My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

Why do people enjoy picking others up on their spelling or grammar

385 replies

TakeMeDrunkImHome · 31/05/2011 01:29

i have noticed this a LOT here, and i am fairly new. Is there some kind of badge that is awarded if you spell every word correctly and use every term in the correct way. Some people seem to respond to a particular thread just to correct the OP with their spelling or punctuation or grammar. WHY? Not everyone has a masters in english. Not everyone is awesome with spelling or grammar. Is it some way of making yourself look better than the next person?

OP posts:
Report
nijinsky · 02/06/2011 21:25

Yes, the difficulty with "you" and "yous" is that "you" is now doing what "thou" and "thee" used to do, as well as being the plural. So in losing thou, thee, thy, etc English actually lost a lot as you have one word doing 4 jobs previously done by 4 different words!

I don't think English has an official enshrined version in law, unlike Norwegian or Dutch for example. Therefore you can make a case for saying that some dialects are more correct by retaining certain grammatical conventions!

I guess for a long time there have been attempts to impose firstly "southern English" and then R.P. as the correct version of English.

LOL at TrillionAstra quite a good idea for some situations!

Report
FellatioNelson · 02/06/2011 20:31

Grin An ipad is way beyond my meagre capabilities. I'm still on Key Stage One of texting.

Report
RustyBear · 02/06/2011 17:32

Fellatio - if you are paranoid about getting it's/its wrong, don't get an iPad. It insists on putting the apostrophe in at all times. But then a autocorrect function that can turn 'get home' into 'gerbils' is probably capable of anything.

Report
verlainechasedrimbauds · 02/06/2011 16:47

This little rant (if you can get past the advertisement at the beginning) seems appropriate for the thread. I can't do press-ups either...

Report
WhatsWrongWithYou · 02/06/2011 15:42

Yes, 'you' is a plural, I was just responding to your question re the plural of it.
Not saying it's correct, but when addressing one person, one might say 'where are you going?' whereas if addressing a group, 'where are youse going?' would be used.

It distinguishes between the two, but tbh I always think it makes people sound thick Smile.

Report
TrillianAstra · 02/06/2011 14:13

I think a really useful addition to the language would be a separation of inclusive vs exclusive "we".

"We (I and some other people) are going to the park" Byeeeee
"We (I and you and optionally some other people) are going to the park" So get your coat and come on

Report
nijinsky · 02/06/2011 12:58

Technically, "you" is the plural, as English dropped the actual plural for this word ("je" possibly?) a few hundred years ago hence it struggles to replace the emphasis of changing from the singular to the plural.

All this grammatical information is not my own, but has come from two German friends who are linguists!

Report
WhatsWrongWithYou · 02/06/2011 12:22

In Liverpool, where I'm from, the plural of 'you' is 'youse.' Came in quite handy but I don't think I ever used it once I realised it wasn't used in written English. < pedant >

Report
handsomeharry · 01/06/2011 23:24

Couldn't agree with you more! Smile

Report
beesimo · 01/06/2011 23:17

HH

Teachers should not say arse they should say bottom I am shocked and appalled the riff raff they allow on MN.



My DDs are home safe so I shall now go to me bedxx

Report
handsomeharry · 01/06/2011 23:15

Sorry beesimo - the dialect doesn't do anything for me. I am a mardy bugger though! Grin

Report
nijinsky · 01/06/2011 23:13

And a perfect display of all the grammatical conventions that English has now lost, but which make it much more meaningful in just a few words. This is why English struggles to replace the words it has lost - how do you say the plural of "you"?

Report
beesimo · 01/06/2011 23:08

One of our yard dogs is called Harry he's hes a mardy bugger too!

Report
handsomeharry · 01/06/2011 23:05

Does anyone else get goosebumps reading Beesimo's posts?

No, not really. I do get a pain in my arse though - does that count?

Report
WhatsWrongWithYou · 01/06/2011 23:01

Does anyone else get goosebumps reading Beesimo's posts?
Extraordinary and compelling. Grin

Report
beesimo · 01/06/2011 22:46

Nijinsky

You are very quick witted to work me poem out so well.


I love THEE means I love YOU

I am THINE means I am YOURS as in my HEART is yours

THOU must not means YOU must not


On the night we first 'spoke' DH said to me

'Aa's thine, thees mine, thass it' or in English 'I'm yours, your mine, that's it'

When a proper Yorkshire lad says 'thass it' at the end of a sentence it means more than any signed and witnessed contract ever could, it means end of discussion my word is my bond and that is my final word on the subject.

