreamAndCandyfloss · 09/10/2019 21:49

I think their needs should always come first and wants should be met if reasonable ie hobbies etc.

I think they should definitely be first before new relationships, I’ve seen too many put a new relationship over a child.

Report
SpagBowl99 · 09/10/2019 22:00

Totally agree with you OP. Children's needs need to be met, but then everyone is on an equal footing.

Have to admit that I am not always practicing this. But I agree we should be.

Report
Longlongsummer · 10/10/2019 00:01

@AnneLovesGilbert if that’s what you felt was good for you then that is great. However many SMs have difficulties and there are problematic, tricky relationships which aren’t just about feeding kids, and it’s totally fine to put these tricky dynamics on hold for a few days. I was made to feel guilty for asking for a few days space from my very tricky and resentful DSD, and so I just gave in and said it was fine. It wasn’t. My first days out of hospital were all about her, she was not nice to my older child, she wanted to have the baby on her own on day three, she wanted her mother to come around, she said breastfeeding was rude and complained to her father constantly. Sometimes I think a parent, even a SM needs to be prioritised even for a short while.

Visiting in hospital is obviously usually totally fine.

Report
Wellthatwasarottennightssleep · 10/10/2019 00:29

Agree that there's a distinction between needs and wants (although it's not always completely clear-cut which is which). I know mothers who brag about the fact that, as a point of principle, they will cancel any adult plans at short notice if their small child tells them to cancel. That seems ridiculous to me. It would be different if the child is ill or uncharacteristically distraught about something; in that case, I'd argue that the child needs to be with a loving, familiar attachment figure until they feel better (although not necessarily the mother). But giving into a tantrum because the child doesn't want to share mummy isn't putting the child's needs first. I'd argue it's the opposite, because children need to learn how to function in society and that their wants can't always come first.

Report
Longlongsummer · 10/10/2019 00:45

In my experience it is also often when people separate that ‘children must come first’ is bought acutely into the picture. It is often to serve adults needs, rather than the child’s, for example:

  • a parent over intensely identifying with their child and putting their own anxieties onto them
  • indulging a child to ensure their love is still intact after separation
  • Covering their own perceived inadequacy as a parent by repeating this e.g. my DD must have her own preferred holiday above many adult decisions because I do not parent her as much as I did before and feel guilty.

Etc...

It also can teach children that they can manipulate their parents as their wants trump anyone else’s.

However on the other side it is absolutely awful to see children’s needs ignored for adult priorities, such as a parent not being interested in their schooling, their emotional and physical health. The parent ultimately must sacrifice their selfish wants for their kids needs, or step kids.
Report
Wellthatwasarottennightssleep · 10/10/2019 00:47

Oh, and my mother has always bragged about being a superior mother because she didn't pursue a new relationship until her kids were adults. Then, after I'd left home, she met a guy online and moved him in when she'd met him less than half a dozen times. He sexually harassed me and made inappropriate comments every time I was visiting, so I ended up feeling uncomfortable in my mother's house and not really visiting anymore unless I had to. At the end of the day, it's her life and her home, of course. But I think our relationship would be much better now if she had introduced a carefully vetted new partner at a gradual pace when I was a child. Instead, she martyred herself to "I will never bring a man into the house while my kids live there", then panicked because she (wrongly) thought she was on the shelf.

Report
ArizonaRobbins · 10/10/2019 01:21

Well personally I don’t think “blended families” are ever about putting the children first.

Christ. Can you imagine having to live with unrelated strangers without any say in the matter? I wouldn’t ever put my girls through that. It is always about the adults’ needs before the children.

Report
Oliversmumsarmy · 10/10/2019 02:02

I certainly wasn’t put first ever when I was growing up.

My mother didn’t want to spoil me

I vowed never to do that to my own children so they come first all the time

They have grown up to be kind, confident, and hard working.

Report
StoppinBy · 10/10/2019 02:04

@longlongsummer IMO your example is terrible and your idea of wants and needs are out of wack.

Stepchildren need to feel they are not being excluded - their father just had a baby who is there sibling and yes they do need to be able to bond with that child. Not sure how you feel that wanting them gone for a week would facilitate that?

On the other hand many many women have given birth/had c/sections and then gone home to their other children. Do you think that only the mothers biological children have a right to be included in welcoming baby home?

All mothers want peace and yes at some stage they all need it but cutting step children out of this important time is a very selfish want, not a need.

In my view children's needs come first and their wants should always be considered by their parents/guardians but are not as important as the adults wants.

Report
RainbowMum11 · 10/10/2019 02:10

It's needs vs wants.
Needs absolutely should be prioritised, wants, not always - that's what's potentially damaging.

Report
mathanxiety · 10/10/2019 02:10

Maybe a good example would be an expensive school trip abroad that a family would be very stretched to afford.

