The thing is, this policy WON'T affect pensioners whose DC's have already left home. So won't free up those houses.
And at the same time as implementing this rule, they have ALSO changed the rules on who qualifies for what size property on the Council/HA list.
Last year, with a (then) 13yo DD, a 9yo DS, a 7yo DS, and a baby DS, I qualified and was given a 4 bed HA property.
Now I no longer qualify for a 4 bed. There is a 3 year wait for a 3-bed Council/HA house here. Nobody else wants to swap because they will also be out of pocket.
So where EXACTLY in my non existent surplus (defecit more bloody like) of benefits am I meant to find an ADDITIONAL £100 a month to top up my housing benefit with, when I am ALREADY paying a £100 a month top up?
That is a week and a half every month of my benefits.
I give up on trying to explain to people why the only possible reason for this policy is to dismantle the Welfare state without giving a toss about the consequences.
And no, I can't go out to work. No fucker wants to employ me. Probably because I have 3 diagnosed disabilities now, and 3/4 of my DC's also have dxd disabilities.
And no, I don't get ESA right now, ATOS think they can cure my disability by telling me I no longer qualify for ESA. I'm not sure if they think they're fucking Jesus or what.
And of course, as I no longer get ESA (I was getting IB), and my DLA renewal was due quite quickly afterwards, I lost my DLA too.
And font think the disabled are protected from the effects of this shitty rule - even those requiring a live in, or overnight carer, are not exempt. Yet as part of covering H&S regulations, the disabled person HAS to provide a bed in a separate room for the Carer.
Which they won't be able to do if they have to downsize. Which conveniently cuts the costs on overnight care too. Leaving these disabled people to fend for themselves.
And people can't envisage the myriad of reasons why this policy is a load of wank designed to cut the cost of Welfare without putting alternatives in place?!