My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

To think the anti-pink brigade can be a bit OTT

206 replies

NeedACleverNN · 05/04/2016 18:02

I have noticed on here there are some people who refuse to allow their girls wear anything pink/sparkly/overly feminine. A lot of the reasoning seems to be because it sets women back 100 years etc etc and gender neutral stuff.

However the same people are eager to point out they don't care if their son wears it and in fact actively encourage them to do so.

AIBU to think pink is just a colour and if girls want to enjoy pink and princesses and babies and pushchairs they should be able to just as much as a boy can?

OP posts:
Report
DinosaursRoar · 05/04/2016 18:46

I have complained a lot now that DS is wearing clothes for over 7 (so not in the "1 - 7 years" ranges), that colours have all disappeared, theres a see of dull, mini-adult clothes, the girls ranges for those ages do still seem to have a range of colours, even if they are also mini-adult clothes. I'd be happy with bright blue again, it's the sludgey green, grey and dark blue that's so boring. (It doesn't suit DS's colouring at all, he's looking all washed out.)

Report
Waltermittythesequel · 05/04/2016 18:48

The campaign mentioned is literally called Pink Stinks!

I don't think it's a big stretch to call that anti-pink.

Report
Coldtoeswarmheart · 05/04/2016 18:49

And yes, boy's clothes over age 7 are very grey and navy. Dull dull dull.

Report
Muskateersmummy · 05/04/2016 18:50

I agree too OP. The problem with "children's toys" is that children themselves quickly label things boys and girls toys. I don't refer to boys and girls toys, neither does her preschool or her grandparents. Yet over the past few weeks she has walked me past certain things in the toy shops saying they are boys toys. These are toys she would have played with before, she's only just turning 4 so she can't read, the knowledge of boys and girls toys comes from somewhere and I'm not convinced it's from labelling in shops.

Report
imeatingthechocolate · 05/04/2016 18:50

some people i know have gone entirely the opposite way they go OTT on dressing there boys in pink because it's fashionable to have a gender fluid child same parents practically shoving a barbie at them everytime you go to a toddler group

should be a let kids be kids campaign

Report
soapboxqueen · 05/04/2016 18:51

Don't know anyone who has banned their daughter from wearing pink or even suggested it. However, I get irritated at the pinkification of pretty much any item aimed at girls, particularly clothing. I hate the fact that clothes aimed at girls are often less practical, or not as warm as similar clothing in the boys section. My dd often ends up with clothing from the boys section because the stuff in the girls section is obviously for children who stay indoors. She also has boys shoes for similar reasons.

I hate the fact that boys clothing is often limited in range in comparison to the girls section and I object to some of the slogans etc that get put on both boys and girls clothing.

I went to an excellent training day by Gary Wilson about how stereotypes harm boys and their chances of success in school.

Report
MrsDeVere · 05/04/2016 18:51

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Itinerary · 05/04/2016 18:52

The campaign mentioned is literally called Pink Stinks!

Yes, and it wouldn't exist if there hadn't been such heavy-handed promotion of pink in the first place. It didn't just spring from nowhere.

Report
ThroughThickAndThin01 · 05/04/2016 18:53

Pink Stinks is yes, fuckingoutrageous.

Whatever next blue is poo?

Report
Waltermittythesequel · 05/04/2016 18:53


I am referring to the name of the campaign.

It's not outside the realms of possibility to think that the colour pink and its fans are being targeted.
Report
Imfinehowareyou · 05/04/2016 18:54

MrsDevere I completely agree with what you've said and it's how I see the whole anti pink stance...however, I am surrounded by parents who DO see 'we shouldn't restrict our children's choices to pink for girls and blue for boys' and they read 'GIRLS MUSTN'T EVER WEAR PINK!!!' It's really wearing. Please can you come to our school and give a talk? Grin

Report
merrymouse · 05/04/2016 18:55

Have never heard of anyone banning pink. However it is annoying and frankly stupid that so many toys and basic clothes like t-shirts are gendered either for boys or for girls.

Report
CountessOfStrathearn · 05/04/2016 18:55

I'm like MrsDeVere. I want to dress my male and female children in bright colours. I want to have more choice than just pink/frills for my DDs and sludge colours for my DSs.

(I have found that both Tesco and Sainsbury's are pretty good for nice bright colours if anyone is looking.)

Report
NeedACleverNN · 05/04/2016 18:55

Speaking of boys clothes why is there no variety?!

Girls aisles have at least one full one maybe two of various colours and patterns.

Boys have half an aisle if we are lucky and they are all either blue, red or green and have either cars, trucks or dinosaurs on them.

OP posts:
Report
Waltermittythesequel · 05/04/2016 18:56

If the campaign is about equality and diversity for both genders, why is it called Pink Stinks?

Genuine question.

Report
ThroughThickAndThin01 · 05/04/2016 18:58

I'm totally with you walter the word 'stinks' gives out nothing but negative meaning.

Report
NeedACleverNN · 05/04/2016 18:59

For anyone who says they have never seen it, this came up on my FB feed from mn blog.

ohdollydosh.co.uk/2016/04/04/i-need-a-dress-mummy-when-children-conform-to-stereotypes/

OP posts:
Report
merrymouse · 05/04/2016 18:59

I think it's because pink and stink rhyme.

However, I do agree that there is danger that rather than saying anyone can wear pink, the message could be read as anything that is pink and sparkly is less good.

Report
AndYourBirdCanSing · 05/04/2016 19:00

I agree OP.

I'm a feminist and it actually really pisses me off. It's gone too much the other way now.

Report
Itinerary · 05/04/2016 19:00

Have never heard of anyone banning pink.

Nope, me neither.

Report
MrsDeVere · 05/04/2016 19:00

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LassWiTheDelicateAir · 05/04/2016 19:01

and I'm a fully paid up dungaree-wearing feminist

And you don't see the irony in that statement?

Report

Newsletters you might like

Discover Exclusive Savings!

Sign up to our Money Saver newsletter now and receive exclusive deals and hot tips on where to find the biggest online bargains, tailored just for Mumsnetters.

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Parent-Approved Gems Await!

Subscribe to our weekly Swears By newsletter and receive handpicked recommendations for parents, by parents, every Sunday.

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

TheDowagerCuntess · 05/04/2016 19:02

should be a let kids be kids campaign

Here you go.

Report
MrsDeVere · 05/04/2016 19:03

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

VikingVolva · 05/04/2016 19:03

Pink Stinks isn't anti-pink.

I repeat what has been quoted above: "Pinkstinks is a campaign that targets the products, media and marketing that prescribe heavily stereotyped and limiting roles to young girls. We believe that all children – girls and boys - are affected by the ‘pinkification’ of girlhood."

It's anti the stereotyping and limitation of excessive pink, which is something that has grown up (marketing?) in recent years. It wasn't an issue at all in my childhood, and also far less so when my DC (now teens) were younger.

It does not seek to 'ban' pink, as even the briefest look at their website shows.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.