Report
nijinsky · 01/06/2011 22:16

Or even from incorrect spelling! (with no "and")

Report
usualsuspect · 01/06/2011 22:16

I speak with a local accent ,some people think that is wrong though

Report
nijinsky · 01/06/2011 22:14

Re writing in dialect - if no-one does it, we will lose it. Obviously its good to have the ability to change for formal settings, but I distinguish it from incorrect and spelling.

For what is the English we speak? Merely one of the dialects that was chosen to be "proper English". Wasn't it the dialect of Wessex? But if you speak other Germanic languages, of which English is one, English is strangely irregular and unstructured. The grammar represented by the dialects is often much more advanced. e.g. the retention of the second person singular thee, thine and thou. Its much more in keeping with all the other Germanic languages. Likewise the prefixing of verbs to make the past tense. English has dropped it mostly, but retains it in some cases (e.g. alike, afraid, beholden). If you are used to this more logical form of grammar, it is easier to learn other languages (and understand different dialects that use it).

I'm also not entirely sure of the status of some no longer commonly used grammatical conventions in English? (e.g. those above). Are they correct English or not? If they are not in common usage, does that make them wrong? Or are they still correct English usage, albeit archaic, because most people do understand the meaning of thee, thine and thou, etc.? Does anyone know what the "official version" of all this is?

Report
nijinsky · 01/06/2011 22:00

Well, bearing in mind its a poem, I think I got most of it at first reading:

In all your doings in the world
Do right with all your might
Wrong never can
be right, you know
And as through life you go
Keep straight

From early youth, to hoary age
You should make your delight
To do your best for each other
And kindly help a fallen brother
To keep straight

Should money tempt you to do wrong
Just give this thought some weight
Shall I be happier with this money
I doubt you know it, just let it pass
Keep straight

Deal honestly with everyone
Then you'll feel happy quite
Don't dirty your mouth with any lie
Whatever the consequence may be
Keep straight

Half the misery there is in the world
We soon would put to flight
God sent us lots of happiness
But Man's devious ways often make it less
Keep straight

(No connections to Yorkshire or Northumberland whatsoever)

Report
usualsuspect · 01/06/2011 21:50

Even I can't understand that Bee

Report
FellatioNelson · 01/06/2011 20:29

haven't got a clue, sorry.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

FellatioNelson · 01/06/2011 20:27

Well that's all very well Beesimo, but the whole point of clear, correct, unambiguous standard English is that we can all understand it. Not just people who live in our immediate vicinity. Your Yorkshire poem may be very entertaining but I have got a fecking clue what any of it means and neither has 99.9% of the rest of the UK population. Grin

Report
senua · 01/06/2011 19:38

I'm with CJCregg. If someone's post is too difficult to read then I gloss over it. MNing is entirely voluntary, there is no compulsion to read or comment on every posting, so if it involves too much 'translation' then I ignore it.
I am not the only one: maypole1 posted quite a bit yesterday and, as the day wore on, fewer and fewer people addressed her posts. It looks like they couldn't be bothered to spend the time deciphering. Her loss.

Just as there is no MN law saying that people should use good SPag, there is also no MN law that says that I have to read everything.

Report
beesimo · 01/06/2011 18:42

nijinsky

Thaa gets it!

Iv all ye deeins i' this world,
Deea reet wi' all yer might;
Wrang nivver can
be reet, yeh knaw,
An seea as through life yeh goa
Keep Stright

Frae heearly youth, to hoary age,
You shud mackt your delight
To do your best for yan anudder,
And kahndly help a fallin' brudder
To Keep Stright

Shud money tempt yea to deea wrang
Just give this thowt somm weight
Sall Ah be happier wi' this brass?
Ah doubt ya weeant; seea lei it pass
Keep Stright

Deal honestly wiv ivvery yan.
Then you'll feel happy quite
Don't muck yer mouth wi' onny lie,
Whativver t consequence may be.
Keep Stright


Hawf t' misery there is in't world
We seean wud put te flight.
God sent us lots o' happiness
But Mans creeeakt ways oft make it less.
Keep Stright



Lass 2 typing as Mam to slow

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.