My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

to be disappointed that someone didn't offer

166 replies

BillyNotQuiteNoMates · 20/01/2014 02:25

I've just read the thread about a train journey with a buggy and it put me in mind of a situation I saw recently. I wondered how many people would have moved..
I boarded an aeroplane with my DH and 5 DCs, none of whom had flown before and were all nervous (truth be told, I'm terrified myself) there weren't enough seats in one row for all of us so DH sat between 2 DCs, I sat between 2 DCs and oldest sat alone (he didn't mind). Plane filled up and just before take off, a young family boarded. There was a Mum with a baby, a Dad and young girl (approx 2yo). There were no seats together, so Mum sat in a single seat with baby on lap, Dad sat in another with DD behind him. She was distraught, obviously scared and broke her heart. He was trying to hold her hand but couldn't because everyone needed to be strapped in. I was really shocked that no-one offered to swap with him so he could sit with his DD, even if it had just been for the take-off, and it was only an hour long flight anyway. I genuinely would have done so myself if my own DCs hadn't been so nervous. I don't know how they got to the airport but if they were on a transport bus, they would have had no control over what time they got to the airport (in case people post that they should have got there earlier). So, if you had no DCs to consider, would you have offered?

OP posts:
Report
amicissimma · 21/01/2014 18:40

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

SeaSickSal · 21/01/2014 18:37

UK health and safety laws. A two year old without proper supervision and a caretaker should an accident occur would certainly break UK health and safety laws regarding proper assessment of risk and duty of care.

Report
BoneyBackJefferson · 21/01/2014 18:24

Floggin

Because the OP has children which makes her exempt and the responsibility for other peoples children should fall on the singleton which is somewhat ironic.

Report
Floggingmolly · 21/01/2014 13:09

Why didn't you offer to move, op, instead of sitting there feeling "sad" that nobody else did?

Report
amyshellfish · 21/01/2014 12:50

The crew should have asked someone IF the parents asked them to. They didn't so we can only presume the parents didn't actually care that much that their child was sat separately.

Primarily the child is the parents responsibly.

Report
WooWooOwl · 21/01/2014 08:09

I agree it doesn't matter what the parents ought to have done.

What would matter to me is sitting with my own family if I have made an effort to be able to do so, whether that be by turning up early, standing at the gate for ages to be at the front of the queue instead of taking my time at duty free, or paying for allocated seating.

I doubt anyone would deny a seat swap just because they are judging parents, they would do it because they have every right to prioritise themselves if they have a reason for wanting to keep their seat.

Report
Gileswithachainsaw · 21/01/2014 08:09

It's just not possible most the time is it grennie

Who's looking after our kids while we sort out everyone else's.

Report
Grennie · 21/01/2014 07:56

I don't think adults should always put every child they meet first!

Report
Jinsei · 21/01/2014 07:37

I'd have swapped happily on a short flight like this. Yes, I'd have been Hmm at the parents for not booking seats or paying for priority boarding, but that's not the little girl's fault. Poor little thing. The crew should have asked someone to move.

Report
Gileswithachainsaw · 21/01/2014 07:37

amy actually you raise a good point. Doesn't seem to matter where you go, what you do , how much time , inconvenience or money it costs you, somehow despite the presence of parents, grand parents, older brothers etc , some random child will be your responsibility I.
And no matter what fuck up the parents make, the innocent bystander who is the one who's being unreasonable.

I'd of course help

But it is the parents responsibility to ask we arebt mind readers

Report
Bodicea · 21/01/2014 07:23

I once got asked to move when I was 14 on a long flight on my own so a couple could sit together. Being 14 and someone who wouldn't say Booh to a goose I said sure. I went from a nice comfortable ailse seat to being sat in the middle row, in between two extremely large and slightly smelly middle aged men. I spent the whole flight not daring to move!
They were there before I sat down so the woman who swapped with me must have known. To this day I can't believe that someone could do that to a young girl on her own.
Would still move for someone though if they needed to sit together (but would assess the situation first ;-) )

Report
amyshellfish · 21/01/2014 07:08

Ah yep I'm a bitch because I think a child accompanied by two parents with tongues in their heads isn't my responsibility.

