I feel strongly that something should be subsidised with sanitary protection. With the basics for everybody there are subsidies, which as you've mentioned previously include benefits to cover the essential costs of shelter, warm, food and water, free NHS prescriptions to cover illness-related costs, free condoms, and free STI testing. This includes incontinence protection. And the Government are currently subsidising reusable nappies, and provide additional benefits for children. But, there is this extra cost just for women, and for all women of childbearing age, and that just isn't fair. If it was men that menstruated, I bet that that would be covered too!
To say that sanitary protection is only to protect our clothing, well surely nappies, incontinence products and loo roll in public loos are too? No, sanitary protection is for our dignity. I can bet that if we didn't have any, it wouldn't just be our clothing ruined, either. I would imagine there would be pools of blood left all over seats in public areas (private too!) and we'd find both us and men constantly trying to dodge the random stranger's bloody stuff. And then there is the extra cost that women would have to pay to clean or replace their clothing.
If you take the example of a teenage girl on £1 a week pocket money and parents that expect her to buy all her own toiletries as they're a 'luxury', then she may very well have to spend her entire month's pocket money just to have some dignity. Whereas, the same parents have a teenage son, and he can spend the whole £4 on whatever he likes! The same concept carries forward to later life, where some women unfortunately find themselves dependent on benefits. If benefits are only meant to cover the basic essentials, then either women aren't getting enough, or men are being overpaid? Either way, men have that little bit extra to spend on whatever they like every month, whereas women have this essential burden.
Something should change if our society wants to keep up the pretense of sexual equality. Threaten your GP that you'll get pregnant to stop your periods until they give you free sanitary protection (which, of course, the NHS will pick up the pieces for at a hugely inflated cost), take loo roll from hospitals and GP surgeries to use for sanitary protection (so the NHS are paying for sanitary protection), go on strike and leave bloody pools everywhere for men to dodge! Yes, they're extreme examples, but the men that run this company need to take notice.
In the meantime, I do think that reusable sanitary protection is a good idea, for our pockets and the environment. Not least because it seems to be a way to avoid paying VAT on being female! But, as mentioned previously, the Government do subsidise reusable nappies, so it is only fair to be subsiding reusable sanitary protection too. The whole idea of the scheme is to save the environment, right? Well, shouldn't they be doing the same for sanitary protection, at the very least to save the environment?? I'm really not sure how the amount of disposable nappies and disposable sanitary protection currently dumped in landfills compares, but they're surely in the same ballpark? Sure, babies use more nappies in the short-term, but then they grow up and stop using them. Women can use disposable sanitary protection, for say, an eighth to a quarter of their lives for 40 years, and that's a whole half of the population? It soon stacks up.
In conclusion, there are subsidies for every basic essential and every method of giving dignity back to people in this country, except this one area specific to women, and that just isn't fair. Something should change. I'm only in my 20s and I've already noticed this and it frustrates me, imagine how I'll feel after another 20-30 of essentially paying a tax on being female! A female allergic to normal sanitary protection at that, so not even via the cheapest available method! And yes, I have told numerous doctors about my allergy and they simply don't care. Any other allergy? They probably would. Female-specific allergy? No chance. I once rocked up to an STI clinic because of the state 'downstairs' was in due to this, and they confirmed that I'd had 'a severe allergic reaction to sanitary towels' and they just gave me some antihistamines and sent me on my way, dreading the next time I menstruated. Oh, and the state 'downstairs' was in, led to me developing a yeast infection on top, so that was another cost for them to treat and for me to worry about each month. Surely prevention is better than cure...? Nope, because I'm a woman and should just suck it up or pay for the priviledge of comfort and dignity
Tried signing the petition, but it was closed.