I have long grappled with the issue of whether or not to become a vegatarian.
What stops me, I think, is that me not eating meat probably won't actually achieve anything positive in terms of the lives of the countless animals that will still be slaughtered? Maybe for every 100 people who are vegetarians the number of animals killed dectreases slightly, but even if a few still suffer, what is the point if you can't ultimately eradicate the suffering of those who remain?
Wouldn't it be better to remain 'on the inside' so to speak, (ie a meat-eater) and try to change the industry by purchasing choices - buying good quality, cruelty free, non-factory produce?
Also, if I were to become a vegetarian, what would I do regarding leather goods? Surely you can't stop eating meat and still wear leather, a by-product (at best) of the food process?
Yet I still feel sickened by the thought of what happens in slaughterouses (I have read some distressing things os late) and the de-sensitised brutish people who may work there.
I don't mean to be controversial, and I suppose I am just turning things over in my head (which doesn't feel particularly sharp today), but it would be useful to hear some other points of view on this.
Discover eco friendly brands and sustainable fashion on our Ethical Living forum.
Ethical living
Vegetarianism vs. meat-eating with a 'conscience'
MrsSeanBean · 29/08/2009 19:29
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.