My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

MNHQ have commented on this thread

Site stuff

Limiting name changes - what do you think

78 replies

Twiglett · 04/05/2005 14:20

Saw this from Justine on another thread and just didn't want it to get lost

I'd really hate it if you limited name changes, I have so much fun (on occasion) playing around with names (innocently)

like with WigWamBam, I was WamBamSham
with Soupy I've been TwiglettDragon and SOUPerciliousDragon

I vote a big resounding NO (although maybe there could be a facility to get rid of them once you've used them?)

OP posts:
Report
WigWamBam · 04/05/2005 14:22

I've enjoyed playing around with silly names, too, always innocently and never maliciously. I think I'd be sad to see name changes limited, too.

Report
WamBamSham · 04/05/2005 14:23

See how cool does that look

WigWamBam- WamBamSham

Report
Caligula · 04/05/2005 14:23

I've never messed about with sham names, but would like to! So I vote no.

As everything is anonymous anyway, I can't see how it would actually solve any problems. And it would put an end to the glorious nortiness of threads like Jane and the neighbour's cleaner and the cat and the football.

Report
LemonDrizzle · 04/05/2005 14:24

Another BIG NO from this direction. For lots of reasons. Maybe I'll come back with my real name to make a list.

Report
SaintGeorge · 04/05/2005 14:25

Vot no to having a limit, but I quite like the idea of MN HQ having the ability to 'out' the really nasty posters. Might make people think before they post.

Report
compo · 04/05/2005 14:26

Another NO thanks here

Report
Fio2 · 04/05/2005 14:27

No let us cxhange names

I mean what if you say you are limited to 5 and you have more than 5 life changing anon moments in a month, you will run out then

Report
Newbarnsleygirl · 04/05/2005 14:28

Another no here.

Report
Understand · 04/05/2005 14:29

NO

Report
flashingnose · 04/05/2005 14:30

Well I still vote for a maximum but would be happy with MN/moderators "outing" the nasty ones.

Report
roisin · 04/05/2005 14:32

Just to buck the trend, I think yes
I think a maximum of 3 would be a good thing. (OK, I've actually had 5, but even so!)

Report
Codswallap · 04/05/2005 14:35

Oh no - definitely not!! It would finally kill the last remaining bit of fun on the site --- far too 'nanny state' IMHO....

Report
QueenEagle · 04/05/2005 14:35

No, even though I've never changed my name. Oh how I would miss the hilarity of threads like the cat and the neighbour's football

Report
Caligula · 04/05/2005 14:37

Also I think people should be able to change names if they want to. I changed mine because I got paranoid about being recognised in RL. And I may get paranoid again. [twitch]

Report
flashingnose · 04/05/2005 14:37

The truly horrible post that made spacedonkey fall on her sword deserved outing. Don't think that's nanny state TBH.

Report
moondog · 04/05/2005 14:37

Where is this mythical cat and football thread??!

Report
RTKangaMummy · 04/05/2005 14:37

It is a NO to a limit from me

Cos otherwise all my alter egos that get let loose on ONLY JOKING TOPIC

for funfunfun

would be very


BTW

THEY ARE ONLY ON ONLY JOKING AND ARE NOT ALLOWED TO LEAVE THAT TOPIC

Report
JustineeMumsnet · 04/05/2005 14:37

OK, OK, we won't do it then..........

Report
Pruni · 04/05/2005 14:38

Message withdrawn

Report
lima · 04/05/2005 14:38

me too Caligula - not being able to change my name would inhibit me posting personal and therefore identifiable stuff.

BIG NO VOTE

Report
WigWamBam · 04/05/2005 14:39

Thank you Justine! Mwah, mwah!

I do think you should be able to out people who misuse the name changing facility, though.

Report
Newbarnsleygirl · 04/05/2005 14:40

Oh thank goodness.

The end of RTKM's alter egos

How would we cope?

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Pruni · 04/05/2005 14:40

Message withdrawn

Report
Gwenick · 04/05/2005 14:41

I think there should definitley be a 'limit' to how many names you can use........

Report
almost40 · 04/05/2005 14:44

From all of my different personas, a resounding NO NO NO NO NO NO NO . ..

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.