My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

to think English teachers should be able to spell?

88 replies

teenyweenytadpole · 03/10/2012 22:19

DD is yr 7 so just started new school, just as background she is excellent at English, put forward for level 6 SATs (got a high 5 in the end which she was delighted with). Anyway I was looking through her school books and noticed her English teacher had commented "I liked how each sentence had some good descripsion" and then added "check to see theres no missing words". So poor spelling, poor grammar and poor punctuation! I am not very impressed but feel if I comment to the school it seems kind of petty. I just think it's a shame, English is DD's best subject and I would hope that she would be taught by teachers with a more impressive command of the language than this.

OP posts:
Report
Woozley · 04/10/2012 19:30

I could allow for something which is clearly a typo or oversight, but the OP's example demonstrates a worrying lack of basic knowledge, I would say. I wouldn't expect a teacher of any subject to make such errors.

Report
DoverBeach · 04/10/2012 19:33

Peer marking? If not, that's terrible.

Report
LesleyPumpshaft · 04/10/2012 20:00

To be fair OP's punctuation is irrelevant. She's only posting on a forum, not teaching children the Queen's English.

The teacher could have made more of an effort I s'pose.

Report
BrianAndHisBalls · 04/10/2012 20:14

At our 'meet the teacher' night for yr 3 dd last week the teacher had written:

ROUTEINE

on the whiteboard.

Kill me now.

Report
Bonsoir · 05/10/2012 11:28

ROFL at ROUTEINE.

Did anyone say anything?

Report
TheGOLDCunnyFunt · 05/10/2012 12:12

Shock at routeine! I would've had to point it out.

Report
VeritableSmorgasbord · 05/10/2012 12:18

I cannot imagine how people put themselves forward to BE English teachers if they haven't got a grasp of spelling and punctuation.

I can't do gymnastics, I'm not going to become a bloody acrobat...

Report
Thewidewideworld · 05/10/2012 12:36

I'd really like the OP to come back and let us know if she has checked with her DD whether it was actually the teacher who wrote that comment.

Report
sassytheFIRST · 05/10/2012 12:37

Ditto, widewideworld. I keep checking the thread to see!

Report
BrianAndHisBalls · 05/10/2012 13:14

sadly no one said anything. There were many raised eyebrows but I imagine it was felt too cruel to mention in public Grin

Report
Bonsoir · 05/10/2012 16:27

Shock Shock Shock

Report
WindyandWet · 05/10/2012 16:34

This just reminds me of the great fun I had when I was 12 when I asked my English teacher what was wrong with the word "playwright" as in "the playwright William Shakespeare".

She asked me how to spell "write" so I did, and she attempted to walk off. But I asked her how to spell "wheelwright" whilst getting out my dictionary and opening it at the appropriate page! Tee hee. (She took it in good humour).

I also regularly enjoyed correcting my biology teachers Latin! They must all have hated me!!!

Report
cardibach · 05/10/2012 18:17

Peer marking is not about speling, whoever was criticising use of the technique. It is about pupils grasping what makes a good newspaper article, story, speech or whatever and commenting on that. It helps them to improve their own work. Spellings will still be corrected by a teacher.

Report
Brycie · 05/10/2012 19:53

Cardibach, I doubt your last sentence. And who are peers to judge "what makes a good newspaper article". Half the time the teachers don't know.

Report
teenyweenytadpole · 05/10/2012 21:49

OMG I am so embarrassed - sorry everyone but in turns out the comments were made by a classmate, they had been doing some form of peer assessment. I stand corrected and am very sorry!!

OP posts:
Report
Brycie · 05/10/2012 22:00

It's still rubbish. Smile The teacher should be checking it.

Report
Thewidewideworld · 05/10/2012 23:15

TeenyWeeny - thanks for coming back and clearing that up! I am so pleased to be right about what the likely explanation was!

Brycie - I think you are failing to understand the point of peer assessment. It is an important skill that we need to teach so that by the time they reach KS4 age children are able to take an objective view of the their own work and that of others and understand how to apply success criteria and recognise what level they are at and what they need to do to improve. Without that skill they are unable to analyse their work. Very few Y7s can do it well, it is a difficult thing to master, but they need to practise it.

Report
WilfSell · 05/10/2012 23:23

We had a good old guffaw at DS3's leaflet, which arrived exactly as typed below:


Your literacy target for this term is:

to use more capital letters and full stops at the end of your sentences

Report
ravenAK · 05/10/2012 23:32

Oh good, I thought it might be peer assessment.

Nice thoughtful comments from fellow year 7 pupil, although I'd get them to be slightly more precise if top set - what was good about the description? What techniques were used? - & maybe highlight examples in their peer's work.

Brycie, I think it's fair, & kindest, to say that you don't fully understand what peer assessment is.

Report
Spermysextowel · 06/10/2012 04:25

What is peer assessment? I remember my sister marking other pupils' books, but that was back in the 70s & my parents just thought it was the teachers being rather lazy.

Report
Brycie · 06/10/2012 07:35

Smile ravenak I do, I don't think much of it though. Each sentence might not have had good descripsion and there may have been no missing words. But where's the teacher to point that out?

Report
Thewidewideworld · 06/10/2012 14:12

Brycie - you don't. Quite clearly.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Brycie · 06/10/2012 14:41

Do share. Smile

Report
Thewidewideworld · 06/10/2012 14:43

I provided an explanation several posts down. Perhaps you'd like to read it again.

Report
Brycie · 06/10/2012 14:49

"Help them in learning to evaluate their own learning and in interpreting assessment criteria" - they should not need to mark each others work to do this
"increasing feedback to students" - from their peers? they don't want that - they want and need assessment from someone, a teacher, who knows their stuff
"reducing marking loads for staff" - uh huh
"giving students a sense of ownership of the assessment process" - at the cost of teacher assessment
"encouraging students to be more involved and take more responsibility for their learning" - at the cost of teacher assessment

"However, disadvantages may be encountered when students lack the ability to evaluate each other, do not take it seriously, or fear discrimination." you can say that again

Worthwhile in Y13 and 13? maybe. Worthwhile in class debate? definitely. Worth the cost in teacher assessment otherwise? Not in my opinion. I'll have to beg to differ.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.