My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Find your new favourite book or recommend one on our Book forum.

What we're reading

The Nonesuch - Georgette Heyer 28

40 replies

HoratiaDrelincourt · 31/05/2014 21:26

My turn again? Wink

This isn't the first time we've encountered by Regency standards The Perfect Man, nor will it be the last. How does Sir Waldo compare with Sylvester, with Beaumaris, with Alverstoke?

Unlike the earlier incarnations, he is not arrogant nor judgey. His fault is perhaps levity. His only fault apparent to Ancilla is not even real. Is he too perfect? I don't lust after admire him as I do the flawed-hero-redeemed-by-love. I certainly don't find him interesting.

Ancilla isn't much better - noble enough, clever, witty, modest, principled ... but not interesting. This is another novel distinguished not by the love story but rather by the minor characters and their escapades. As Heyer grew up grew old? did she find romance calmer, quieter, gentler, leaving the adventures for the young? We began to see her grow out of the exciting "falling in love" in Civil Contract, after all.

The minor characters, then: a substantial cast of mainly young (15-25), well-off people without much to do. They inherit and spend money, passing their time in riding, walking, dancing, and bickering good-heartedly.

The novel opens in great age, and death, as the old cousin is succeeded by Waldo. Lady Lindeth would have thought herself a very unnatural parent had she not made a push to secure [Joseph's fortune] for her son [... but] after all her pains he had left his entire estate to Waldo, who was neither the most senior of his relations nor the one who bore his name! [...] To learn that Cousin Joseph's estate was to be added to an already indecently large fortune did make her feel for a few minutes that so far from liking him she detested him.

Since one cannot possibly earn money one must inherit whatever one can. In the novel there are consequently lots of mothers but few fathers. Inevitably this becomes a role Waldo takes on for the poor orphans and his own cousins. But he does not do so equally, nor particularly, not having had a good example of his own. Is this his one fault, which eluded me earlier?

"You know, George, when my father died, I was too young for my inheritance. I ruined Laurie. By the time I'd acquired enough sense to know what it signified to him, the mischief had been done."

Further on: By his easy, unthinking generosity he had sapped whatever independence Laurie might have had, imposing no check upon his volatility, but rather encouraging him in the conviction that he would never be run quite off his legs because his wealthy cousin would infallibly rescue him from utter disaster.

When Laurie tries to rescue Lindeth (not realising that he is no longer captive) it is not for his own sake, but only for Waldo's approval, and specifically his purse. Laurie had not been mistaken in thinking that Julian was [Waldo's] favourite cousin.

We talked last time of a move towards Victorianism, and Waldo's work for "his brats" is very Victorian in its paternalism. In a generation it will be expected of all gentlemen (and not just clergy) - he is a pioneer. Laurence for one is unsympathetic: "What ought to be mine is to be squandered on the scaff and raff of the back-slums! You don't want it yourself, but you'd rather by far benefit a set of dirty, worthless brats than your own with and kin. [...] By God, you make me sick!"

And it is the fact that his benevolence is unusual that causes the misunderstanding with Ancilla. By far more plausible that a sporting man should have a string of by-blows and offer a governess a carte blanche than that he should sponsor a string of orphanages!

Meanwhile, an orphan with every possible advantage - except in character:
"And if you think he has only to see you to fall in love with you, you much mistake the matter! I dare swear he is acquainted with a score of girls prettier by far than you!"
"Oh no!" she said, adding simply: "He couldn't be!"
Miss Chartley was silenced. Honesty compelled her to acknowledge that Tiffany Wield was the most beautiful creature she had ever seen or acknowledged. Everything about her was perfection.

Our previous heroines have been beautiful, if conventionally so. Here, though, outer beauty is vanquished by inner maturity and generosity of character: again the older, wiser Heyer tiring of the fairytale themes of her youth.

But the young of the story are still on thrall to Beauty. Tiffany's outrageous first meeting with Lindeth really should have put him on his guard. Again and again she acts disgracefully but he defends her until he has the obvious comparison with Patience right under his nose. His manners are perfect throughout, nonetheless: if she had been an invisible spectator she would not have guessed from his demeanour that he was at all disappointed. He was far too polite to betray himself; and of too cheerful and friendly a disposition to show the least want of cordiality.

