My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Is it even worth discussing what a colossal bellend Farrage is?

52 replies

mcmoonfucker · 20/01/2014 22:10

giant arse

OP posts:
Report
TheDoctrineOf2014 · 20/01/2014 23:03

Space is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is....

But it's still dwarfed by the monstrous hugeness of his bellendity.

Report
hazchem · 20/01/2014 23:19

That is one of the funniest things I've read, it's only slightly undermined but the truthfulness of it

Report
lackingideas · 21/01/2014 00:11

What I found most depressing its that this wasn't a blunder that he'd backtrack on or apologise for. It appears those were acceptable things to say, and will probably earn him votes or political donations.

Report
AnyFucker · 21/01/2014 00:15

let me try to put it into words....

nah

can't be arsed

Report
NigellasDealer · 21/01/2014 00:16

no.
like 'bellendity' though Grin

Report
ThingsThatGoBumpInTheNight · 21/01/2014 00:19

I see him I'm reminded of that blue eagle in the muppets

And the word bawbag Grin

Report
BlueSkySunnyDay · 21/01/2014 00:20

No - batshit crazy

Report
BelleCurve · 21/01/2014 06:21

Trouble is, I reckon the majority of people actually agree with him on this one Angry

Report
merrymouse · 21/01/2014 06:39

It's really not surprising that some men in the city might find it difficult to work out how to employ a woman, poor loves.

I mean, they've found the whole "employing honest people who won't completely @% things up and who can understand the difference between banking and working in a betting shop" thing quite challenging too.

Report
MomsStiffler · 21/01/2014 09:07

I think it'd be naive to think it couldn't be detrimental in some cases. But that's also the case for people that take any time off - due to injury/illness for example.

But if you suggested to a rugby playing city boy that he'd be less employable because he plays, or that people shouldn't go on skiing trips there would be uproar!

Report
MomsStiffler · 21/01/2014 09:09

And I don't like the fact that his attitude is "I can't change that" - that's just lazy!!

Report
ThinkAboutItTomorrow · 21/01/2014 09:22

I think it's refreshing.

On the back of the thread the other day about the partner who doesn't believe in the patriarchy and thinks women have equality, someone stands up and spells out the mindset of the patriarchy and the truth of the situation if judged through a fairly short term business lens.

This is what equality means to a lot of men in senior roles.

I think it is helpful to get it out there and remind everyone what women face.

He doesn't realise that in breaking ranks and saying this he is undoing years of lip service to equality that has hidden the real challenges.

But then he is, as has been mentioned, a colossal bellend.

Report
ThinkAboutItTomorrow · 21/01/2014 09:28

And I say this having experienced almost the exact scenario he describes. I don't work in the city but I work in a role where your ability to bring income into the firm is reliant on client relationships. When you go on mat leave those clients are shared amongst the team and you 'lose' the contacts. You come back from Mat leave to a standing start, with no one to get business from and no work. Taking 8 months mat leave set my career back 2 years. By the time I have had my second child it will be more like 5 years.

It is dispiriting

Report
hopskipandthump · 21/01/2014 09:32

ThinkAboutIt - perhaps there should be a system where clients are 'returned' to you after mat leave? Would that be workable?

Report
ThinkAboutItTomorrow · 21/01/2014 09:38

To some extent there is, but it's a relationship thing and a knowledge thing. Mid project it is hard to transition. And honestly, the clients that get 'returned' tend to be the tricky ones you don't get much work out of. The fun / big / high value clients - once someone else has that relationship it's hard to grapple it off them. We get bonuses and evaluated on how much we bring in.

Report
flatmum · 21/01/2014 09:41

What a cock. I too think it's probably a good thing that he has highlighted the fact that most I the City is still run by dickheads like him who perpetuate female inequality (to protect their own positions). I would have thought he's lost himself a good through female hug achiever votes as well, which can only be a good thing.

Report
flatmum · 21/01/2014 09:42

High

Report
BuffytheReasonableFeminist · 21/01/2014 09:45

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BuffytheReasonableFeminist · 21/01/2014 09:47

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Lottapianos · 21/01/2014 09:49

He is such a Muppet, as is anyone who talks about men and women behaving in different ways for 'biological reasons'. Where does he think the workforce of the future are going to come from if women 'give up on family life'? And absolutely no one is asking the same of men. Agree with other posters that its a good thing that his version of 'equality' has come to light.

Report
Lottapianos · 21/01/2014 09:49

He is such a Muppet, as is anyone who talks about men and women behaving in different ways for 'biological reasons'. Where does he think the workforce of the future are going to come from if women 'give up on family life'? And absolutely no one is asking the same of men. Agree with other posters that its a good thing that his version of 'equality' has come to light.

Report
Lottapianos · 21/01/2014 09:50

He is such a Muppet, as is anyone who talks about men and women behaving in different ways for 'biological reasons'. Where does he think the workforce of the future are going to come from if women 'give up on family life'? And absolutely no one is asking the same of men. Agree with other posters that its a good thing that his version of 'equality' has come to light.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Lottapianos · 21/01/2014 09:50

Oops, sorry! Stupid phone

Report
ThinkAboutItTomorrow · 21/01/2014 10:18

Remind me, why are we still playing by the rules made up by Farage et al?

Because they have the power. The ability to bestow high earning jobs (and many / most other jobs at least on some level) is in the power of men like this. So we play by their rules.

Sorry to sound defeatist but it highlights what a slow process change is going to be. We have to persuade them to change the rules. We can't just opt to play by a different set.

It would be like saying to the suffragettes - 'ignore their stupid rules, go out and vote anyway'. Or am I missing something?

I get that we can shift mindsets with regards to female guilt though, and eventually we can shift mindsets of those doing the hiring but it's going to be slow. Another generation at least.

Report
WilsonFrickett · 21/01/2014 10:50

Weelllll normally I would lose no opportunity to discuss his giant bellendity. But in this case he is speaking the truth - or rather, reflecting the reality of the city. No matter how many diversity teams there are, no matter what their placing on the Sunday Times 'best for families' list, the city is a sexist cesspit and the minute you take mat leave, you are done (in the relationship-type jobs he's describing, you are allowed to come back and do some of the female ghetto jobs in admin, comms and HR. Which is nice for the little ladies.)

So he has done feminism a favour by coming out with it.

OF COURSE that's not why he did it Grin But sometimes the fact that this shower of bawbags have a really shit PR machine can be a positive thing, iyswim.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.