I disagree about blended families. It depends very much on the age of the children involved, and maybe on the sensitivity of the parents. If the blending happens when the DCs are young they can frequently figure out a way to become a solid family. It can also frequently be very advantageous from a financial pov to amalgamate households, and this can nearly always benefit the children. Obv if a blended family features children from one or two previous relationships plus children of the third relationship, then blending is necessary.

Report
Pixxie7 · 10/10/2019 02:50

Whilst no one can really argue that children’s needs should come first. It’s a worrying trend that they should come first in everything. Parents have a responsibility to bring up their children to be active members of society, always being put first is not going to happen.
Therefore we have a responsibility to ensure they realise this from a young age.

Report
BadSun · 10/10/2019 03:03

I've never actually seen anyone saying childrens' wants should always come first.

Report
Userzzzzz · 10/10/2019 03:09

Yes children’s ‘needs’ should come first but as part of that, I believe children need to learn that they can’t always come first, they sometimes they need to think about others and they can’t have everything they want. I’d also say that some ‘needs’ are ridiculous so the parent needs to make a sensible decision on behalf of their child.

Report
Userzzzzz · 10/10/2019 03:10

Eg my 3 year old frequently thinks she needs something that she doesn’t. She doesn’t understand the difference between need or want.

Report
Zippetydoodahzippetyay · 10/10/2019 03:30

Absolutely agree with those of you who say their needs should be prioritised but not necessarily their wants.

I always try to remember though that you can't serve from an empty vessel. If you don't take care of your own physical, mental and emotional health, you won't be the best parent you can be.

Report
edgeofheaven · 10/10/2019 04:53

I was watching "Queer Eye" on Netflix and there was a couple who had given the master bedroom to their 8 year old daughter. The father slept in the basement and the mother slept on the sofa. This was because the 8 year old didn't want to share with a sibling Confused The Fab Five rightly told them - you are the adults, you pay for this home, you need proper sleep and rest to work and care for the family, and your relationship will suffer if you are sleeping separately. Clear case of prioritising a child's want over the rest of the family's needs.

Report
Bobthefishermanswife · 10/10/2019 05:25

To an extent you are right op.
It's mine and dps relationship, our son is here because of our love for eachother.
As a baby of course his needs come first, but as a parent it's my job to teach him independence, so as he gets older, he will still be a priority, but he won't always be number one.

Report
Limpshade · 10/10/2019 05:33

I have seen it that desperately tired posters hoping to sleep train, get their toddler to sleep in their bed, etc etc have found short shrift from a small number of posters to the tune of, "They're only young once, just cosleep with them until adulthood - that's what I did". Except for cases where it's a very small baby, I do think a mother needs to put herself first sometimes. Everybody agrees that PND is an awful, awful thing, but comments like that which place a mother's mental health below everything else surely feed into it.

Report
Waxonwaxoff0 · 10/10/2019 05:41

The holidays abroad thing is ridiculous.

But in the case of step parenting, I think blended families are more hassle than they're worth and rarely di

Report
Waxonwaxoff0 · 10/10/2019 05:43

Posted too soon.

Rarely does everyone come out of it unscathed. Personal experience of it as a child was negative for me and for that reason I have chosen not to have a relationship while DS is a child.


Material things are another thing entirely. DS doesn't get everything he wants just because he wants it.

Report
Sockwomble · 10/10/2019 06:02

With my son his needs come first and then his wants are considered along with everyone else's. Whether something is a need or want varies between children and families. For example there are lots of situations where I wouldn't take my child somewhere or keep him there because I know he won't or isn't coping with them. In that situation I might want to be there but he needs not to so we don't go.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Tumbleweed101 · 10/10/2019 06:02

The person in the household whose needs are greatest should be prioritised, whether that is an adult or a child. Families work together so everyone is supported. For example
a parent who is struggling with a health issue should have their needs met before a child’s if the impact of not doing so will be detrimental to the family.

Children are not more important than anyone else in a family and adults have the knowledge and experience to have the final say on a situation.

Report
Overtime2019 · 10/10/2019 06:18

Kids come before anyone end of

Report
Cherrysherbet · 10/10/2019 06:21

I do agree with you op, and I feel this ‘my little princess’ thing is getting quite worrying. We are going to end up with a population full of very disappointed people when they realise life isn’t always a bowl of cherries, and they don’t always come first.

I must say though, my children have everything they need, and more.
I WANT some new boots, My 8yr old Dd WANTS some new boots. I can’t justify buying us both some this week. Guess who’s getting some at the weekend hmmmmmm.....not me!
With the holiday situation, we would not be going on holiday if I couldn’t afford it, just because my children wanted it, but smaller things I always let them have before I think of myself...that’s normal, isn’t it?

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.