Waldo, on the other hand, has Tiffany's measure almost immediately, understanding her just as Mrs Underhill and Miss Trent, though managing her differently as the novel progresses: as conduct befitting one who was to all intents and purposes a daughter of the house this belated arrival on the scene might leave much to be desired; but as an entrance it was superb. He had never beheld a livelier vision, and he was neither impressionable nor three-and-twenty. Oh my God! thought Sir Waldo. Now we are in the basket!

It is to Waldo that Tiffany turns after her carriage is heinously stolen from her to transport the wretched brat - Like a child suffering from over-excitement, she was as miserable as she was cross. Tiffany never consciously deviated from the truth, but since she saw everything only as it affected herself, the truth was apt to become somewhat distorted.

Julian's enlightenment comes slowly but surely: first he sees Tiffany's spiteful selfishness which she dresses up as reaction against over-propriety; then her callous disregard for her friend's health. By the final incident with the little boy the scales have already fallen from his eyes.
Miss Trent had seen the look of shocked dismay in his face when it had been so forcibly borne in on him that his goddess had feet of clay; and her heart was wrung with pity.

But Julian's "love" for Tiffany is like Romeo's for Rosaline - preparing him for the wife to suit him, regardless of how ill-matched they might seem at first glance.

Sir Waldo believed that [Lady Lindeth] would soon take the gentle Patience to her bosom. A pungent description of the beautiful Miss Wield would go a long way towards settling her mind. [...] Just as Patience differed from Tiffany, so did Julian's courtship of her differ from his eager pursuit of Tiffany. He had begun with liking; his admiration had been kindled by the Leeds episode; and he was now quietly and deeply in love. In other words, he has followed the adult model Heyer is now preferring!

"Do you know, Waldo, I never thought of marriage?" he said naively. "I hadn't considered it before, but now you've mentioned it I don't think that I ever thought of it until I met Miss Chartley. In fact, I never thought about the future at all. But since I've come to know Patience, naturally, I've done so, because I wish to spend the rest of my life with her. And what's more, I'm going to!"

(on to second post as original was too long for an OP Blush - who knew there was even a limit!!)

OP posts:
Report
Tanaqui · 02/08/2014 12:47

My rl name is one of those dismissed above- and I was named for the character!

Report
MrsHathaway · 01/08/2014 20:52

n]

Goes off to read...

Report
MrsHathaway · 01/08/2014 20:52

n]

Goes off to re

Report
MrsHathaway · 01/08/2014 20:51

Life does have that habit [gri

Report
LadyIsabellaWrotham · 01/08/2014 09:10
Report
LadyIsabellaWrotham · 01/08/2014 08:30

You were waiting for me because Life intervened I'm afraid. I'm just about to start it off.

Report
HowGoodIsThatInAnAgressiveJers · 28/07/2014 20:15




I am not in my GH guise but how lovely to see you all again....

I am off to dig out False Colours.

Agree with all comments above - this is def second tier.
Report
HoratiaDrelincourt · 28/07/2014 20:09

STILL WAITING.

Are we holding off because it is so daft?

OP posts:
Report
HoratiaDrelincourt · 19/07/2014 18:19

I've finished False Colours but by golly I had to force myself, so I don't think I've read it through before.

I don't want to start the thread. Am instead waiting not very patiently.

OP posts:
Report
MooncupGoddess · 26/06/2014 22:13

I've finished False Colours and am raring to go Grin



Report
RobinEllacott · 22/06/2014 20:44

I've finished it (NCed but been on quite a few of these threads under different monikers). Do start it: I like it much better than the Nonesuch, even if it has a feeble ending.

Report
LadyIsabellaWrotham · 22/06/2014 10:53

How are people getting on with False Colours? I thought I might start it off in a few days time.

Report
HoratiaDrelincourt · 15/06/2014 14:41

Very interesting! I think I agree.

