Are sexual insult words ever justified? (follow on from an AIBU thread - wrong place)

[kentishgirl]

So....

slag and slut. Strong words. Anti-women/anti-feminist?

But are there ever behaviours that warrant their use?

I'm not thinking of women's sexual behaviour that is not deliberately harmful such as having sex with however many partners, in a certain way, dressing in a certain way, etc etc that at times attracts those words in a manner that of course I do not in any way support. Slut shaming and so on is appalling.

But is there a need for a word (for both sexes) that covers sexual behaviour that is deliberately harmful to others? Because if there is, I can't think of any alternatives.

We have words for positive behaviour and people. Kind, thoughtful, courageous, hero and heroine.

We have words for negative behaviour and people. Cruel, liar, murderer, mugger.

Assuming that we need these labels (and I think we do need a vocabulary that covers these things), do we need a label for sexually harmful behaviour/people?

Those who deliberately infect others with STDs?
Those who have affairs?

Which gets to why I was thinking about this. My ex had an affair. At the time (to him) I referred to her as 'your slag' and 'your slut' and her name in my head is still simply 'Slag': it has become her identity for me. Yes I know he is the one who cheated on me. There are words to cover his actions at the time: cheat; liar; manipulative; deceitful; disloyal; etc etc etc. She did not cheat, she did not lie to me, she did not manipulate me, she did not deceive me, she was not disloyal to me. These same words cannot apply to her or her behaviour. Yet she displayed 'negative' behaviour in that she knew what the situation was, and I don't think many of us support the idea that it's ok to sleep with a married man. So what words are there for this behaviour/person, if I can't use slut/slag? When I use them here, I'm not being anti-women, I'm describing the behaviour of one woman. But I am uncomfortable with those words because of the way they are usually used to attack women who aren't doing anything wrong.

Are there any alternatives? Am I wrong in thinking we need a vocabulary to express that sexual behaviour can be wrong? Should we never judge another woman for her sexual behaviour?

[Keepithidden]

Okay, I won't bother then Capt.

As a side note, the more I read on MN and FWR in particular, the less I think there is a good advert for cool girls. Mind you, I hate the adjective "cool" anyway, except if it's purely in temperature terms.

[CaptChaos]

I wouldn't bother Keep, it's a not very well argued advert for cool girls, the ones who hate feminists because we're totes making the world a less fun place, cos we're the thought police, innit.

[Keepithidden]

Thanks Ramsay and Capt. May have to put wading through the whole 22 pages on hold until I have an hour or so to spare though.

[TheDoctrineOfSnatch]

Have only read the first few pages but ViviPru seems to have nailed it
----
"It's a pun on the word 'slag'. Implying that she is somehow shameful for giving away sandwiches to more than one group of people.

^^I grasp that, but it still doesn't make it a joke, there's no comedic structure to the main linguistics or actions... It's like one if those kiddy non-jokes "You've got brown hair - you're a poo head ha ha"

[CaptChaos]

This one?

[RamsaySnowsSausage]

Keepit It was about a woman who had heard her (male) colleague talking about another (female) colleague. The female colleague collected up sandwiches after meetings and distributed them around departments. Because she gave them to a few different departments he called her 'a sandwich slag who gets about a bit' (paraphrasing).

Lot's of people agreed that no, that was not ok, then a load more came on and said 'lighten up ya bunch o' bitches...can't you take a joke you hairy slags' (again, paraphrasing)!

The lengths some people were going to to justify his sexist 'banter' was cringe-worthy!

[Keepithidden]

Ramsay - The "sandwich slag" thread? That particular gem must've passed me by! What was the synopsis?

[AnyFucker]

...and quit the idiotic catcalling

[AnyFucker]

Summat like that

[TheDoctrineOfSnatch]

Or, to paraphrase "piss off, you sexist twat"

[AnyFucker]

I don't want no scrub, scrub is a guy that can't get no love from me

Hanging out the passenger side of his best friend's ride, tryin' to holler at me...

[TheDoctrineOfSnatch]

I find that strangely heartening.

[AnyFucker]

yup

[TheDoctrineOfSnatch]

As in "I don't want no scrubs"?

[AnyFucker]

There are some newer non-gender insults coming up through the teen route

"scruff" is changing meaning slightly to describe slovenly, dodgy, low rent, morally repugnant behaviour

also "scrub" which I thought was short for "scrubber" (usually ascribed to women) is often used about men who cocklodge and dodge responsibilities

[RamsaySnowsSausage]

Keepit that reminds me of the 'sandwich slag' thread.

[mrsbrownsgirls]

you don't need special vocabulary. you just need to move on. Good luck

[TheDoctrineOfSnatch]

There are plenty of gendered insults but they rarely refer to the sexual behaviour of men.

[Keepithidden]

This thread has made me think a lot. I'm not sure whether language and it's use is a reflection on the society in which it is used or vice-versa though.

Words tend to be pretty transitionary things, at the moment the words the OP uses do tend to be insults directed at women, because they are women. However they are being used elsewhere in different contexts for different purposes I think. The stereotypical Essex-Boy/East End Gangster is often heard referring to anyone (gender unspecific) as a "slaaag" (emphasis on the "a" due to the accent). "Tart" is another one that seems to have a less gendered role: I've known an audience in a marketing situation referred to as "brand tarts" due to their lack of brand loyalty. Paralells can be drawn here I suppose with racist language too.

I suppose, as ever, context is everything. In 95% (or at least the poverwhelming majority) of situations these words are likley to be mysoginistic on some level though.

Having said that, if we start using them in a non-gendered way maybe language can be forced into making changes on society!

[TeiTetua]

Someone said "a lying cheating, bastard" above, and I'm pretty sure nobody would call a woman that. So that would be a gendered insult directed at a man.

[KoalaFace]

I agree that using words to describe behaviour is preferable to a putdown that will ultimately just be used against women in general.

OP you described your ex's behaviour wonderfully. The OW showed herself to have a completely selfish, disregard for you and your relationship. She was cruel.

[AskBasil]

And of course cocklodgers were not a widespread phenomenon like they are now - the social and economic position of women meant that by definition, that opportunity to be a cock-lodger was pretty restricted

[AskBasil]

You used to get more words to describe a man with bad sexual morals/ behaviour, but they've fallen out of use. Someone has mentioned the word cad, which was a serious insult at one point and wolf was also used to describe a sexual predator. I think as caddishness and wolfishness has actually become more acceptable, they're no longer appropriate insults - they belong to a time when the behaviours they describe were actually frowned upon (if it were being displayed towards women of a certain social class of course - it didn't matter if you were only subjecting lower class women to that behaviour, in that case the insults weren't relevant).

[AskBasil]

Also cocklodger is quite a new word isn't it?

I'd never heard it before I came on Mumsnet and lots of people in RL still don't recognise it.

I wish I had known it when I first met my xdp...

[Creeping]

I've thought of a word that is used for a man that refers to his sexual behaviour negatively, but it's not usually used in relation to cheating: cock lodger. But it's the only one I can think of while there are lists of words to describe women.