Child crying on their own with no parent apparently in sight, is absolutely my problem and there's no way I would ignore. I think that helping a child where help is actually required makes me not a bitch but what do I know eh?

Report
Morgause · 21/01/2014 07:02

bunbaker The crying child would never be sitting next to me because I always book a window seat (anxiety around claustrophobia) and my DH would be between me and her/him. My level of anxiety at take off and landing would be so high I doubt I'd notice.

Presumably the child would move to a parent's lap as soon as the seatbelt signs went off.

Report
BoneyBackJefferson · 21/01/2014 06:54

It has nothing to do with what the parents 'ought' to have done

Yes it does, if the parents had sorted seating out, then the situation would never had happened.

all adults, regardless of their relationship to the child, should put children before themselves as children are vulnerable citizens and require greater levels of care.

interesting how this only appears to be the case when (some) parents want it to.

This is so basic a human concept that it's actually shocking that society is failing so much in teaching people of their duties to those less able than themselves.

Unless the law has changed there is no duty of care to others in this situation and if there was why do the parents seem to be exempt form it?

Report
Bunbaker · 21/01/2014 06:50

"Adults don't have to dance attendance on every crying child, they really don't."

And if the crying child was someone else's seated next to you on a plane because it couldn't sit with its parent, what then?

Report
Bunbaker · 21/01/2014 06:48

"I think that is a very sad reflection of society that people would rather judge the parents for not booking a seat and refuse to move on principle (and because they had paid an extra tenner) than actually put the needs of a terrified and sobbing 2 year old first. Surely at that point anyone decent and without special needs of their own would say to the parent "your poor dd, let me swap so you can comfort her". Does it really matter if parents had been disorganised/naive/tightwads at this point? Surely the sight of a terrified toddler trumps all that?"

I agree.

Report
willyoulistentome · 21/01/2014 06:45

amyshellfish yes it does make you sound like a bitch.

Report
Morgause · 21/01/2014 06:39

It has nothing to do with what the parents 'ought' to have done, all adults, regardless of their relationship to the child, should put children before themselves as children are vulnerable citizens and require greater levels of care. This is so basic a human concept that it's actually shocking that society is failing so much in teaching people of their duties to those less able than themselves.

There are adults who are every bit as vulnerable as children. An elderly adult with arthritis who books a seat so she can travel in comfort trumps a crying child for me. Children cry. Adults don't have to dance attendance on every crying child, they really don't.

Report
wobblyweebles · 21/01/2014 01:04

An airline would not seat a two year old alone. If the person in the seat next to her had touched her up they would have been sued to buggery. Can't see the other passengers being delighted about being sat next to an unsupervised toddler. Plus all the h&s laws it would have broken.

Which H&S laws exactly? In which country?

Report
BrianTheMole · 21/01/2014 00:11
Hmm
Report
cardamomginger · 21/01/2014 00:08

Really? I think it's bloody hilarious.

Report
BrianTheMole · 21/01/2014 00:06

I'm really not seeing the humor in that link
cardamomginger

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Caitlin17 · 20/01/2014 23:51

I'd have moved. I'm usually on my own or with grown up son. He and I don't need to sit together and we do sit separately if it allows others who want/need to sit together to do so.

Report
Caitlin17 · 20/01/2014 23:41

I'd have moved. I'm usually on my own or with grown up son. He and I don't need to sit together and we do sit separately if it allows others who want/need to sit together to do so.

Report
cardamomginger · 20/01/2014 23:35

Am I allowed to lighten the mood by posting a link to a Hitler Rant? Password's comment about flying business class with Lufthansa just made it too tempting Grin

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.