OP posts:
Report
MooncupGoddess · 15/06/2014 09:17

Ah, that is useful to know! I have read the Jane Aiken Hodge biog (which I agree is excellent) but had forgotten that bit.

Report
Idontknowhowtohelpher · 15/06/2014 09:09

In Jane Aiken Hodge's biography of Georgette Heyer she quotes from a letter GH wrote where GH says that The Nonsuch had been "written under difficulties, and I think it stinks." She was having problems with her publishers at the time. It's a good biography and really readable!

Report
MooncupGoddess · 14/06/2014 12:57

Oh, GH Book Club is back! Thank God I haven't missed Frederica.

As a child I couldn't bear Ancilla's misunderstanding re the orphan home - so embarrassing, and also so improbable... I can't imagine any Regency bucks, however prolific, collecting up their byblows (what about the mothers?) and bringing them up together in a Home.

Plus, much of the novel reads like a knock-off of The Quiet Gentleman (not one of the greats itself) and Waldo is the ugliest name I have ever heard. One wonders if GH had something going on in her personal life that meant she just didn't engage with the writing as she usually did, bar the few strong set-pieces people have mentioned.

Report
LadyIsabellaWrotham · 14/06/2014 12:45

Laurence is so awful, but I love his big showdown with Tiffany at the end. He's like a less attractive combination of the two cousins in Unknown Ajax - the ludicrous dandy and the sarcastic jealous one (Vincent and I forget the other). Waldo isn't nearly as funny, charming and heroic as Hugo though. It's a bit disappointing that Laurence ends up with the money for his doomed horse trading scheme - I'd have preferred his fantastic treatment of Tiffany to be better rewarded.

Report
ImogenQuy · 12/06/2014 06:55

I dislike Vidal. Avon, I like - too stylish to dislike, and in any case his worst days are behind him by the beginning of TOS- but Vidal is a thug in glamorous costume. I agree Waldo is colourless!

Report
crumpet · 11/06/2014 21:58

There are some very good set pieces though - Tiffany's tantrum at the inn, Patience saving the little boy, Laurence refusing to help Tiffany run away, and I do rather like Ancilla. I think that she does have depth - plus a good sense of humour (would need one to live with Tiffany mind you).

Waldo is a bit too colourless, although I can't say that I dislike any of GH's heros (Rotherham and Lord Worth would require far too much effort to deal with so are definitely at the lower end).

Report
Auntimatter · 08/06/2014 20:12

Oh, I rather like the Nonesuch. It makes me laugh.

The interest is certainly in the teenagers rather than the grown-up romance that is the basic plot, but that spreads the focus around.

I like the rector and his family. So normal (and there aren't that many normal loving 2-parent families in Heyer's books). It's quite refreshing.

The last one I read was Sylvester. I much prefer the Nonesuch: so much less preposterous andHeyer's charm comes to the fore.

Report
ImogenQuy · 08/06/2014 20:03

Ooh, glad we're back on with the Heyer book club. Having said that this is one of my bottom five or so - the names are terrible, as other posters have said, the good characters are too perfect, Tiffany is a brat, and I don't care what happens to any of them much. It's not nearly as funny as some of the others either. I think the only really good one we've got left to do is Frederica.

Report
HoratiaDrelincourt · 08/06/2014 08:04

Welcome!

We started off fortnightly, but, erm, you'll have longer than that. It needs someone to jump in feet first with an OP.

OP posts:
Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Tinuviel · 07/06/2014 23:34

Please may I join in? I adore GH novels, both historical and detective and have just found this thread. I will have to dig out False Colours - how long do I have to read it?

Report
MissClemencyTrevanion · 06/06/2014 22:17

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

HoratiaDrelincourt · 03/06/2014 23:43

Beaumaris is far sexier than Waldo. He's brooding.

Arabella has the natural generosity; Beaumaris has the reserve and oversight. I think Arabella and Waldo together would try to save everyone and bankrupt themselves in the process. Ancilla is the sensible, measured one in the Hawkridge family.

OP posts:
Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.